Slashdot Mirror


At Long Last, a Private Cargo Spaceship Takes Off (Video)

Tuesday morning at 0344, right on schedule (and it had to be right on schedule), Elon Musk's baby finally left the launch pad on its way to the International Space Station (ISS). Two babies, actually: the Falcon 9 launch vehicle is what we watched as it took off from Cape Canaveral -- the first private spaceship headed for the ISS -- with the Dragon spacecraft perched on its nose. The Dragon carried over 1000 pounds of supplies and experiments for the ISS. The launch went off without a hitch. But don't stop holding your breath quite yet; Dragon isn't scheduled to dock at the ISS until Friday. Slashdot now accepts reader-submitted video, either edited or raw. Email robinATroblimoPERIODcom for details.

18 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Popping sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After watching both this and Copenhagen Suborbital's launch, I noticed that the rockets seem to "pop" at a few Hz. I don't recall hearing this on NASA launches, does anyone know why this is?

    1. Re:Popping sound by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you mean the "popping noise" the TM65 engine that Copenhagen Suborbitals testet made at startup, then it was a bit of engine oscilations. It's most likely caused by the engine being run at a low fuel pressure. The fuel will ignite in the ignition chamber, causing the pressure to rise, giving a higher exhaust flow, causing the pressure to drop, giving less exhaust flow, resulting in more fuel in the ignition chamber, that ignites, ...

      At higher fuel pressures the oscilations are dampened. (But they do sound awsome!)

      I don't know if that's the case with SpaceX's Falcon, but I'm pretty sure that if they have engine oscilations it's nothing they can't handle.

    2. Re:Popping sound by longacre · · Score: 4, Funny

      NASA probably used special $3 billion taxpayer-funded microphones for their launches, whereas cost-conscious SpaceX bought theirs at Best Buy.

    3. Re:Popping sound by KPU · · Score: 5, Funny

      So SpaceX paid more?

    4. Re:Popping sound by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is aerospace engineering, not kid stuff. You have to buy the optional Monster Cables and add the extended warranty.

  2. It will all be fine by bobstreo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Scotty is on board.

    1. Re:It will all be fine by bledri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Insightful? Interesting? It's Funny FFS

      It may be funny, but it's also true.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  3. An accounting marvel by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Informative

    A commenter on NPR today made an interesting point. There is a lot of talk about "first private..." but NASA has relied heavily on private industry since the beginning. Lockheed Martin, Morton Thaikol, Boeing, Northrup Grumman, Raytheon, Rockwell Colllins, Teledyne, Honeywell, Kodak, Perkin-Elmer.........

    And Falcon launched from a government built/owned/maintained launch-site.

    What *is* different is the accounting. Instead of a bevy of cost-plus contracts there is now a single-point fixed-cost provider which, surprise surprise, seems to be able to deliver at a much lower cost/kg.

    And no, this does not detract from their accomplishment. Getting to space is still difficult and risky. Congratulations to everyone involved regardless of who writes their paychecks.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:An accounting marvel by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Delta-IV is about 3x as expensive to launch as the Falcon 9. Delta-IV is pretty much the most expensive way to put things in orbit now that the shuttle is gone.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:An accounting marvel by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the past, the vehicles have been turned over to NASA (or other relevant space agency) whereas here, SpaceX has maintained ownership of the launch vehicle and capsule. It's one of the reasons that NASA has been so paranoid over the launch is because it has less direct control of it.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:An accounting marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, you could call Lockheed Martin, Morton Thaikol, Boeing,, et al "private companies", but I think the difference is that none of them would suck a deep breath without a government contract signed, sealed and delivered.

      SpaceX designed, built and tested their Falcon rocket and Dragon spacecraft on their own dime.

      Yes, I know NASA provided some funding, but that was extra funding. You can bet Elon Musk would have funded the whole thing himself if he had to.

  4. Not bad, Slashdot by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • Using video for action, text for info. Check.
    • Very little "talking heads". Check
    • Geek interest. Check
    • Short, and to the point. Check

    Not bad. That's the way to do video.

  5. Details by optimism · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the minority of /. readers who care about the details, I highly recommend downloading the COTS 2 Press Kit from SpaceX.
    It provides tons of details and graphics describing the mission objectives, schedule, cargo manifest, vehicle specs, and much more...

    http://www.spacex.com/downloads/COTS-2-Press-Kit-5-14-12.pdf

    (I am not affiliated with SpaceX, but I like what they are doing)

  6. Re:Docking on Friday? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a layman's perspective, I'm confused as to why it takes so long to get to LEO? How fast does this compare with the space shuttle? Why does it take so long to dock?

    It's not McDonald's. You don't just drive up to it. Like a beautiful woman, you have to chase it... No, I didn't really say that.

    Basically, they're taking their time checking systems out. They are doing a close approach pass to ensure that the communications and control links work before taking it in close. A Soyuz capsule has already crash-parked into the ISS with much consternation and concern. They're just being really, really careful.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. Re:Docking on Friday? by fgodfrey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It only takes about 10 minutes to get to orbit. I believe the Shuttle and the Progress & Soyuz spacecraft all took about 2 days to dock with ISS. I believe most of that time is spent matching the orbits perfectly and "catching up" with it in orbit (you don't want to approach too fast and slowing down requires fuel, and fuel is weight so you want to use as little as feasible).

    Dragon is taking awhile longer because this is only the second time that the Dragon has flown and the first time docking. So, they're going to run a whole bunch of tests to ensure that they can control the spacecraft from the ground and then a bunch more to make sure the astronauts on the ISS can control it. Then, finally, they'll let it get close enough to dock. I suspect (though I have no actual information on this) that once they get past the "test flight" phase, it will take a similar amount to time to Soyuz/Progress/Shuttle to get there.

    --
    Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
  8. Re:And now we can cut off space funding. by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know you think you'e being clever, but the fact is that NASA worked very hard to prevent any private development of space flight capabilities for several decades.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Re:And now we can cut off space funding. by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it had been left to the private sector, we'd wouldn't have got to the moon, mars, the heliosheath. And despite the fact that earth orbit is profitable, probably no private sector project would have made the investment or taken the risk to go to space at all.

    Space X can only do what it's doing now because it's standing on the shoulders of previous public sector projects. And heck this very project is being paid for by the public sector.

  10. It isn't docking. by ZankerH · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dragon isn't scheduled to dock at the ISS until Friday.

    The Dragon isn't capable of docking, it has to be grappled by the station's robotic arm and berthed to a common berthing port. It is scheduled to receive an upgrade that enables it to use docking ports in the future, but on this flight, it's berthing, not docking.