Slashdot Mirror


SAP VP Arrested In False Barcode Scheme

redletterdave writes "With barcode scanning being so commonplace, nothing seemed out of the ordinary when Thomas Langenbach, the vice president of SAP, was found scanning boxes upon boxes of Lego toys before purchasing them. Little did anyone know, the 47-year-old Silicon Valley executive was actually engaged in a giant scam. Langenbach would visit several Target stores and cover the store's barcodes with his own, so when he would bring the boxes up to the register, Langenbach would pay a heavily-discounted price. For example, this tag swapping allowed him to buy a Millennium Falcon box of Legos worth $279 for just $49. Once he bought the discounted Lego boxes, the SAP executive would take to eBay (under the name 'tomsbrickyard') and sell the items. Langenbach reportedly sold more than 2,000 items on eBay, raking in about $30,000. He was finally caught by Target security on May 8, and he was arraigned on Tuesday on four counts of burglary."

19 of 535 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Common Sense by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you expect the drones at the cash register to know the prices of a billion different store items? You'd be tough to work for...

  2. He was too ambitious by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see old women do this all of the time. Not making their own barcodes, mind you, but swapping the code from the seeded cucumbers to the unseeded ones, or switch the tag from a generic bible and put it onto the fancy one they have their eye on. I wish I wasn't serious.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:He was too ambitious by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What I find funny is the irony of the copyright notice in the front of the bibles and hymnals. Jesus says "Spread the Good News!" The United Methodist Publishing Company says "No part of this may be reproduced without our permission." It's actually on the very first page with any significant text, before any of the scripture itself.

    2. Re:He was too ambitious by wjousts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except it's not a translation of the word of God, but a translation of a bunch of superstitious middle-eastern tribesmen from 2000 odd years ago (or more).

    3. Re:He was too ambitious by gsnedders · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is still under copyright in the UK (copyright held by the Crown has no fixed expiry date), FWIW.

  3. Because he needed the cash? by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely VP of SAP doesn't need to be doing that?

    Some sort of mental illness of thrill-seeking?

    1. Re:Because he needed the cash? by AioKits · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man that's going to chafe....

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Because he needed the cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My doctor growing up was a kleptomaniac. He would take things out of the local grocery without paying for them all the time. No one ever stopped him because he'd always return the goods a couple of hour later. Of course, he wasn't conspiring to do it for profit, he just couldn't help his impulses any more than someone with OCD.

      I suppose this could be something similar, but criminal charges are definitely in order for the nature and amount of the crime.

      You may want to check and see if you still have both of your kidneys. Just sayin.

  4. Re:Common Sense by alphax45 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The drones at most of these stores don't care; I should know I use to be one and I was the "odd man out" that would notice these things and say something. A lot of times as a cashier speed (items per hour) matters more than accuracy. Your bonus can depend on it, so doing any kind of "checks" hurts a lot.

    --
    K Man
  5. Re:Common Sense by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which part of $8/hour confuses you?

    Work just enough not to get fired, paid just enough not to quit.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  6. The sad thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He'll get off easier than some kid downloading a couple songs.

  7. Re:Giant scam? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does this compare to the ongoing financial scams being perpetrated on all of us?

    Totally different ... he got arrested.

  8. Re:Common Sense by PPalmgren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I should know I use to be one and I was the "odd man out" that would notice these things and say something.

    (emphasis added)

    I see this line of thinking a lot, and there's a key factor people tend to forget. There's a reason you've moved on to bigger and better things, and a reason some people continue to do that menial work for a decade. When you hire low wage employees for a while, you begin to realize that any "good find" won't be there for long, because they're meant for something more important.

  9. Re:Kleptomania is a mental disease by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy Sells SAP how much more revenge upon the world could you possibly desire?

  10. Re:Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a manager at a Sams Club in Buffalo NY while at college and there is some good reasoning behind this, even if you/I don't agree with it. Most large retailers goal is to boost profits but cutting expenses; one area to do this is in personnel. If you have fast cashiers, then you need fewer of them. The overwhelming majority of studies in the early to mid nineties showed that the majority of theft was employee related, so to spend a lot of time worrying about customers would be focusing on the wrong area, or as you put it, you would be stepping over millions of dollars to save a few bucks. Another study showed that very few customers who did steal, did it as a one-time deal, it would usually turn in to a pattern and unless your the luckiest man/woman on earth, you're going to get caught eventually.

    As a side note, both Target and Walmart are profitable, so they can't be stepping over too many dollars...just because you don't understand something, doesn't mean it's bad.

  11. Re:Common Sense by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I once visited England and bought everything by the Pound.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  12. Re:Common Sense by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked retail management for about 3 years while I was finishing my masters. I don't mean to toot my own horn (okay, I kind of do), but they were desperate to keep me. Why? I was a terrible manager - I let the employees get away with murder, as long as the work got done. I was insubordinate - if the policy was stupid, I didn't follow it. I told the head of the store that I hated my job and I hated the store - every day for two years.

    So, why were they desperate to keep me? I could think. The regional actually told me that he would be sad to see me go, because critical thinking is rare in retail. They dangled long-term job offers, travel, higher pay and increased benefits to try to get me to stay. Again, why?

    Because I could think. They know that if you have any sort of brain, that retail is just a temporary gig on the road of life, and it makes them sad on the inside.

  13. Re:Common Sense by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the bigger questions are "WTF was the VP of SAP doing pulling a cheap ass eBay scam like what your average meth head would pull? Is he a kelpto? Is the company in trouble? Is his pay THAT shitty?" These questions sound more relevant to me than how long he was able to pull this shit off.

    Because frankly go to any Walmart at rush hour and the checkout girls ain't looking at shit, they are just rushing that shit across the scanner as fast as they can to try to lower the lines. Frankly I wouldn't be surprised that if in most of these chains they probably get bitched at if the line gets too long so looking at what the scanner pulls up is probably the last thing on their minds.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  14. Not always, though by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm going to stand up for the "drones" a bit. To a certain extent pay peanuts get monkeys. But in fact there are a lot of people out there who are not hugely bright or who even have "learning difficulties", but who can do boring jobs for extended periods and are pretty accurate and reliable. I worked for a pharmaceutical manufacturer for a bit while at U, and they looked for people like this and gave them jobs in packing and QA. The difference is that instead of treating them like Walmart they worked hard to keep them motivated, told them that their work was valuable and that all the work of the chemists and the engineers was wasted if the wrong product got out of the door, and made sure that students like me understood this, and that we were easily replaceable while they weren't. They are "good finds" who won't move on. They are not stupid, they just have limitations that are different from those of, say, social ineptness. A lot of that is automated nowadays, but there are still a few, mostly smaller places without the Walmart/Bain/you name it view of replaceable monkeys, and they are often successful because they don't get the level of staff theft and they appeal to older people who value helpful and friendly staff.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."