Slashdot Mirror


Protecting State Secrets Through Copyright

An anonymous reader writes "The United States has pursued Bradley Manning with full force for his role in supplying classified documents to WikiLeaks, in part because of the substantial difficulty in going after the organization directly. Criminal statutes generally deployed against those who leak classified government documents — such as the Espionage Act of 1917 — are ill-equipped to prosecute third-party international distribution organizations like WikiLeaks. One potential tool that could be used to prosecute WikiLeaks is copyright law. The use of copyright law in this context has rarely been mentioned, and when it has, the approach has been largely derided by experts, who decry it as contrary to the purposes of copyright. But a paper just published in the Stanford Journal of International Law describes one novel way the U.S. could use copyright to go after WikiLeaks and similar leaking organizations directly--by bringing suit in foreign jurisdictions."

6 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. That's just great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now they should publish an article on how to use international law to reign in the abuse of political, economic and military power by the United States on the international arena.

  2. Public documents are now copyrighted? by Whammy666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seem to recall that works done by a government entity belong to the public and are not subject to copyright. Even so, this seems like a rather petty move. Of course, they tortured and held Bradly Manning is solitary confinement for a year without any charges so I guess expecting any sort of civility in the matter is unrealistic.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
  3. You know when a law is too strong when... by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, if the punishments for copyright law are considered sufficient deterrence for things like treason or espionage that they're WAY too strong. Why on Earth would we want a set of laws that puts distributing a copy of a movie on the same level as disseminating nuclear weapon plans?

  4. Facts can't be copyrighted. by fredmosby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is disturbing that the US government is going to such lengths to keep its own citizens in the dark. Something has gone very wrong in Washington.

    1. Re:Facts can't be copyrighted. by fredmosby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of what was leaked never should have been a secret. The governments been keeping its activities secret so it doesn't have to be accountable to its citizens.

      Bradley Manning may be a traitor to the government, but not to the American people.

    2. Re:Facts can't be copyrighted. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something is very wrong, indeed. Bradley Manning should have been charged with treason and hanged.

      I'm sure what you meant to write is: "Bradley Manning should have been charged with and tried for treason, and if convicted, sentenced to death."

      The fact is that all these pussy liberals are going to soft on him. Traitors must be punished and executed.

      It's always interesting to see how quickly conservatives are ready to abandon their alleged commitment to the rule of law and the purity of the US Constitution.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.