Slashdot Mirror


Machine-Guided Learning Matches Teachers In Study

New submitter dougled writes "A study at six universities found that students taught statistics mainly through software learned as much as peers taught primarily by humans. And the robots got the job done more quickly. '... our results indicate that hybrid-format students took about one-quarter less time to achieve essentially the same learning outcomes as traditional-format students.' They add, 'There is every reason to expect these systems to improve over time, perhaps dramatically, and thus it is not foolish to believe that learning outcomes will also improve.'"

2 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Was the teacher tutoring a single student? by wanzeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most valuable part of machine assisted learning is the ability to move at your own pace. There are some OCW lectures I had to watch 3 or 4 times before I got it. Now matter how good a teacher is, no student is going to ask them to repeatsomething four times. The student will just nod and feign understanding, and the teacher will move on.

  2. Re:Was the teacher tutoring a single student? by RivenAleem · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's great to see the robots are joining in on the discussion.