Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wrongly Gives Britain the Day Off

Barence writes "An error in Outlook's public holidays calendar has incorrectly given Britons the day off work. Today was originally meant to be a Bank Holiday in Britain, but the holiday was postponed for a week to coincide with the Queen's diamond jubilee next week. However, Microsoft Outlook and Windows Live services are still reporting today as Britain's Spring Bank Holiday, potentially tricking Britons into believing they have the day off work."

253 comments

  1. This is what happens with kings/queens by MrJamas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cancel or post-pone some actual holiday because their kings/queens have done something else. It's hardly Microsoft's fault. And this would not be mentioned in news if it wasn't USA or UK Kingdom.

    1. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has people working in the UK and the USA...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 2

      If you look at his user profile he's only got two posts, the first one being the GP of this thread.

    3. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK Kingdom? You mean the U Kingdom, otherwise it would be the United Kingdom Kingdom

      And creating a fictional holiday for a president is better how?

      The holiday has not been moved FOR the queen but for the festive activities, to enable people to watch the diamond jubilee of HRH Elisabeth II.
      It's a huge thing on that quirky little island in the middle of the north sea.

      FSM save the queen!

    4. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 0

      So what? In coding the system to determine holiday dates, how would they at the time of encoding know that the queen would feel like throwing a party next week?

      Being from a certain family means you can just change holidays at will? Fuck that.

      Between excessive surveillance and governmental nonsense like this, I am so glad I don't live in the UK.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    5. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft has people working in the UK and the USA...

      Not today.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    6. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by arisvega · · Score: 1

      And this would not be mentioned in news if it wasn't USA or UK

      Well, this prediction is probably correct, but what I see here as news is what can happen when you outsource your clocks/calendars. Microsoft is not that influential in that matter, but an iPhone bug like this one that affects when your morning alarm goes off, will probably end up with you arriving at work one hour late.

      Not that it matters too much, because your boss, along with a fair share of the rest of your country, will be affected as well.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    7. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by loufoque · · Score: 1

      UK Kingdom

      Are those the friends of the USA of America?

    8. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm about as far as you can get from being a royalist in the UK - I couldn't give a toss whether the old geezers are throwing a party.

      All I know is that by moving this holiday by 1 week, then giving us an extra day off (apparently for the jubilee day itself?) on this Friday, I have been presented with a 5 day weekend :D and it's set to be some of the best weather of the year according the weekly forecast.

      Not to say we still shouldn't get shot of the giant money-sinks - but I don't think anyone in the UK will using this holiday as a reason to do so.

    9. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by arisvega · · Score: 1

      UK Kingdom

      Are those the friends of the USA of America?

      That they are. They are not very good friends with the People's Republic of PRC though.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    10. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Time zone databases also get routinely updated due to legal changes in respective countries. You can expect calendar systems and other timey stuff in foreign countries to require certain flexibility. The ability to Introduce new public holidays or one-off events such as this one should be a commonplace thing in modern applications dealing with timetables.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how would they at the time of encoding know that the queen would feel like throwing a party next week?

      Probably because a monarch's diamond jubilee is not a party thrown on a whim. It is a celebration of 60 years in power. So.. Microsoft could've known this was coming for basically its entire existence. The plans have hardly been state secrets.

    12. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by mfraz74 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you'll find that the extra day off is next Tuesday and not this Friday. Oh and Ubuntu has been showing the correct bank holiday for at least a year.

    13. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by JSombra · · Score: 3, Informative

      Being from a certain family means you can just change holidays at will? Fuck that.

      Except "they" did not change the day or declare the jubilee a bank holiday, Government did (Labour if i remember correctly). Queen has no authority in creating laws or policy's beyond rubber stamping government policy's. Hell if they even try to talk publicly (or get caught trying to influence privately) about policy's/laws they would like changed/implemented they get lamblasted so in some ways they have less rights that the average citizen

    14. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The queen didn't change the holiday, the prime minister did.

    15. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all hate the Fing French

    16. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft has people working in the UK and the USA...

      Maybe, but the Microsoft people working in the UK are largely employed to market products and lie to governments and standards bodies.

      http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/05/how-microsoft-fought-true-open-standards-v/index.htm
      http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/The_cost_of_ODF_and_OOXML.html

      Note that you have until June 4 2012 to counter some of this Microsoft propaganda.

      Within the Government Digital Service we are already demonstrating how collaboration between departments, along with a clear focus on the user, delivers better public services for less. Open Standards are crucial for sharing information across government boundaries and to deliver a common platform and systems that more easily interconnect. Open standards are vital for progressing this work and I encourage you to share your views in this consultation.

      Francis Maude MP- Minister for the Cabinet Office
      http://consultation.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards/

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    17. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at his user profile he's only got two posts, the first one being the GP of this thread.

      So?

    18. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by jd · · Score: 1

      Hell, anything at all that is data-driven can be updated at the spur of the moment. In this particular case, though, Microsoft has been forewarned since planning for the jubilee started - which would have been a number of years ago, these things aren't quick to organize - particularly in Britain. In turn, that tells you about the latency in the administration of Microsoft.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    19. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by jd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Constitutionally, the monarch is strictly forbidden from talking about policy in public. The government is legally entitled to kick the monarch out of office for such an offense and has attempted to extend that to Prince Charles any number of times. The monarch also has no right to vote and no right to own personal property (they merely have the right to use the property held in trust for the monarchy), so they definitely have fewer rights.

      Yes, Labour changed the holiday, which shows you just how much advance notice Microsoft had and thus the viscosity of the molasses they call management.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    20. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn! You beat me to it!

    21. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away Google shill, stop this trolling BS.

    22. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The Royal family gets £40m from the government, but the land they hand over is worth £200m. "Money-sinks"? Hardly. Quite the opposite.

    23. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn't make them a shill.

    24. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The Royal family gets £40m from the government, but the land they hand over is worth £200m. "Money-sinks"? Hardly. Quite the opposite.

      5 years ago, a 20%pa ROI from land ownership was probably considered reasonable. These days, not so much.

    25. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope whichever microsoft competitor is paying you to post this crap is paying you enough.

    26. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by geedubyoo · · Score: 2

      The Queen does have the right to vote, she just chooses not to.

      "Although the law relating to elections does not specifically prohibit the Sovereign from voting in a general election or local election, it is considered unconstitutional for the Sovereign and his or her heir to do so."
      http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/QueenandGovernment/Queenandvoting.aspx (The Official Website of the British Monarchy)

    27. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by geedubyoo · · Score: 1

      The UK isn't "in the middle of the North Sea", it's next to the North Sea. Heck, the UK isn't in the middle of anything.

    28. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you've been modded as insightful, theres nothing insightful or informative about your post. Unless giving orders about what to with their holiday, an incorrect explanation of why the date changed. A perhaps misplaced defence of Microsoft considering they're providing the calendar functions and incorrect assumption of slashdot articles.

      The jubilee is an anniversary of the queens coronation, so its not doing something else, its more there is a celebration the following week and the dates been moved for peoples convenience. Also bank holiday's are Monday's AFAIK so merely extend the weekend, most workplaces can still require you to book the days off irregardless (and come out of a total entitlement), so would be unnaffected anyway.

      I would agree with it not being an issue for Microsoft if the article didn't specifically mention Live services (which weren't corrected). The 2010 calendars have been corrected and if office updates had been applied, many of the others.

      Last but not least, Slashdot commonly has news relating specifically to a country other than the USA or UK, every single day, which is why I like it.

    29. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at his user profile he's only got two posts, the first one being the GP of this thread.

      So?

      Troll's typically create accounts to create posts. Generally speaking its pretty evident someone is a troll or has troll-like tendancies if the first time they feel the urge to create an account it is because they want to write something negative or attacking someone. I'm sure this didn't have to be explained.

    30. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? In coding the system to determine holiday dates, how would they at the time of encoding know that the queen would feel like throwing a party next week?

      Being from a certain family means you can just change holidays at will? Fuck that.

      Between excessive surveillance and governmental nonsense like this, I am so glad I don't live in the UK.

      When it is every 10 years. Yes.

    31. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Xest · · Score: 1

      Your post is 100% full of fail because:

      1) The queen didn't postpone or cancel the holiday, the government did

      2) It is Microsoft's fault because no one else has both access to the source code and the ability to push out a correction other than Microsoft

      3) Yes it would be mentioned if it was another country, I recall a number of stories on this sort of topic for countries as small as Samoa, and Tokelau. Here, have some:

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/12/30/1810227/samoa-and-tokelau-are-skipping-december-30th

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/01/03/1312209/2016-bug-hits-text-messages-payment-processing

      http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/11/01/136235/iphone-alarm-bug-leads-to-mass-european-sleep-in

      4) There's no such country as the United Kingdom Kingdom

    32. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As pointed out by others, it was the government, and not the current one either, that made the decision. And it was only postponed by a week and also combined with an extra day.

      I'm no monarchist but where else would you get an extra day off in recognition of someone else's length of service?

    33. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Being from a certain family means you can just change holidays at will? Fuck that.

      No, our government decided to provide an extra bank holiday this year to mark the Queen's diamond jubilee. As a result the normal date for the late May bank holiday was pushed back a week to give us two bank holidays in a row.

      I'm not a monarchist, but I certainly don't object to an additional bank holiday.

      Oh, and anyone who depends on a fucking computer program to tell them when to go to work deserves all the trouble they get. I mean, if your iPhone alarm fails to wake you up in the morning, do you just take a day off without telling anyone?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The monarch also has ... no right to own personal property"

      Do you always talk out of your arse or only on quantum holidays?

    35. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      how would they at the time of encoding know that the queen would feel like throwing a party next week?

      Probably because a monarch's diamond jubilee is not a party thrown on a whim. It is a celebration of 60 years in power. So.. Microsoft could've known this was coming for basically its entire existence. The plans have hardly been state secrets.

      The extra day's bank holiday has been official for a couple of years at most, not since Microsoft came into existence

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    36. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn't make them a shill.

      Unless you're pro-Microsoft, then you are automatically (a) a shill (b) a troll and (c) a faggot, if I have been reading slashdot correctly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:5 Informative)???

      The monarch can vote, the government cannot remove the monarch and the monarch doesn't speak about policy by convention only.

    38. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by MattBecker82 · · Score: 1

      (Score:5 Informative)???

      The monarch can vote, the government cannot remove the monarch and the monarch doesn't speak about policy by convention only.

      However, an Act of Parliament can remove the monarch, as it did in 1936.

    39. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      Except a recession. Again.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    40. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should reach out to the AC "Stay on topic" 'softie up above. It sounds like he's willing to "work" with guys who enjoy Microsoft products.

    41. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by gdr · · Score: 2
      First sentence of the article linked to (emphasis mine):

      "His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 (1 Edw. 8 & 1 Geo. 6 c. 3) was the Act of the British Parliament that allowed King Edward VIII to abdicate the throne ..."

      The Act did not remove the monarch, it allowed him to abdicate.

    42. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by gdr · · Score: 1

      Sorry that should be the first sentence of the Wikipedia article: "His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936".

    43. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you hardcode shit like that you're doing it wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Don't klnow where you're getting your figures from.

      http://www.royal.gov.uk/pdf/Civil%20List%20expenditure%202006.pdf says 12 M.

      And that's annual. As to the land, it's the first I've heard about it. Are handing it over every year? Because if not the comparison is pointless, like most of the shit you post.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    45. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The government is legally entitled to kick the monarch out of office for such an offense and has attempted to extend that to Prince Charles any number of times.

      +5 bullshit

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Hillgiant · · Score: 2

      I propose a new rating "-1 Drunk"

      It should have similar consequences as "+1 Funny" with respect to Karma. In essence: "Bless him. He has no idea what he is talking about. We will hide his embarrassment as quickly as possible."

      --
      -
    47. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Middle" seems to imply that we already half way through recession to go. So at least you're an optimist :)

    48. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by hippo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly, it's taken about 60 years to organize this Diamond Jubilee, who knows how long the next one will take to arrive.

    49. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by grcumb · · Score: 2

      Exactly, it's taken about 60 years to organize this Diamond Jubilee, who knows how long the next one will take to arrive.

      Well, the last diamond jubilee was about 117 years ago, so they seem to have got the latency down by almost 50%. I expect the next one in less than 30 years if this trend continues.

      (Slashdot, the playground for false statisticians for centuries!)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    50. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by jd · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, the playground for false statisticians for centuries!

      Only 73.914% of the time.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    51. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by MattBecker82 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, my example was a fail. Nonetheless, I believe the general point stands that an Act of Parliament could remove the monarch (since an AoP can change the rules of succession, as has been proposed by the present government, it follows that one could remove the monarch or the monarchy entirely too).

      However, passing of a bill into law (so that it becomes an AoP) requires royal assent, so it's perhaps technically the case that parliament can't unilaterally force the monarch from the throne. Still, the mechanism exists so that if there is sufficient political will, it could happen, and we really couldn't claim to have a constitutional monarchy if the monarch refused to abide by any clearly expressed political will.

    52. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't get rid of them. We Australians find it much cheaper to outsource our head of state to the heavily subsidised UK Royal Family.

    53. Re:This is what happens with kings/queens by Occams · · Score: 1

      "no right to own personal property " Rubbish. Her personal wealth makes ERII is one of the richest women in the world.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
  2. meh by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "potentially"? How about you find some git that skipped work because of it.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:meh by wildstoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obvious troll is obvious.

      Then again, I'm reading Slashdot at work, so you're "potentially" correct.

    2. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pard'n me govnor, what the bloody hell is a "git"?

    3. Re:meh by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but driving a block and picking up soda and candy can be done during a commercial break. If you had to walk it, the commercials would be over by the time you got back and you'd miss some of the show. There's no commercial break long enough for that... Yet!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:meh by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why it doesn't even make the news when something like that happens... /trollfeeding

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:meh by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

      The British are a lazy people, so it shouldn't be too difficult.

      We're so lazy, our smoke alarms come with a snooze button.

      Jokes aside, it's called Minimum Effort Efficiency.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    6. Re:meh by andsens · · Score: 1

      Linus Torvalds is... or so he says.

    7. Re:meh by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 2

      Some of the ads on youtube are starting to get to about the right length!

    8. Re:meh by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's a generic insult with no more specific meaning than that the subject of the insult is an unlikeable person.

    9. Re:meh by oPless · · Score: 1

      *raises hand*

      I skipped work today.

      Google listed today as a day off too, and at some point redacted it. But my iPhone (and android devices) held on to the notion that it was still a bank holiday.

    10. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the most amazing fact about you glens is that SOME of you are able to speak without opening the mouth or heaven forbid, move the jaw in any way.
      It's astonishing to squeeze entire words trough closed teeth always sounding like being still asleep. Lazy to the max.

    11. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show what a mess the American media is in /troll x2

    12. Re:meh by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      that's why it doesn't even make the news when something like that happens

      If it's not an unarmed teenager, it doesn't. You would probably be shocked by the number of homicides in the US not deemed newsworthy on any given day.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    13. Re:meh by bobamu · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm going to write a treatise on how you just offended 60+ million people. Ah, on second thoughts, too much effort, *reaches for cup of tea*

    14. Re:meh by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, no, I suppose I wouldn't. For example, I remember when Washington, D.C., the area where I live most of the time, was the "murder capital of the world", with an average of more than one per day, yet most weren't deemed newsworthy. (I also live part time in a country where any murder dominates the news for at least a week, but then it's a very small country.)

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    15. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We're not lazy, we're just resting after 400 years of being awesome and waiting for the rest of the world to catch up.

    16. Re:meh by lourd_baltimore · · Score: 2

      Walking to buy a drink and some candy, rather than driving, may also incur the death penalty as provided by your neighborhood watch captain.

    17. Re:meh by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing there are people anywhere that are significantly lazier then a lot of my fellow citizens.

      Speaking as a Brit, yes, yes I am. Uh, I mean, we are.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't be stoned on Pot and attack the neighborhood watch guy when he demands to know who you are and why you're cutting through the community.

    19. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're really lazy, why don't you just order pizza?

    20. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with a spot of milk.

    21. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, any Brit worth a shit left over the past four centuries. All that's left are the lazy, the retarded, and the inbred descendents of royalty.

      Like the Beckhams.

    22. Re:meh by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Have we actually seen pictures of Trayvon Martin as he looked on that day?

      Many sites have been showing that the 'cute' picture used by most news outlets were several years old and from a time before Trayvon got into the 'gangsta' lifestyle; pictures of him with gold teeth, tattoos and gang paraphernalia has appeared. If he looked anything like that when Zimmerman encountered him, he's be more than justified shooting him IMHO.

      After all, it was a Florida black youth gang that set the record in brutality against non-gang victims; this gang held up rental cars leaving the Miami Airport, and for convenience they always shot the victims dead before robbing them ("it was easier that way"). The gang was caught after the tourist industry in Florida suffered badly, the leader fried in the electric chair long ago (he did most of the killings) and the rest are gonna look at the world through bars for the rest of their lives, serving dozens of life sentences without parole consecutively.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    23. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, any Brit worth a shit left over the past four centuries. All that's left are the lazy, the retarded, and the inbred descendents of royalty.

      Like the Beckhams.

      I think you'll find it's the shit we got rid of to places like America and Australia, countries founded respectively with religious maniacs, and useless convicts.

    24. Re:meh by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Many sites have been showing that the 'cute' picture used by most news outlets were several years old and from a time before Trayvon got into the 'gangsta' lifestyle; pictures of him with gold teeth, tattoos and gang paraphernalia has appeared. If he looked anything like that when Zimmerman encountered him, he's be more than justified shooting him IMHO.

      If this kid was so much of a fucking "gangsta", it's truly odd that he was unarmed and ended up shot dead by someone who wasn't. That's rather more like the victims in your second, entirely unrelated paragraph.

      Even here in the UK where it's much harder to get guns, any genuine gangster/gang member would probably be armed with something.

      Wearing stupid clothes and listening to shitty music does not make you a "gansta." Your comment makes as much sense as saying that you are justified in shooting any motorcyclist because they look like they might be a Hell's Angel, or anyone with short hair and a tattoo because they're probably members of a Neo Nazi organisation.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:meh by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      *raises hand*

      I skipped work today.

      Google listed today as a day off too, and at some point redacted it. But my iPhone (and android devices) held on to the notion that it was still a bank holiday.

      Did it not occur to you to wonder why no one at work the previous Friday said "enjoy the bank holiday" or anything?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. I see you too have taken to the Kool-Aide. Well done, sir. Well done indeed.

      Trayvon was not the "innocent" little victim in this case that the media decided to portray him as to boost their ratings and to rile the public up. Go through the REAL evidence, not the doctored photos/video.

      What is all very interesting in this case is WHY did his parents, who were so concerned that they hired a publicist, didn't report him missing till a few days later...?

  3. Still better than the error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sent us back to 1792. I couldn't even have toast since sliced bread hadn't been invented yet.

    1. Re:Still better than the error by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sent us back to 1792. I couldn't even have toast since sliced bread hadn't been invented yet.

      You could have invented it yourself, and then been the inventor of the greatest thing until [insert cool thing here].

    2. Re:Still better than the error by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That sent us back to 1792. I couldn't even have toast since sliced bread hadn't been invented yet.

      You are aware that you can cut bread with a knife, into slice, yourself?

      Just wondering.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems odd to post this *after* normal work hours in the UK. Did someone actually complain about this?

    1. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      Normal work hours in the UK are 9am to 5.30pm, with an hour for lunch (this is typical of every job I have worked, non-retail). This was posted at about 5.15pm - just before the end of the normal working day for most people.

    2. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think he comes off just fine. Most people would consider 5pm to be a nice early finish. Hell, I don't finish until after 8!

    3. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone was probably keeping quiet until the end of the day in case anyone noticed they'd left and were sunning themselves in the park. (Britain currently having a rare heatwave so our sky is a delightful Blue instead of Gray).

    4. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Seems odd to post this *after* normal work hours in the UK. Did someone actually complain about this?

      If they posted it before we would have had a great excuse not to turn out

    5. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work 8:30 to 4:30, I've never had a job where I was expected to work past 5 on a normal day. Maybe it depends where you are, or what area you work in, but I wouldn't say 9-5:30 was normal.

    6. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Now who is being the pedantic asshole...

      You just cant leave alone, can you? I'd go get that seen to if I were you - you have the larger attitude issue here.

    7. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by horza · · Score: 1

      It's pedantic because it's unlikely anybody will be working in an empty building with the lights off until 5.15pm, then read on Slashdot ir's a bank holiday and suddenly feel a bit of a fool and realise they can go home instead of waiting 15 more minutes.

      Phillip.

    8. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      Blue,
      Blue,
      Ah! so that's what that colour is called. I had been beginning to worry.
      Unfortunately wikipedia has nothing on "That strange yellow ball in the sky".

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    9. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      We never have gray skies.

      We often have grey ones.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    10. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't want me to reply to you, why reply to my comment in the first place? Couldn't you just ignore it? I simply responded after seeing you clearly did not understand why a few people are finding you to be pedant. And on top of that, you declare that I have an attitude problem simply because I pointed out what I believe is a flaw in yours. If you want to leave this alone, then just don't reply. Don't cover your own inadequacies by pushing them onto others.

    11. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people would consider 5pm to be a nice early finish. Hell, I don't finish until after 8!

      And others have lives...

    12. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2

      "That strange yellow ball in the sky".

      Don't worry; it's just an advert for the Olympic flame. It will certainly go away before the games start.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    13. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard office hours are deemed 9-5:30. Have been for at least the past 24 years I have been working. Pretty sure they were the same for my Dad. I've worked other hours (7:30-4, on call shifts etc.) but "office hours" always means the same. Core hours sometimes means 10-4:30 with the option of either doing 8-4:30, 9-5:30 or 10-6:30 (everyone is on 10-4:30, hence core hours).

    14. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They are? Almost everywhere I've considered working, the standard hours are 9-5, with a half hour lunch break. Modulo flexitime and occasional places that displace the start and finish times by the same amount, they seem to be pretty standard. I think you're working 2.5 hours a week longer than most British people, but well done to your manager for convincing you that it's normal.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work 7 to 3.30. This means I spend 6-4.30 doing work-related stuff such as travelling. When I worked 9-5, I spent 7 to 7 doing work-related stuff.

    16. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Spudley · · Score: 1

      Normal work hours in the UK are 9am to 5.30pm, with an hour for lunch (this is typical of every job I have worked, non-retail). This was posted at about 5.15pm - just before the end of the normal working day for most people.

      ....So I guess you weren't highly productive in that last half hour, then?

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    17. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My civil-service days were basically 7.5 hours (0900-1700 with 30 mins lunch, but with flexitime). My private sector experiences are 0830-1750 "fixed", with an hour lunch (too much), with an expectation of extra when needed - including for training which seems to be often out of hours (eg 17.30-19.30). However, from talking with a lot of people I think its related to wage and job function - you are very lucky if you get to work 35 hours a week and still get close to a 6 figure salary for example.

    18. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by isorox · · Score: 1

      Most people would consider 5pm to be a nice early finish. Hell, I don't finish until after 8!

      And others have lives...

      I often work til 8pm, but on those days I don't start until 2pm. Far too much to do to be in the office in the morning.

    19. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was after 8 hours and 15 minutes of work hours, and before 15 minutes of them.

      He was right for a far greater range than you, so fuck of yourself.

    20. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Xest · · Score: 1

      My working hours have tended to be more 8:30 - 4:30, with one place letting us do 8:30 - 4pm on Fridays with 30minute lunch.

      But all except that job have offered flexi-time, so these are the kind of hours I tend to do, it's nice to be able to go home and actually have an evening, even if it means getting out of bed a bit earlier.

      I've never worked anywhere that's asked for more than a 37 or 37.5 hour week, though I have often tended to do more off my own back it's always been optional, and I opted to do it because for the most part I've always liked my jobs though that might have something to do with the fact that if I ever get to the point where I don't like my job, I leave and go elsewhere rather than sit and whine about how I'm entitled to like my job and get paid more without having to put any effort into achieving exactly that like most of the working population seems to do.

      Retail workers tend to work longer hours, my partner manages a number of stores and she would tend to do hours more like the GP implied as would her staff. The fact he mentioned retail is probably perhaps why he's been blinkered into this mindset - if he started out as a shop assistant or whatever then it's no suprise he thinks those hours are normal.

    21. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, 9-5 with half hour lunch break it the same number of hours as 9-5.30 with an hour lunch break.

      The only time I've worked 9-5 has been when supporting factory computers (the factory workers worked 8-4; this was a compromise).

      About half my jobs have been 9-6.

      I don't think there is a standard, de facto or otherwise.

      Also, I enjoy my job so regularly work beyond 6.

    22. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Normal work hours in the UK are 9am to 5.30pm, with an hour for lunch (this is typical of every job I have worked, non-retail). This was posted at about 5.15pm - just before the end of the normal working day for most people.

      I fail to see your point. It's still a bit late in the day to find out you've cocked up so badly.

      With our new employer-friendly employment laws, I imagine you could probably sack someone for taking an unauthorised day's absence and spin it as gross misconduct.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the people who turned up for work on a Monday when it was actually a bank holiday who would have the problem. It's the ones who didn't turn up when it wasn't who will potentially be facing disciplinary action.

      "I didn't go to work because Outlook told me not to" ranks up with "the dog ate my homework" on the list of unconvincing excuses. You'd be better off lying and saying you were too sick to crawl to your phone or something.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I work 8:30 to 4:30, I've never had a job where I was expected to work past 5 on a normal day. Maybe it depends where you are, or what area you work in, but I wouldn't say 9-5:30 was normal.

      The average UK office working hours are 37 1/2 a week, which works out to 9 to 5.30 with an hour for lunch, even though no one really takes lunches for that long any more.

      When I started work in the Eighties, most people took an hour + (liquid) lunch and worked until 5.30 as that was when the pubs re-opened...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I work 7 to 3.30. This means I spend 6-4.30 doing work-related stuff such as travelling. When I worked 9-5, I spent 7 to 7 doing work-related stuff.

      It must be an American thing, I can't think of many people in the UK who would willingly take 2 hours commuting each way, every day.

      Also, most UK firms wouldn't be open at 7 anyway.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They are? Almost everywhere I've considered working, the standard hours are 9-5, with a half hour lunch break. Modulo flexitime and occasional places that displace the start and finish times by the same amount, they seem to be pretty standard. I think you're working 2.5 hours a week longer than most British people, but well done to your manager for convincing you that it's normal.

      OP may have a full hour lunch break, don't forget. That did used to be the norm, which is why 9 to 5.30 is still generally considered the standard working week.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Seems a bit late to post this! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      you are very lucky if you get to work 35 hours a week and still get close to a 6 figure salary for example.

      You are very lucky to get close to a 6 figure salary in the UK full stop.

      All the stories about people in the City earning millions in bonuses tend to disguise the fact that the average UK salary is less than 25K GBP (and quite alot less depending on where you live).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Why not bill Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not bill Microsoft for all those "lost" work hours?

    1. Re:Why not bill Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're unrelated to the stupidity of some of the people of England.

  6. Microsoft CAN do this. by nurhussein · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by advance-software · · Score: 0

      > two of the world’s leading universities, Cambridge & Manchester.

    2. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by RDW · · Score: 2

      This bit doesn't look quite so funny now:

      'One change will immediately be instituted by Microsoft. "Currently students attend English universities yet they do not pay tuition. This is ridiculous. If students in the U.S. pay $50,000 to attend Harvard, Yale or Stanford, British students should do the same to attend Oxbridge." What about those students who cannot afford to pay such a high level of tuition? Gates responded, "Look, I am not totally heartless. Microsoft will be introducing its lifetime earnings program. They can attend any British university for free as long as they agree to pay us 20 percent of their annual earnings for the rest of their lives. I'm even willing to offer a one year moratorium after graduation."'

    3. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by ais523 · · Score: 2

      For non-Brits who don't know: the paragraph in question, although it was written as a joke, is turning out to be surprisingly accurate (the numbers aren't 100% spot on, but the basic concept is). Fortunately, the earnings tax goes away after you've paid off enough money, but it can still last quite a while.

      There were student riots over this last year (not the big riots in London, smaller ones in individual universities).

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
    4. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by isorox · · Score: 1

      For non-Brits who don't know: the paragraph in question, although it was written as a joke, is turning out to be surprisingly accurate (the numbers aren't 100% spot on, but the basic concept is). Fortunately, the earnings tax goes away after you've paid off enough money, but it can still last quite a while.

      There were student riots over this last year (not the big riots in London, smaller ones in individual universities).

      When I was at uni, you had to fork out money up front for tuition (£1100 a year).

      Now, you don't. You effectivly pay a higher rate of income tax. Another way would be to say those brickies and sparks that don't go to university pay a lower rate of income tax.

      Why should a coal miner, or perpetual student, subsidise the education of some city lawyers and bankers?

    5. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by jd · · Score: 1

      You pay twice. You pay the interest on the loan AND you pay for being in a higher tax bracket. On top of that, since there's two groups collecting these taxes, you're paying double the overhead.

      The correct thing would be to determine how much the educational system alters the economy, adjust the higher tax brackets accordingly, abolish loans and re-establish the grant system. You'd end up paying less (since you pay for fewer staff to collect the money), the system becomes simpler (one point of collection, not two) and universities no longer inflate prices to give the illusion of being better (which is a perverse consequence of supply-side economics) but rather would need to charge according to impact.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by RDW · · Score: 2

      Why should a coal miner, or perpetual student, subsidise the education of some city lawyers and bankers?

      I'm descended from coal miners. They were people who cared about education; they built libraries in their working men's halls, organised festivals of music and culture, and wanted the best for their children. I think they would have been delighted to know that free university education was, for a few decades at least, available to any of their descendents who were able to take advantage of it. I think they would have been deeply disappointed that the idea of higher education as a public good, which allowed young people to develop their full potential without fear of debt, would soon be replaced by a system of career mortgages (to add to the huge housing mortgages that graduates will now also be paying).

      We've played a pretty nasty trick on the current generation. Those of us who received free higher education did so in the expectation that our taxes would fund the next generation of students (and since we had degrees, we'd probably be earning higher salaries and paying more taxes). But it turns out we'll (supposedly) be able to get away with not paying for them after all, since they'll now have to cover their fees themselves. Hurrah for us!

    7. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm liking the cut of your comments' jib in this post. Nicely done, squire.

    8. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Why should a coal miner, or perpetual student, subsidise the education of some city lawyers and bankers?

      Because I want a meritocracy.

      If she is smart enough to benefit from a university education then I do not want worries about finance to affect her decision to go into further education.

      What the taxpayer should be deciding (via his elected representatives) is how many places he wants to fund.

      There's still a place for private higher education if there's unfulfilled demand but, given that in the UK you could get one of the best educations money can buy for free, the business case for private education (other than for foreign students) didn't add up. Unfortunately, I can see Oxbridge going private in my lifetime, something that would have denied me the opportunity of going.

      Of course, any utopia has its problems, and one of the significant problems the UK had in my day (matriculated Oxford 1989) was that Oxbridge and a few other redbrick universities where heavily overrepresented by public[1] school students and it's not obvious how much that was due to the public school system filtering off the cream early and how much was due to the public school system being better set up to train students to get through the Oxbridge selection system. (I came though the state education system but I was relatively unusual)

      [1] In the UK, public schools are fee paying, state schools are free.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    9. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why should a coal miner, or perpetual student, subsidise the education of some city lawyers and bankers?

      They don't. What happens is, you give everyone a free educattion, and then some people who end up with really well paid jobs pay a lot of fucking income tax on those earnings compared with a jobless student.

      Seems simple enough to me.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Microsoft CAN do this. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Public schools have tow purposes: to ensure a basic education for posh thickos sufficient to get them into their daddy's friends business somewhere, and to ensure that the intelligen posh kids get most of the best Oxbridge places. That is why people spend money to send their kids there.

      They should be abolished like the monestaries, simple as that.

      There is absolutely no theoretical or practical justification for allowing your future prospects to be broadly mapped out [*] by the amoutn of money you happen to be born into.

      {*} Yes, obviously there are exceptions.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Oh, dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...well, luckily in GMT the work day is over by now.

    1. Re:Oh, dear... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      We're on BST at the moment, it's 16:30 here.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  8. My Dilbert Calender by tmosley · · Score: 3, Funny

    My Dilbert calender says today was a holiday in the UK as well. DAMN YOU SCOTT ADAMS!

    1. Re:My Dilbert Calender by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Dilbert has stopped being funny about 5 years ago, I'm surprised the calendar only now caught up with being useless.
      Of course, probably the calendar has the best-of series. Last one I had contained some really old strips.

      When I want to remember how awesome Dilbert was, I go back to 90s strips.

  9. Real story: people are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    So the real story here is that people are so stupid that they believe whatever a computer tells them.

    1. Re:Real story: people are stupid by camperdave · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Standing there alone
      The ship is waiting
      All systems are go
      "Are you sure?"
      Control is not convinced
      But the computer
      has the evidence
      No need to abort
      The countdown starts

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  10. So what? by tehlinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the brits don't already know their holiday was moved, why should they expect MS to be on top of that?

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    1. Re:So what? by _0x783czar · · Score: 2

      I agree, I mean... I love to laugh at Microsoft blunders as much as the next guy, but I don't see this as anything to write home about...

      --
      ~theCzar
    2. Re:So what? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      If anything this is more the fault of the government for making the change without enough time for software makers to fix it, or at least not deciding to make the change well enough in advance so they don't have to change it at all.

      Though I can't find anything that lists when exactly this change was made.

      Littered throughout the comments are other tech having the same problem.

    3. Re:So what? by AdamVero · · Score: 1

      Many brits knew when the extra holiday was but maybe did not know the usual one was cancelled. I have read various stories about people booking hotels for a long weekend away only to later realise they would need a day of leave to do this. MS had more than 18 months warning about this but took a huge amount of time to deliver anything resembling a fix, and to this day have not published any details about this (the details for sp1 don't even mention this was broken, let alone that it was fixed). The bigger issue was that the errors were not just about one little island taking a day off, but about at least 23 countries having incorrect holidays for basic tings like Easter as well. And MS still have not bothered to fix all the missing Bank Holidays around Christmas and New Year (when the normal date falls on a weekend).

  11. Finally, a real.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows Genuine Advantage

  12. Lessee here.... by CajunArson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Google calendar has the same issue which is more embarrassing since Google calendar is online by definition and can be fixed more easily than outlook.

    2. Apparently you can download an updated holidays file and patch Outlook.

    3. Now that we've had our daily Microsoft-is-the-stupidest-and-evilest-company-on-the-planet-for-not-accurately-predicting-an-arbitrary-holiday-date-change-years-in-advance post, I'd like to see some more stories about how Americans are stupid and evil and some scientific studies showing that Christians are genetically inferior to the Atheist master race.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:Lessee here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. Now that we've had our daily Microsoft-is-the-stupidest-and-evilest-company-on-the-planet-for-not-accurately-predicting-an-arbitrary-holiday-date-change-years-in-advance post, I'd like to see some more stories about how Americans are stupid and evil and some scientific studies showing that Christians are genetically inferior to the Atheist master race.

      You might want to get that persecution complex looked at. I realize you're trying to be funny, but.. you've got a chip on your shoulder about something here.

    2. Re:Lessee here.... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      1. Google calendar has the same issue which is more embarrassing since Google calendar is online by definition and can be fixed more easily than outlook.

      Google's getting it right for me - of course, I didn't check this morning so they may have fixed it at the 11th hour...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:Lessee here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, great, you're persecuting someone with a persecution complex about their persecution complex? That doesn't usually help.

    4. Re:Lessee here.... by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      They did. Eventually.

    5. Re:Lessee here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, great, you're persecuting someone with a persecution complex about their persecution complex? That doesn't usually help.

      Naah, but it's usually good for some LOLs.

    6. Re:Lessee here.... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      3. Now that we've had our daily Microsoft-is-the-stupidest-and-evilest-company-on-the-planet-for-not-accurately-predicting-an-arbitrary-holiday-date-change-years-in-advance post, I'd like to see some more stories about how Americans are stupid and evil and some scientific studies showing that Christians are genetically inferior to the Atheist master race.

      Too much work. Can't we just bitch about the /. "editors"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:Lessee here.... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      They did. Eventually.

      ^ this. When I first spotted it (last week, during which I thought the coming weekend was a bank-holiday weekend**) I did a search and discovered a report for this very issue.... from last year. You'd think they'd learn!

      Also, even though it has been corrected in Google Calendar, my Android now has two "Spring Bank Holiday" Mondays in succession! If there's a way to remove the erroneous one, it evades me.

      ** Although the weather was nice so obviously it could not possibly be a bank-holiday weekend!

    8. Re:Lessee here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they called the Google Calendar developer at home...

    9. Re:Lessee here.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      They're both trying very hard; can't you say anything positive? ;-)

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    10. Re:Lessee here.... by Xest · · Score: 1

      The thing I took away from your post is that you're most likely a very bitter Christian American, who feels the world is out to get him, though I'm not sure what your point was other than that.

    11. Re:Lessee here.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Oh, great, you're persecuting someone with a persecution complex about their persecution complex? That doesn't usually help.

      It's only a persecution complex if no one's actually persecuting you. If they are, that's persecution.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Lessee here.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see some more stories about how Americans are stupid and evil and some scientific studies showing that Christians are genetically inferior to the Atheist master race.

      I see what you did there. Nice troll, X-boy.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Lessee here.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      my Android now has two "Spring Bank Holiday" Mondays in succession! If there's a way to remove the erroneous one, it evades me.

      How about ignoring the one you know is wrong? It's a computer, not She Who Must Be Obeyed.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Lessee here.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The thing I took away from your post is that you're most likely a very bitter Christian American, who feels the world is out to get him, though I'm not sure what your point was other than that.

      I think his point was that he was a very bitter Christian American, who feels the world is out to get him. He was looking for sympathy from the slashdot hordes of very bitter, white, male, middle class Americans, who feel the world is out to get them.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. In their defense... by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Funny

    but the holiday was postponed for a week to coincide with the Queen's diamond jubilee

    In their defense, I must point out that the Queen of England writes terrible VBScript code. It probably is still being reviewed. If she wants to postpone a national holiday, she needs to get her changes committed at least 2 weeks prior to the hotfix release date.

    1. Re:In their defense... by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      England no longer exists as a Kingdom ever since the 1707 Act of Union. The Kingdom is of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and so the Queen should be more accurately called informally the Queen of Britain or the Queen of the United Kingdom.

    2. Re:In their defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or even more accurately...
      Queen Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of this Realm and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

      But that's a bit of a mouthful.

    3. Re:In their defense... by norfolkboy · · Score: 0

      Or even more accurately...
      Queen Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of this Realm and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

      But that's a bit of a mouthful.

      She is not Queen Elizabeth the Second, no matter how much she may wish to be.

      She is Queen Elizabeth the Second of England, or simply Queen Elizabeth.

      In Scotland, we have never had a Queen Elizabeth the First, as QE I was queen of England only, long before the Act of Union. This is why Royal Mail postboxes in Scotland show ER and not ERII. Following incidents in the 1950s that saw postboxes with the EIIR cypher being attacked by militant Scottish nationalists who objected to the term Queen Elizabeth the Second on the basis that Scotland had never had a Queen Elizabeth the First, the then GPO undertook to use only ER in Scotland.

    4. Re:In their defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your missing the point Did they give the SERFS an extra holiday to celebrate the event oh no that costs money. They just reused an existing one and told us to be greatfull!

    5. Re:In their defense... by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Um. Wasn't her mom also named Queen Elizabeth, and wasn't said mother a queen consort of Ireland? I'm having trouble understanding why that would not make her Queen Elizabeth the Second with her mother also being Elizabeth.

      I will admit my history on this subject is so bad that I could be dead wrong. It has been a great many years since I learned about British royalty and all that.

    6. Re:In their defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They moved one holiday *and* gave another. That's why there are two consecutive national holidays (Monday and Tuesday).

    7. Re:In their defense... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      No, they added an extra holiday, but since there was one already scheduled a week earlier they moved it so that we get a four-day weekend instead of two three-day weekends.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:In their defense... by dkf · · Score: 1

      Wasn't her mom also named Queen Elizabeth, and wasn't said mother a queen consort of Ireland?

      Her mother was indeed Queen Elizabeth, but wasn't a reigning queen of anywhere (her husband was king). The mother was considered to be Queen of the whole of Ireland for a while (through her marriage); Ireland only became a republic in 1949. The daughter was never queen of any part of Ireland other than the 6 counties that make up Northern Ireland (which remains part of the UK).

      None of which is particularly important in the grand scheme of things.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    9. Re:In their defense... by MattBecker82 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the regnal numbering of English/Scottish/British Kings & Queens is a bit messed up, e.g. pop quiz trick question: How many Kings of England or Britain have reigned under the name Edward? Answer: Eleven (the eight "numbered" ones since the Norman conquest, plus three before: Elder, Martyr, Confessor).

      Back to the subject, I believe that at some point post-union it was decided to number the UK's Kings / Queens according to the maximum of the English / Scottish / British regnal numbers. So the present Queen is Elizabeth II, and the next time there's a King James he'll be James VIII, since there's already been a James VII of Scotland. I can't be bothered to look for a reference to back this up right now, so I'm open to being corrected here.

    10. Re:In their defense... by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      But that's a bit of a mouthful.

      As Lady Di said to James Hewitt.

      Too soon?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:In their defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Scotland lost, England won, so we get to decide what number the Queen is, OK?

    12. Re:In their defense... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      UK centric much?

      She's the Queen of Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis.

  14. cue popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, this will be interesting. So far nobody ever got fired for believing Microsoft...

    1. Re:cue popcorn by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      IIRC, there were some guys at the stock exchange, coincidentally in London.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  15. Excuse by hemo_jr · · Score: 0

    Let us thank those who maintain calendar apps for giving us a quasi-plausible excuse for staying home on a Monday.

  16. Is it actually a problem? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    How many people actually rely on Outlook to tell them what days they have off, particularly something like "Spring Bank Holiday"?

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Is it actually a problem? by brusk · · Score: 1

      I sort of do. I rely on Outlook's holidays to know, for example, whether to expect banks and government offices to be open or when my trash should be put out a day later than usual. My employer (a university) provides an .ics calendar of its schedule--it follows some official holidays but not others. So I need to be aware of both, and generally assume that Outlook's holidays are reliable (though an unusual change like this would likely have been well-publicized).

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    2. Re:Is it actually a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the setting. I work with teams across 16 countries where public holidays are varied in timing and announcement. But, the Exchange Server should be administered competently to prevent false warning.

  17. And.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Memorial Day and not everybody gets the day off work. It's up to you to know which holidays, if any you get off work from.

  18. To err is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to write a long diatribe about human error and consequence in our tech. connected world, but I'll just leave it to this sentiment: if you rely solely on Outlook Calendar for when you have days off, you deserve to look like an idiot for taking off the wrong day.

  19. 2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, & about MS having date problems? They're not alone.

    1. Re:2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference here is that Unix fixed the problem 53 years before it became a problem., contrasted with MS not actually fixing the problem. See the difference?

    2. Re:2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Using 64-bit processors is just a stopgap! What happens in 292 billion years?

    3. Re:2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 64-bit on that page. The poster explicitly stated 32-bit Unix.

    4. Re:2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we haven't switched everything to 64-bit systems by twenty-fucking-thirtyeight, we deserve whatever we get. What's the time_t wraparound on 16-bit UNIX, anyway? Oh, right, nobody cares.

    5. Re:2038-2039 & 32-bit UNIX has a "problem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't the point. 32-bit UNIX systems failing in 2038-2039 is.

  20. UK isn't England by norfolkboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't pay any attention anyway.

    Microsoft insists in referring to England as the UK when in fact they mean England.

    Scotland has different holidays to England, but these aren't available to Scottish users according to MS.

    Last year Windows UK had a UK tour, which only toured English cities. Nothing in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.

    A peeved UK citizen in Scotland.

    1. Re:UK isn't England by Nethead · · Score: 5, Funny

      A peeved UK citizen in Scotland.

      Isn't that statement redundant?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:UK isn't England by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Funny

      not so, not all Scottish UK citizens are peeved, most of them are just drunk.

    3. Re:UK isn't England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can agree that all Scots are pissed.

    4. Re:UK isn't England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh... Stop your whining, They are technically correct. Any time they are in England, they are officially in the UK. If I live in a state in the US and they don't tour my state, I don't get pissy that they didn't hit ALL of the United States. You can always solve that by taking your sovereignty. We did it. Seemed to work well for us. Become sovereign, see the world, get some respect. You may even be able to do it without killing anyone. That would be better than when we chose to do it. Other than that, quit complaining, they are technically correct, whether you like it or not. They are a company operating under a sovereign and they need to show it ALL DUE RESPECT; not just what makes you happy. The Queen is still your ruler, and hence theirs as well. They have no choice but to refer to it as the Queen's government wants it to be referred to as. Don't like it, sorry, the only option is to take your sovereignty. Get that and then you get a chance to bitch; but only if the new government you set up for yourself lets you have that right.

    5. Re:UK isn't England by anlprb · · Score: 1

      Ehh... Stop your whining, They are technically correct. Any time they are in England, they are officially in the UK. If I live in a state in the US and they don't tour my state, I don't get pissy that they didn't hit ALL of the United States. You can always solve that by taking your sovereignty. We did it. Seemed to work well for us. Become sovereign, see the world, get some respect. You may even be able to do it without killing anyone. That would be better than when we chose to do it. Other than that, quit complaining, they are technically correct, whether you like it or not. They are a company operating under a sovereign and they need to show it ALL DUE RESPECT; not just what makes you happy. The Queen is still your ruler, and hence theirs as well. They have no choice but to refer to it as the Queen's government wants it to be referred to as. Don't like it, sorry, the only option is to take your sovereignty. Get that and then you get a chance to bitch; but only if the new government you set up for yourself lets you have that right.

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    6. Re:UK isn't England by norfolkboy · · Score: 1

      Well, that's not a very good comparison.

      If we take the US Tour example, the idea of calling it a US Tour would be laughed at if it toured only one of your many states. This is precisely what Microsoft did in the UK, when they toured only one of the UK countries, and called it a UK tour.

      So if, for example, only Missouri was part of the US Tour, I'm sure most Americans would laugh at it, and point out that it's a Missouri Tour, not a US Tour.

      This is the same situation I have highlighted.

      And as for your rant about getting our own sovereignty, this is precisely what we're in the process of doing.

    7. Re:UK isn't England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We did it".
      Dude, you didn't do shit.

    8. Re:UK isn't England by anlprb · · Score: 1

      If it only hit Missouri, it would still be called a US Tour. It happens all the time. There are 50 of us, not counting protectorates. I don't know of ONE single US tour that hit all 50 States. Come on. It NOT being called a US Tour is silly and just not standard. So, the only way for it to be called a "US Tour" would be to hit all 50 States? It is still the US Tour, as soon as it hits any State in our Union.

      Our states are larger than many of your European countries. Many times, tours will have region events because we are just too big. Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, West Coast, etc... They don't EVER hit all the States.

      I hope you take your sovereignty. Because fundamentally, it is yours and not someone else's to give. Every human is granted by God to be free and independent and not ruled by another. I hope everyone finally sees that. The world would be a better place. Next time I see the vote coming up is 2014 though, and sentiments can change over time. I hope you finally take your right to govern yourselves. Good luck.

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    9. Re:UK isn't England by mfraz74 · · Score: 0

      Don't worry Microsoft can't even release a version of Windows that uses the proper version of English rather than the American version! Favorits, color etc.

    10. Re:UK isn't England by ugglybabee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, Scotland sucks, whatever, but if MS is reporting Holidays that are only observed in England as being observed in "The UK", that's inaccurate. Patriot's Day is only observed in Maine and Massachusetts, but if MS reports that Patriot Day is observed "in the United States", well, that's technically true, but it's not accurate.

    11. Re:UK isn't England by dkf · · Score: 1

      Our states are larger than many of your European countries.

      Being bigger than Belgium isn't something particularly special in the grand scheme of things. (Heck, according to at least one definition, Paris is bigger than Belgium.)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    12. Re:UK isn't England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh... Stop your whining, They are technically correct.

      Wrong. A "UK holiday" is a holiday observed throughout all of the UK. If it meant what you think it means, I could take a day off whenever I wanted and call it a UK holiday.

    13. Re:UK isn't England by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Trust me, most Americans in power only consider CA, NY, and occasionally TX and consider that the entirety of the US. (Politicians also look at IA for a little while.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    14. Re:UK isn't England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the World Series of baseball?

    15. Re:UK isn't England by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      He's peeved because William Wallace stole his day off.

    16. Re:UK isn't England by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I hope you take your sovereignty. Because fundamentally, it is yours and not someone else's to give. Every human is granted by God to be free and independent and not ruled by another.

      So each individual needs to become a sovereign state and we get rid of the idea of countires, states or indeed any association of two or more people altogether?

      I'm not sure you thought that one through very far, although as you're American maybe you're just one of those extreme libertarians that infest slashdot.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  21. day off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only legal implications of a bank holiday is that you cannot be held to pay a debt on that day. there's nothing about a day off. that's a contractual matter between you and your employer. My employer doesn't automatically grant a day off on a bank holiday, if I want it off I have to book it as part of my annual vacation time.

    1. Re:day off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England you retard.

    2. Re:day off? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Bank holidays are not statutory holidays in that sense.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_holiday

      From the Wikipedia entry:

      A bank holiday is a public holiday in the United Kingdom or a colloquialism for public holiday in Ireland. There is no automatic right to time off on these days, although the majority of the population is granted time off work or extra pay for working on these days, depending on their contract.[1]

    3. Re:day off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I'm the OP, and I live in Scotland, where we have to put up with Scottish banks closing on English bank holidays!

    4. Re:day off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody care to guess what the nationality is of the fag who modded the above post down to -1? My guess is he's got pictures of that useless, vampire bitch on the money in his pocket, and that his dental hygiene sucks.

      The worst thing though, is that this is going to keep happening. It's a consequence of having an undead, parasite bitch ruling your country. First they move where the end of a marathon is, because they're too lazy and useless to walk a few feet, and now they're rearranging the calendar. Fuck her, fuck her family, and fuck all those who suck up to her, fanning the flames of delusion that that family matters.

      Every time my country rode in to rescue them from the Germans, (whom we should have let have them!) we were supporting a monarchy. Disgusting, really.

  22. "tricking"? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    if you cant think enough for yourself and don't know when a holiday really is, you have bigger problems.

    Same sorts of people that will drive into a brick wall when the GPS says to turn right.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. can't be! by dittbub · · Score: 1

    No way are we that dependent on MS Outlook.

  24. MS Creates Holidays? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    Wait--who relies on Microsoft to tell when they have off work? Since when is Microsoft the authority? Whatever MS may or may not say about holidays, it's your own fault if you listen to anyone other than your employer as to when you've got off work.

    1. Re:MS Creates Holidays? by busyqth · · Score: 2

      Wait--who relies on Microsoft to tell when they have off work?

      Microsoft employees.

    2. Re:MS Creates Holidays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait--who relies on Microsoft to tell when they have off work?

      I rely on Microsoft to tell me if my foreign clients have holidays and I can procrastinate another day.

    3. Re:MS Creates Holidays? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Smart man.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  25. Even if MS had caught the error and issued a patch by SlithyMagister · · Score: 1

    So following the announcement of the postponement, MS decides to include the updated calendar info in a patch.
    Since the patch isn't a critical or security patch, a large portion of end users -- and a larger portion of systems administrators would not install the patch.

    Still not a news item.
    I gave up on the holidays calendar years ago due to an overabundance of errors -- primarily inclusions of US holidays in the Canada calendar.
    I suspect most Outlook users in the UK did the same.

  26. There's no way we could be tricked by this... by shippers · · Score: 2

    It isn't raining.

    1. Re:There's no way we could be tricked by this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it was too nice a day for a bank holiday. I was at work and I have a sneaking suspicion that there might have been an increased incidence in absenteeism because of the weather and being able to blame Microsoft is just a convenient excuse.

      And of course next week when we get the two day holiday for Liz's length of service award the weather will be twice as shite as a normal bank holiday.

  27. Re:Even if MS had caught the error and issued a pa by busyqth · · Score: 1, Funny

    I gave up on the holidays calendar years ago due to an overabundance of errors -- primarily inclusions of US holidays in the Canada calendar.

    Wait, what's the problem with that?

  28. Re:LOL President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  29. They need the extra day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People could use an extra day off from work to futz around trying to get Winbloz to work properly and to run those virus scans.

  30. us suckers by pointyhat · · Score: 1

    Us windows phone owning suckers in the UK had the same problem. My wife ruined my morning poop wit the news that it wasn't a bank holiday :(

  31. Microsoft always gets GMT/BST wrong by ICantFindADecentNick · · Score: 1

    Microsoft have never really cared about getting calendar details right. Whenever a colonial (maybe should I say yank to really annoy them - even though I know they're not all yanks) sends a meeting request it arrives saying GMT as the timezone for London instead of BST. You would have thought that they could get the hang of daylight saying as they have it too. You actually have to confirm with the other end and say: you know that meeting that says 1:00 pm GMT is really 1:00pm BST or noon GMT (actually I normally translate to whatever zone they're in) e.g 8:00 am EDT.

    1. Re:Microsoft always gets GMT/BST wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] maybe should I say yank to really annoy them - even though I know they're not all yanks.

      It doesn't annoy me... we haven't been a colony of yours for a very long time, limey. In point of fact, last time we had to come rescue your country from being taken over by Germany, we should have made you a colony of ours, and forced you to abandon and impoverish your useless, decrepit, fossilized, coprolite, over-privileged, over-indulged, inbred rulers. That would have been a decent comeuppance for 1812, all that bullshit about taxing us, as well as repaying us for bailing you out the previous time.

      Then we wouldn't have had to read this story about how your vampire parasite is actually publicly celebrating the continuance of her "rule" over her fucking "empire", because she'd just be Mrs. Whatever-the-fuck-her-real-name-is Windsor or Hapsburg or Whatever, private fucking citizen.

      But I guess it makes you Brits feel all warm and important and special, even though you yourselves are nothing to her, her or her family who think they're better than you because some bastard ancestor of theirs conquered your country hundreds of years ago. Christ you're such a bunch of fucking suck-ups. It's two thousand and 'bloody' twelve, time to abolish this 'bollucks' or whatever you call bullshit there, once and for 'sodding' all.

  32. Someting useful from M$ at last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the UK and I worked today, but I get double pay for working public holidays, so thank you M$!

  33. Microsoft and work by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Remember the good old days when Microsoft prevented you from working because its software crashed?

  34. Explains my Windows Phone 7 this morning. by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

    When I picked up my Samsung Omnia 7 this morning it gleefully had on my main screens Calender App that I was on Holiday today. Luckily my wife was on hand to shout at me to get out of bed and get the kids up as she has a Palm Pre.

  35. Microsoft Microsoft gets a pass by ugglybabee · · Score: 1

    I'm all about the Linux, and I'm not a fan of Microsoft. I haven't used Windows since XP, and it hasn't been my primary OS since Win98. But if a regularly scheduled holiday is postponed by decree, does not being informed of that count as "a mistake"? The way I see it, the entity ordering the change is responsible for informing the media, and the mistake was not considering Microsoft (or Google, apparently) part of the media. How often is a holiday temporarily postponed? I can't remember such a thing happening in the US. What we've all learned is that the information infrastructure is not equipped to handle this extraordinary case.

  36. Fuck the bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a fuck about their decrepit, fossilized coprolite throwback to an archaic system of governance based upon inheritance of authority as if people were the personal property of their useless, pampered, over-privileged, over-indulged, inbred "royal" family.

    A celebration of the continued existence and adoration of that parasite by those ignorant peons is to be ignored. I'm with Misro$oft on this one.

  37. Re:LOL Monarchy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The depressing thing is that our anachronistic, out-of-touch, hereditary monarch is probably the sanest and best informed member of our government...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  38. I'll be honest with you by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    In most countries, you are a citizen of that country, and that's that.

    That the UK/ Great Britain/ England/ whatever has a crazy patchwork of overlapping national identities, allegiances, and historical intricacies is your fucking problem, not the world's.

    Don't expect us to know about your petty nationalistic bullshit, keep track of it, or fucking care.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:I'll be honest with you by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Unless my eyes deceive me, you started three sentences with capital letters. Is something wrong?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:I'll be honest with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most countries, you are a citizen of that country, and that's that.

      That the UK/ Great Britain/ England/ whatever has a crazy patchwork of overlapping national identities, allegiances, and historical intricacies is your fucking problem, not the world's.

      Don't expect us to know about your petty nationalistic bullshit, keep track of it, or fucking care.

      So does the USA. Or should I refer to it solely as California and bitch and whine if someone tries to correct me?

  39. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people actually use Outlook?

  40. Microsoft to release patch this Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love these guys...

  41. Re:LOL Monarchy by Spudley · · Score: 2

    The depressing thing is that our anachronistic, out-of-touch, hereditary monarch is probably the sanest and best informed member of our government...

    Not to mention the most popular.

    And the least corrupt.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  42. Re:Even if MS had caught the error and issued a pa by westlake · · Score: 1

    I gave up on the holidays calendar years ago due to an overabundance of errors -- primarily inclusions of US holidays in the Canada calendar.

    Iti s a good bet that a Canadian will live within commuting distance of the American border or will have business and personal contacts in the states.

  43. Re:LOL Monarchy by jd · · Score: 2

    I've a suspicion that some of those aren't independent variables. It would be interesting to know how they connect, because then instead of having to get depressed, you'd know why the rest of government was so flawed on such a consistent basis and what was actually needed in the way of reform. Discovery is only depressing if you never do anything with it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  44. Re:Suck my dick, faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck my dick, faggot.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    We all know how much Microsoft likes to Embrace, then Extend, but that'd be pushing the metaphor a little too far.

  45. Re:Even if MS had caught the error and issued a pa by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Agreed. The Far North states are just as much a part of the good old United States as the Far South states (Mexico & friends).

    We only let them think they are independent (with their own provincial government) so that they are easier to control. It's basically the same deal the UK has with the United States.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  46. The World Series, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how much of the World is involved in the World Series? My point? None that I can think of

  47. Mi part of USA, World Series part of World? by feepcreature · · Score: 1

    If it only hit Missouri, it would still be called a US Tour. It happens all the time.

    Is that how they named the "World Series"?
    To be fair, I guess all the teams are actually in "the world" :)

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  48. Re:LOL Monarchy by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    And the least corrupt.

    When you have ammassed as much wealth as the Queen legally, you don't need to be corrupt.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  49. Britain isn't the UK by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    The article makes no mention of whether those hard-working Britons in Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man get the day off either. :)

  50. Awwww, Microsoft is so cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They try soooo hard.

    So often, they almost get it right.

    Yay them!