Slashdot Mirror


Backyard Brains Can Help Satisfy Your Inner Frankenstein (Video)

Did you know that cockroaches have such large nerves in their legs that you can poke into their legs almost at random and hit a nerve with an electrode so you can stimulate that leg with hip-hop music and and watch it move? And that you can easily order the parts to do this at home or at school? You can. And supplies to perform many other neuroscience experiments, too. Amaze your friends! Learn how neurons work! Gross out squeamish people! All that (and more) is what Backyard Brains is about.

199 comments

  1. Damn! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Damn, that's really neat.
    This is one of those times I wished I lived in the U.S... We just don't get such nice stuff by mail order in Europe.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Damn! by alphatel · · Score: 1

      You can't remove legs from cockroaches in Europe?

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    2. Re:Damn! by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 2

      It looks like you can order this stuff and have it shipped to Europe: http://backyardbrains.com/Order.aspx

      It looks like there are plenty of customers from around the world: http://backyardbrains.com/Contact.aspx

    3. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We just don't have the size cockroaches you have. And using cats or dogs is often frowned upon.

    4. Re:Damn! by Caratted · · Score: 1

      Ratatouille indicates otherwise.

    5. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an Americanish film :P

    6. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just don't have the size cockroaches you have. And using cats or dogs is often frowned upon.

      I'm sure you have plenty of politicians. What's the problem?

  2. That's not funny by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sticking an electrode into a creature and have it twitching to music is not funny, it's cruel.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:That's not funny by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's what I thought, but they cut off the leg (not do it on the cockroach), use juvenile cockroaches that can grow their legs back, and they anesthetize the roach with icewater first.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:That's not funny by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Cockroach or not.

    3. Re:That's not funny by meilinara · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

    4. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you not squash bugs, or use a fly swatter, or use spray to kill wasps/hornets, or use ant traps?

    5. Re:That's not funny by lxs · · Score: 2

      I'm OK with the killing. It's the dismembering for fun and profit that doesn't sit well with me.

    6. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quickly killing an insect is a little different than cutting off its legs for our own amusement.

    7. Re:That's not funny by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Sticking an electrode into a creature and have it twitching to music is not funny, it's cruel.

      Cruel and very, very gross. Yuck. Cockroaches.

    8. Re:That's not funny by 1s44c · · Score: 2

      Do you not squash bugs, or use a fly swatter, or use spray to kill wasps/hornets, or use ant traps?

      I draw a distinction between killing and torturing.

    9. Re:That's not funny by codewarren · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you stuck a venus fly trap for the same purpose, or you stabbed a maple tree for the purpose of making it bleed, is that also cruel? Practically everyone can see that it is cruel to do this to a human, while practically everyone can see it is not cruel to do this to do it to a plant. Somewhere between these, we went from cruel to not cruel. Is there a line, on one side of which is cruel, and on the other is not cruel, or is there a spectrum of cruelty here? And what property of these "creatures" makes it crueler to do so to some, than to others?

    10. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is a circle in hell where this is done in return.

    11. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Give me a break.

      1) Killing it first and then taking its leg, that would be better, I suppose, than taking one from an individual capable of regrowing it?
      2) Far worse has been done to cockroaches, flies, ameobas in the name of research, let alone mice, birds, and monkeys.

      and 3) It's a fing cockroach.

    12. Re:That's not funny by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      The line is: Plant vs Animal. It's really not that hard. Animals have this central processing unit that allows the feeling of pain. We call it a brain. Plants, to the best of our knowledge, feel no pain.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    13. Re:That's not funny by satuon · · Score: 2

      Well, a plant doesn't have a nervous system so it can't feel pain. Insects have a nervous system so they probably feel pain, but then, their nervous system is so simple I doubt their pain has any meaning.

    14. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it is not that simple, not all members of the animal kingdom have enough neurons to "feel" anything. You would not conceder reflexive movement in someone who has lost most of their brain to indicate real sensation. You need a *lot* more complexity than even complex reflexes to consider anything capable of feeling (and flys have only a little more than a millionth of our complexity). Vertebrates would make a good first start, along with creatures with similar or higher complexity levels to the simple vertebrates, but the actual layout of the brain architecture probably also should be taken into account. Obviously if we actually knew about how to derive this knowledge form brain measurements a lot of ethical questions would be a lot simpler.

    15. Re:That's not funny by bura · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is very sick and gross, and very different from killing a cockroach. This is torture and playing with limbs of a living being.

    16. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually cockroaches, like many insects, don't have a centralized nervous system. It's part of the reason they are so hard to kill. They can live without their head for weeks before starving to death.

    17. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's actually not true at all. Pain is carried by nociceptors, which are found in higher orders. Insects have not been demonstrated to have nociceptors. They "feel" noxious stimuli. But they don't process noxious stimuli as "pain". They process it as a feeling, and something they want to get away from. But their nervous system doesn't process it as an "unpleasant" stimulus. Just a stimulus that might possibly kill them, so they should flee the stimulus.

    18. Re:That's not funny by codewarren · · Score: 1

      Your line is arbitrary and not well thought out. It is incorrect to assume that because both humans and cockroaches have brains and humans can suffer pain that cockroaches therefore can suffer pain in any comparable way. The difference between a human brain and a cockroach brain is clearly much more immense than you seem to notice.

      Brains vary considerably in complexity between the most simple clumps of neurons to the most complicated mess of emotions and cognition in humans. To assert that all of these are equally able to experience pain and suffering would obviously be ludicrous.

    19. Re:That's not funny by million_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a pretty weak defense against a claim of cruelty. A human analogue: Suppose you need a bunch of healthy teeth for an experiment. Find a child and yank out a few teeth - they'll grow new ones eventually. Shoot them up full of Novocaine first and they won't even feel it. I assume no one thinks that's acceptable?

      If you're ok with the process because it's only a cockroach, just admit that. Don't try to use some false justification to convince yourself that you were humane about cutting it's leg off.

    20. Re:That's not funny by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't be too surprised if, after you die, there's a roomful of oversized roaches waiting for you with jumper cables and a car battery.

    21. Re:That's not funny by codewarren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A human analog is irrelevant. Humans are not analogous to cockroaches in this way. Humans feel pain through nociceptors. Cockroaches don't have these.

      Besides that Humans can feel horror and misery that a brain as simple as a cockroaches almost certainly cannot. They do not have higher emotions and higher functions. They don't even have memory. Whatever it is like to be a cockroach, it is almost certainly nothing like what it is like to be a human.

    22. Re:That's not funny by codewarren · · Score: 2

      My point is that more is required to feel pain than "has neurons", or even "has a nervous system". A crucial part of the human experience of pain involves nociceptors which cockroaches do not have, for example. My point from the beginning is that revulsion from perceived cruelty in prodding cockroaches in this way is due to anthropomorphizing cockroaches and not any actual cruelty.

      Based on the modding, here, it looks like actual scientific data still takes a back seat to intuition.

    23. Re:That's not funny by Hentes · · Score: 1

      The two are not exclusive. Besides, cockroaches don't really have a central conscious brain or something, you can cut their head off and they will continue to live happily.

    24. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There'll be no next life, he'll cease to function and have his remains disposed of, that's all. Just like you and me (and that cockroach).

    25. Re:That's not funny by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever touched the terminals of a car battery? Quite the jolt I tell you.

      Not.

      Now, as for the pinching pain from the jump leads, yeah that would hurt like fuck. Car battery not required.

    26. Re:That's not funny by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      it's also OK to spray chemicals around to kill off the child infestation of your house too. Or to turn on the kitchen light and jump on the child before it runs under the fridge.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    27. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an excluded muddle there.

      It's possible to believe that "it's just a cockroach" or "we're taking steps to reduce the trauma" alone are not sufficient justification for the harm done to the subject but "It's just a cockroach, and we're taking steps to reduce the trauma to the subject" is.

    28. Re:That's not funny by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      The line is based on intent. If you are ripping cockroach legs off just to watch it suffer, or if you are punching holes in a tree just to watch it die then it's cruel. If you are doing honest research and experimentation then it may not be cruel. It still may not be the right thing to do though.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    29. Re:That's not funny by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whatever it is like to be a cockroach, it is almost certainly nothing like what it is like to be a human.

      Excuse me, but a Mr. Franz Kafka says he would like to have a word with you.

    30. Re:That's not funny by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      So you're okay with torturing something as long as your end goal is to kill it? Because all those things are closer to torture than what they did in this experiment.

    31. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, so with a bluetooth interface to your phone, a download, and a few electrodes, white folk can dance The Cucaracha??

      The perfect addition to text and speech translation software.

    32. Re:That's not funny by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cockroaches are not humans.

      By your argument a neural network running on my computer also feels "pain" and our collective computer systems are the worst set of torturers to have ever existed.

    33. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sticking an electrode into a creature and have it twitching to music is not funny, it's cruel.

      But is it less traumatic than teaching people to dance by dodging coat-hangers before they're born?

      But avoiding wires is a good thing, efficient like an electric butt-plug!
      Hmmm, with bluetooth, just might work as a phone too.
      Still gotta perfect that methane power thing.

    34. Re:That's not funny by Surt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So your claim is that cockroaches are as human as Jews?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    35. Re:That's not funny by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      So you're okay with torturing something as long as your end goal is to kill it? Because all those things are closer to torture than what they did in this experiment.

      No. I'm not OK with torturing anything for any reason. I don't consider swatting flies torture because it's a quick death.

    36. Re:That's not funny by AioKits · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you're okay with torturing something as long as your end goal is to kill it? Because all those things are closer to torture than what they did in this experiment.

      If I find a cockroach in the kitchen I make sure to set up my tiny crucifixion of him in the middle of the kitchen floor. Sure it may be months before he dies, but it serves as a warning to the rest of the bastards in hiding.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    37. Re:That's not funny by codewarren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By this logic, mowing one's lawn is a virtual holocaust of cruelty.

    38. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they are not children, they are cockroaches. They're designed to lose limbs, have a no real form of self awareness, and are a pest. They do not feel human emotions, they are not sad, they don't even know what is going on. In fact, they are a blight, a pest, and are exterminated all the time. Your claims of cruelty are anthromorphizing insect pests.

    39. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right, we've got to stop the cockroach genocide!

    40. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cockroach..
      As I look around the world at all the problems and horror, I see your post and think "so that is what happens when you roll a 1 while trying to pick your battles".

      Good luck on setting up your "No Kill" cockroach shelter, the people of Darfur salute you!

    41. Re:That's not funny by plover · · Score: 1

      I came here to post "won't somebody think of the cockroaches?", but apparently somebody is.

      --
      John
    42. Re:That's not funny by yanom · · Score: 1

      Find a child and yank out a few teeth - they'll grow new ones eventually. Shoot them up full of Novocaine first and they won't even feel it. I assume no one thinks that's acceptable?

      I'm actually O.K. with this.

      --
      "That's either incredibly asinine or the most brilliant troll I've ever read. Not sure which." -Anonymous Coward
    43. Re:That's not funny by plover · · Score: 1

      Read The Sound Machine by Roald Dahl sometime. Interesting exploration of this idea.

      --
      John
    44. Re:That's not funny by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Unless you don't quiet kill it with the hit and then it's injured barely living body falls into a nook as it slowly twitches to death. After it spend a grueling marathon of trying to escape the massive object trying to squash it.

    45. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some trees communication when attacked to give their 'friends' time to prepare a defence.
      I don't know if that is an indication of feeling pain or not, or even if nerves are necessary to feel pain. (The sensations could very well be transfered by different means in other species.)
      Just because the pain doesn't behave like it does in humans doesn't mean that it isn't pain.

      I guess it is more a matter defining what pain is rather than trying to measure it.

    46. Re:That's not funny by satuon · · Score: 1

      I actually was agreeing with you. That's why I said I doubt their pain has any meaning. To elaborate, if a computer has a thermal sensor that detects that its CPU is going to melt, and it tries to shutdown the system, does this count as pain? In the same way, perhaps an insects nervous system is so simple that it feeling pain is not much different than that.

    47. Re:That's not funny by wganz · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from spraying cockroaches with a dilute nerve agent?
      You are getting all choked up over a flipping cockroach yet are totally silent on how a human fetus is ripped to shreds.

    48. Re:That's not funny by zer0sig · · Score: 1

      Like many other children, I had this performed on a tooth or 2 to give adult teeth room to grow. I suppose it depends on the purpose of the extractions.

    49. Re:That's not funny by zer0sig · · Score: 1

      I sense injury. The data could be called pain.

    50. Re:That's not funny by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I already do this to gather teeth to get rich off of the tooth fairy. We tell the little bastards that the we're removing isn't a tooth, but bone cancer from the jaw we need to remove pronto.

    51. Re:That's not funny by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Noted, Gary Larson.

    52. Re:That's not funny by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      Two words: prove it.

      You are merely making assumptions about these things, but really have no actual idea. If you state outright that these are truths, I would like you to prove it.

    53. Re:That's not funny by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      So when you mow your lawn you get satisfaction that every blade of grass suffered as it was cut? Me it's just so it is well kept and looks nice. The intent is not cruelty. Even a dog knows the difference between getting step on and kicked.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    54. Re:That's not funny by scubamage · · Score: 2

      They still display nociception (writhing on a pin when stabbed for example), and they have receptors for endogenous opioids. This suggests that they still have some sort of elementary reception of noxious stimuli, and their bodies release chemicals to dull sensations of pain. While no, its most likely not the sensation humans are used to, it is still a negative sensation that should be minimized.

    55. Re:That's not funny by scubamage · · Score: 1

      and are a pest.

      And I stopped reading here. Calling something a "pest" is an opinion. While they may annoy you, cockroaches fill a biological niches, just like anything else that annoys you (from virii to noxious bacteria to your mother-in-law). They have a purpose, whether or not you choose to recognize it. Calling something a pest is akin to saying "I like purple!" It is devoid of actual meaning or constructive argument. Please reconstruct your argument and try again.

    56. Re:That's not funny by scubamage · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with it so long as you put a dollar under their pillow. Then it's A-OK.

    57. Re:That's not funny by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't. Killing an insect is usually avoiding the fact that there is a larger problem. See a pile of ants? Pick up the garbage or spilled food. Tons of flies? Clean your dishes. Have a mouse tearing into your grains? Put them in a metal container. In my experience most 'pest problems' are human problems that animals take advantage of to do things like... you know... eat, and breed. How dare they.

    58. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's a difference between holding a 9-volt battery in a dry hand and licking it.

      Here's a hint for you. Try licking your fingers, and then grabbing both terminals of your car battery.
      Or if you want to avoid the whole 'there's a crapton of reasons why a good electrical current won't run from the terminal, through dry or mildly moist skin, through to the rest of me below said skin', try grabbing a wrench nice and firmly, and laying that wrench across both terminals. Let me know how that works out for you.

    59. Re:That's not funny by hexagonc · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that there is an appropriate human analogue for this. For one thing, it is debatable whether your example of taking a tooth of a child under anesthesia is cruel. Unethical because you've violated human principles of self-determination and control of one's own body but probably not cruel. However, doing the operation to a human without anesthesia would be cruel. Whether something is cruel or not depends on the ability of the subject to feel pain; this is part of the definition of "cruel".

      I think your problem is that you think the harm that is done to the insect is greater than the educational benefit to the experimenter. The degree to which means can justify ends has been debated by philosophers for centuries.

    60. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a spectrum of cruelty based on the capacity to suffer.

      Plants don't even have nervous systems, hence do not feel pain (yes, I am aware of the nonsense about plants feeling pain because they display chemical responses to injury....but....that is obviously not the same thing so I won't belabor the point).

      The more advanced the nervous system, the greater the varieties and depth of suffering, and hence the greater the level of cruelty.

      For a plant, the cruelty level is zero. For a roach, it is low but non-zero. For a human, it is pretty high.

    61. Re:That's not funny by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever watched TRON? It's a fucking nightmare in there!

    62. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640K of memory ought to be enough for even the most prodigious cockroach

    63. Re:That's not funny by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Besides that Humans can feel horror and misery that a brain as simple as a cockroaches almost certainly cannot.

      What makes you so certain? If you were in a cockroach body you would have limited senses and physical abilities, so even if you feel horror and misery how would you prove it to some human? Cockroaches may not pass IQ tests, but how can you be so sure they don't feel pain, horror and misery? And how much can you learn with a limited cockroach body? They certainly do have memory: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070927132543.htm

      Maybe amoebas too: http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artsep01/feed.html
      Some amoebas even build elaborate shells:
      http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artsep01/shelled.html
      Instinct maybe, but what's instinct then? And how sure are you that horror and misery don't come with instinct either? After all pain, horror and misery would be more useful concepts than passing IQ tests to most creatures on this planet and elsewhere even.

      I think we're are still far from understanding thought and consciousness.

      By the way there are single neurons that specialize in going "BINGO!" whenever someone thinks "Halle Berry".
      http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Single-Cell-Recognition-Research-6260.aspx

      Who knows, an individual amoeba might be potentially more intelligent than a single neuron. But there is currently no way for an amoeba to be hooked up to a suitable body to prove otherwise, no super exoskeleton or mecha robot equivalent that it can pilot and be provide supersenses. In contrast, multi-cellular animals allow a bunch of neurons to pilot a body and have their senses extended. But the neurons still have to specialize and cooperate with other neurons to fire the impulses to move limbs, receive impulses etc. A single cell wouldn't be able to do it plus there is no redundancy - if the entire body is controlled by a single cell and that cell dies without a replacement, the body is in trouble.

      --
    64. Re:That's not funny by tom17 · · Score: 2

      I have plenty of experience of 9v batteries on the tongue (one of the most sensitive organs on the body? I dunno). Used to do it for fun as a kid. I like the tingle :)

      I also have plenty of experience of touching 12v batteries when wet. Nada. Maybe I have a higher resistance than you?

      I also have plenty of experience of flashing a battery. Fortunately I do not have a resistance approaching 0 Ohms so it doesn't really have the same effect on my wet hands when I touch the terminals. If you are implying that I should hold onto the spanner while shorting it, sure I could, but I won't because I don't want to get burned as it heats up. Other things that I do not hold onto include 6v soldering irons, 3v hot-wire cutter wire etc.

      Sure, a car battery has a lot of current delivering ability, but with only 12v pushing it, it's not going to get very far on high resistance loads, such as me connected to it with oversized crocodile clips :)

    65. Re:That's not funny by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The last I checked amoebas certainly don't have neurons. Where's your proof that they don't feel anything? They sure seem to react to the environment and it's not just dumb reflexes. http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artsep01/feed.html
      Some even build shells!

      I suspect the main difference between single celled creatures and us is the single celled creatures haven't managed to scale to our size and thus get our abilities.

      If you pilot an amoeba, you're not going to do that much fancy stuff even if you're a hotshot. Whereas a large committee/organization of neurons controlling a body can do more fancy stuff.

      --
    66. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? Really?
      Funny, ok, but informative?

      Do a bunch of crack addled PETA members here on /. think that Metamorphosis was an autobiography?

    67. Re:That's not funny by skids · · Score: 1

      There'll be no next life, he'll cease to function and have his remains disposed of, that's all. Just like you and me (and that cockroach).

      What a relief. It is sure refreshing to know that there are superior intellects in the world who have already completely characterized consciousness, not to mention time and space, to the point of being able to make such statements with such a degree of confidence. I was afraid I might actually have to bother to read some of those boring philosophy books, but since you've got this problem all sewn up, I guess I won't have to bother.

    68. Re:That's not funny by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      And there's a difference between holding a 9-volt battery in a dry hand and licking it.

      Here's a hint for you. Try licking your fingers, and then grabbing both terminals of your car battery. Or if you want to avoid the whole 'there's a crapton of reasons why a good electrical current won't run from the terminal, through dry or mildly moist skin, through to the rest of me below said skin', try grabbing a wrench nice and firmly, and laying that wrench across both terminals. Let me know how that works out for you.

      I'm guessing you've never actually tried that. Here's a hint, it's not the low-quality connection between your skin and the battery that protectsus , it's the 1000Ohms of reistance IN your skin (which your tongue does not have) that protects us. That make a car battey put out 12mA, which would be conducted through the subdermal if anything and you still wouldn't feel it.

      Now, CUT both hands and touch the bloody parts to the battery, and that's a whole other story!

    69. Re:That's not funny by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      No, it's not all that bad. It's not country music.

    70. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By any logic, you seem retarded.

    71. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugs are not conscious and therefore cannot experience pain or pleasure.

    72. Re:That's not funny by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is like to be a cockroach, it is almost certainly nothing like what it is like to be a human.

      What you mean hiding in secluded dark places waiting patiently for the moment of total world domination? The only difference between us and the cockroaches is we have computers.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    73. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't really see the issue with this even using the human analogy. I think in that case you would be asking for permissions and waivers and getting medical professionals involved, or even harvesting teeth from newly dead or from people with a few good teeth that are yanked for total dentures. The point is, humans are more important than roaches. Are you against swatting a fly on your food? You could damage its wing and prevent it from finding a mate, not to mention be depriving of a food source and be responsible for the starvation of an inocent creature.

    74. Re:That's not funny by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      That said, Acacia trees have a reflex action when their leaves are eaten. Their leaves release Hydrogen Cyanide when something tries to eat them. The HCN then causes all of the nearby leaves to release HCN in a chain reaction. It may be just a 'dumb reaction' but who is to say that they don't feel their leaves being eaten?

    75. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sticking an electrode into a creature and have it twitching to music is not funny, it's cruel.

      I did wonder whether anyone would say this.

      I'm fairly sure that if people were selling home vivisection kits for puppies there would be a bit more of an uproar.

      I know they're only cockroaches, the point is the mentality of the people who think this is fun. It's like kids pulling the wings off flies or the legs off spiders: the worry is that this is the beginning of a well trodden path leading to psycopathic behaviour in adults.There is a sort of unholy triumvirate of animal cruelty, firestarting and (late) bedwetting that are not good signs in a child.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    76. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That's quite a lot of "almost certainlys". The fact is that you are guessing.

      A lot of people would argue that no animals have "higher emotions" and that, for example, if you torture a kitten to deathh it's just displaying purely physical reactions, and has no concept of being tortured or of its impending doom. Even if that's true, it doesn't make it right. And it certainly doesn't make it right when it's just a toy for geeks.

      It is the motivation of the humans causing unnecessary suffering that is the real problem. Think about the scene in Blade Runner where they ask Leon about the upside down turtle in the desert. It's a test of humanity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    77. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There'll be no next life, he'll cease to function and have his remains disposed of, that's all. Just like you and me (and that cockroach).

      What a relief. It is sure refreshing to know that there are superior intellects in the world who have already completely characterized consciousness, not to mention time and space, to the point of being able to make such statements with such a degree of confidence. I was afraid I might actually have to bother to read some of those boring philosophy books, but since you've got this problem all sewn up, I guess I won't have to bother.

      GP's position is quite reasonable unless you can prove otherwise. As with the existence of God, it is up to believers to prove/show it.

      Obviously, it would be earthshaking news if you could show that consciousness somehow lives on after death, just as I would be if someone could actually prove that God exists.

      I'm waiting...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    78. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      So your claim is that cockroaches are as human as Jews?

      I think you need to go on a basic logic and reading comprehension course..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    79. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't want anyone who thinks it's funny to make disembodied insects' legs twitch anywhere near my kids

      Intuitive and un-scientific?

      Hint: I don't give a fuck about the cockroaches..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    80. Re:That's not funny by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should talk to someone professionally trained about this.

    81. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you can't see the difference between unavoidable suffering caused in the name of scientific research, and torturing animals for fun, there's something wrong with you.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    82. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm sure once the giant cockroaches worked out that the battery wasn't hurting you they'd just start snipping off your bits and pieces with their monstrous jaws anyway, so I wouldn't get too cocky.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    83. Re:That's not funny by aiht · · Score: 1

      and are a pest.

      And I stopped reading here. Calling something a "pest" is an opinion. While they may annoy you, cockroaches fill a biological niches, just like anything else that annoys you (from virii to noxious bacteria to your mother-in-law). They have a purpose, whether or not you choose to recognize it. Calling something a pest is akin to saying "I like purple!" It is devoid of actual meaning or constructive argument. Please reconstruct your argument and try again.

      I read that as shorthand for "and are a type of animal that we deliberately slaughter en masse because they annoy us and get in our way, and most people are fine with that, to the extent that there is a respected and legal profession specialising in that exact activity."
      The word "pest" can be used casually to mean "something I don't like", but it also means a member of a broad and ill-defined class of animals and plants, e.g. "A pest is an animal which is detrimental to humans".
      GP was using it in that sense, which definitely includes cockroaches, and your objections are beside the point.

    84. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You are getting all choked up over a flipping cockroach yet are totally silent on how a human fetus is ripped to shreds.

      A human fetus is not an autonomous being. You might as well cry about the sperm wasted when you jack off over pictures of Sarah Palin.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    85. Re:That's not funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Bugs are not conscious and therefore cannot experience pain or pleasure.

      Same as Anonymous Cowards then?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    86. Re:That's not funny by skids · · Score: 1

      GP's position is quite reasonable unless you can prove otherwise

      Neither the assertion that consciousness is discontiguous nor discontiguous is reasonable, given the answer to that question is unknown. Neither are assertions as to the knowability of the answer to that question, since the knowablity is currently unknown as well.

      Anyone, theist or atheist, who makes such assertions is being intellectually dishonest.

      (None of this has anything to do with "God" except for panentheistic/clockmaker definitions of the term.)

    87. Re:That's not funny by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'd be more convinced if you could make an argument to that effect, instead of just a claim.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    88. Re:That's not funny by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Now that I have never tried. Does it hurt?

    89. Re:That's not funny by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      A human analogue: [SNIP details] Shoot them up full of Novocaine first and they won't even feel it. I assume no one thinks that's acceptable?

      Why would you assume that?

      I think that your experimental protocol is no less unacceptable than the one described using cats, dogs, rats, cockroaches, etc as analogues for human beings.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. I wonder by Sparticus789 · · Score: 2

    Didn't Dexter get started with stuff like this? In 20 years there will be some kid suing /. because he read this article and turned into a serial killer.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  4. Cockroaches by scubamage · · Score: 5, Informative

    At first the animal lover in me was wondering about the ethics of randomly cutting apart cockroaches without any clear scientific benefit outside of learning (at least dissections tend to teach more than one person - disclaimer, I was on a human subject review board for scientific studies at my college). However it looks like they go out of their way to actually keep everything humane. And, its also important to note that the cockroaches are anesthetized, and their legs do in fact grow back. They get a thumbs up!

    1. Re:Cockroaches by durrr · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure that insects are not covered by any animal cruelty laws and regulations, building a cockroach-sized medieval torture chamber is as such entirely legal although perhaps somewhat eccentric.

    2. Re:Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U men i can haz Wasp Factory?

    3. Re:Cockroaches by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      Since insects don't feel pain, I think the anesthesia is more about the convenience of having the bug hold still while its leg is amputated. And maybe to make people feel better. Judging by your response, It worked.

    4. Re:Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, it's also a reason why Stone Crabs Claws are a more "friendly and sustainable" catch for seafood. It's not perfect but the animal has a good chance of surviving even after being harvested. The crabs are caught, the claws are removed (which they will grow back) and then they are released. "Good" crabbers will only take the largest claw because the mortality rates are 47% for double amputation but only 28% for single amputation although it is legal to take both claws.

    5. Re:Cockroaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they would have to have nerves to feel pain. Oh, wait...

    6. Re:Cockroaches by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Actually, we're unsure whether or not insects feel pain. Many possess opioid/opiate receptors, which would suggest that their body may produce opioids/opiates to nullify pain. In which case, they may in fact feel pain, or else they'd have no reason to have those receptors. Given that, the safer assumption is to assume they do.

    7. Re:Cockroaches by zer0sig · · Score: 1

      Not in NC, it's not. Federally, maybe.

    8. Re:Cockroaches by scubamage · · Score: 1

      And yet they have the same nociception that higher order animals have. And they have receptors for endogeneous opioids. So, they act like they feel pain, and they have receptors for chemicals whose sole purpose is to dull pain.

    9. Re:Cockroaches by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      Sorry, no. The recent discovery of endogenous opioid peptides and their receptor sites in various invertebrates (including insects) may encourage the belief that these animals can experience pain in view of the analgesic role of opioid peptides in mammals. However, the various functions, unrelated to pain experience, which are mediated by opioids in mammals, as well as the known occurrence of two such compounds in a protozoan, suggest that the endogenous opioids of invertebrates may function in regulating physiological or behavioral activities unconnected with pain phenomena. The presence of opioids can therefore not be taken as necessarily indicating a capacity for pain perception in an animal. http://www.ganima.info/docs/pain/65.pdf

      The best indicator is behavior, and insects do not behave differently when injured, aside from any physical limitations the injury may cause. Personally I think it's unethical to cut off insect limbs for entertainment whether or not it causes pain; I just think the "anesthesia" angle is bunk and used in a weak attempt to circumvent any ethical criticism.

    10. Re:Cockroaches by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      FWIW, it's also a reason why Stone Crabs Claws are a more "friendly and sustainable" catch for seafood. It's not perfect but the animal has a good chance of surviving even after being harvested. The crabs are caught, the claws are removed (which they will grow back) and then they are released. "mathematically challenged" crabbers will only take the largest claw because the mortality rates are 47% for double amputation but only 28% for single amputation although it is legal to take both claws.

      FTFY. If you need 100 claws, you can either take both claws of 50 crabs (50 X 47% = 23.5 dead crabs) or half the claws of 100 crabs (100 X 28% = 28 dead crabs).

    11. Re:Cockroaches by aiht · · Score: 1

      U men i can haz Wasp Factory?

      Get back in your attic, Frank.

    12. Re:Cockroaches by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that insects are not covered by any animal cruelty laws and regulations, building a cockroach-sized medieval torture chamber is as such entirely legal although perhaps somewhat eccentric.

      You misspelled psychotic.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Cockroaches by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And yet they have the same nociception that higher order animals have. And they have receptors for endogeneous opioids. So, they act like they feel pain, and they have receptors for chemicals whose sole purpose is to dull pain.

      Yeah, but find me the written or oral testimony of a cockroach confirming it feels pain. Ha! I thought not.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by alphatel · · Score: 1

    Current science is wrong.

    Unbelievable.

    If current science = wrong
    and unproven thought = believable
    therefor non-science = truth!

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  6. Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do i block these kind of stories in adblock?

    1. Re:Adblock by plover · · Score: 1

      How do i block these kind of stories in adblock?

      Create an adblock filter for http://science.slashdot.org./ But if you really intended to block this, you already knew this answer.

      A different way would be to create a slashdot account, then go into options, and on the exclusions tab select the Science category. Click save. You won't see them, yet you can get to them when you want. Or maybe you just want to exclude stories from roblimo. Check his box, too.

      But much better would be to use your brain. If you don't think a story is interesting, STOP READING IT. Nobody made you come in to this discussion and post about it.

      --
      John
  7. Where are all the tree huggers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a quick search and I can't find any of the usual groups complaining about this. Apparently they are all fine with pulling legs off cockroaches and zapping them, damn hippocrits. I bet if I did the same to the neighbor's cat I could make its leg twitch too....

    1. Re:Where are all the tree huggers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, this is nothing, some guys half a century ago just used whatever minorities they had at hand.

      That's right, I went there and it was god damn slow for a Godwin.

  8. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know it has yet to be tested, but it works.

    The evidence is strong with this one!

  9. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by durrr · · Score: 1

    Unbelievable, because he's wrong.

  10. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did you know that nerds have such large deficiencies in their brains that you can post Slashdot articles almost at random so you can stimulate that advertising revenue with advertisements disguised as badly edited articles and watch them squirm? And that you can easily order the editors to do this at home or at work? You can. And supplies to perform many other psychology experiments, too. Amaze your investors! Learn how marketing works! Alienate your readers! All that (and more) is what Slashvertisement is about.

    1. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alienate your readers! All that (and more) is what Slashvertisement is about.

      god forbid they pay the bills!

  11. We've seen this before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imperio!

  12. WUBWUBWUBWUB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just you wait, someone will use this to film and upload a dubstep roach video.

  13. A face fit for radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is really cool, but OMG these guys should never be on video doing a sales pitch! There are hot nerd girls in the world who would be 1000 times better at doing this. Yes, the science is cool, but the marketing sucks.

  14. oh jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    you're not actually going to tell me that the two highest rated posts right now are two morons wringing their hands about cruelty to cockroaches

    if we're going to talk about proportionality, scale, and context in your "morality", do your brains undergo nuclear fission when viewing the youtube video of the kids massacred in houla?

    now, of course, a reply to my post will be a lecture about how horrible homo sapiens is, so little kids deserve to be massacred, it doesn't matter, but cockroaches are beautiful creatures full of love and feeling

    fuck it, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em:

    can we repeat this experiment with the leg of a PETA member?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:oh jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      can we repeat this experiment with the leg of a PETA member?

      No, unlike roaches, PETA members lack the functional nervous system required for this to work.

    2. Re:oh jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Also unlike roaches, PETA members do not regrow lost legs. However I do not view this as a problem and in fact this serves as a useful inhibitor to help keep them from showing up places.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:oh jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick by tom17 · · Score: 1

      You want a real sense of proportion and context? Here, sit in this room...

      *Gets out the fairy cake*

    4. Re:oh jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It is a point worth repeating that issues involving unnecessary cruelty to animals are worrying because of the state of mind of the humans involved.

      I'm not worried about the fly who gets its wings pulled off by a child, I'm worried about the child.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  15. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to back that up? From what I read the process works. In fact, he's the first to ever provide a solid framework for neural processing.

  16. Timmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure those electrodes will work just the same on little timmy as well.

  17. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turned off adBlock and only saw two adds on this page. The part that's sad is they are more interesting then the submission :/

  18. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

    I know it has yet to be tested, but it works.

    Congradulations, you've won our dictionary definition word of the day!

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  19. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by durrr · · Score: 1

    Why should I when he don't? His rantings are also peppered with factual inaccuracies, but someone ignorant would of course not know that.

  20. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever.

  21. Submission Tip #23: by Saroful · · Score: 2

    Put at least SOME effort into making the submission not appear to be an advertisement (even if it is one).

  22. Fundamental Disconnect by lerxstz · · Score: 1

    This is why the human species is ultimately doomed. There is a basic disconnect at some basic level for too many people such that there is no respect for life. Sure, I understand the research and educational aspect, blah blah blah. Fine. Yes it's "only" a cockroach. Fine. Yes there are bigger atrocities everyday. Fine. I'm not saying we should never use a cockroach for research. But to see recreational "fun" in the discomfort of another creature (however small) shows that homo sapiens are mentally deficient. Yes, learning is necessary, research is required, but there should be no amusement aspect in it if we're wired correctly. Ultimately, and we already do, we shit on our own life support system. If we don't understand this, and it's apparent that by and large we don't as a species, we're ultimately doomed because we don't respect the systems that allow us to continue. If there's no respect, we will not do what is necessary to sustain those systems.

    No I will not waste time debating this.

    --
    I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
    1. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Go live in a cave and eat sand then.

      Just about any other human endeavour has been built on the exploitation of other living creatures. The big differentiator is doing it humanely.

    2. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by wolfsdaughter · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod you up.

      --
      "Are they made from real Girl Scouts?" ~Wednesday Addams
    3. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'we shit on our own life support system'? is that a thinly veiled comment on climate change? my what a socially conscious new age citizen you are! I'm going to bring my child, cooper, over to your house to sample some of your organic rain forest alliance certified zuchinni muffin.

    4. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by cjcela · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Thank you. I cannot believe some some of the people on this thread. Doing mindless "experiments" with anything living is fundamentally wrong - there is nothing a common person will gain from purchasing that product and using it for electrocuting insects. This is not different than a 5 year old stabbing a dog to see what happens.

    5. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by cjcela · · Score: 1

      It is not just that, you need a clear purpose too. If you just do this kind of things as a hobby interest, you are doing harm for free. Nothing is gained. Respectfully, I think that you saying "go live in a cave and eat sand" is an extreme reaction to the parent's post. He has a good point.

    6. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assertion that there is no difference between dogs and cockroaches in an insult to dogs and dog owners everywhere. Are you even reading what you're typing?

    7. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by cjcela · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read what I type. And no, it is not an insult. I love dogs. Do not be so angry and self-entitled to speak for all dog owners, because you are certainly not speaking for me. The commonality is that cockroaches and dogs are both alive. And that in both cases, there is nothing for the person to win in doing these things.

    8. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by plover · · Score: 1

      There's a quantitative and qualitative difference between roaches and mammals. Roaches are disease carrying pests that indiscriminately destroy resources needed by higher species to survive. There are billions of roaches, with billions more waiting to hatch every day, making eradication impossible. I suspect most roaches die due to competition with other roaches for the limited food they have available. Next, there's always a lifespan issue: everything living dies eventually. Even if you wanted to keep a particular roach alive for five years as a pet, it's not going to make it. So if, in its inevitable death, the cockroach can inspire or teach someone, rather than die under a boot heel, or from a chemical fog, or from another predator, or starvation, or a disease, or of dehydration after being stuck on a glue trap, is that not somehow a "better" death in that it serves a higher purpose?

      I personally don't think too highly of plucking the legs off a bug to make them dance for my own amusement, and certainly won't be doing so myself. But I also view cockroaches realistically as harmful pests that ruin (not enhance) ecosystems. I won't be losing any sleep over the deaths of a few extra roaches, no matter how they die.

      --
      John
    9. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not just that, you need a clear purpose too. If you just do this kind of things as a hobby interest, you are doing harm for free. Nothing is gained. Respectfully, I think that you saying "go live in a cave and eat sand" is an extreme reaction to the parent's post. He has a good point.

      I hope you don't use recreational vehicles as a "hobby". Think of the harm you are doing.

    10. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of what you wrote could be said of humans as well:

      Humans are disease carrying pests that indiscriminately destroy resources needed to survive. There are billions of humans, with millions more waiting to hatch every day, making eradication impossible. I suspect most humans die due to competition with other humans for the limited food they have available. Next, there's always a lifespan issue: everything living dies eventually. So if, in its inevitable death, the human can inspire or teach someone, rather than die under a boot heel, or from a chemical fog, or from another predator, or starvation, or a disease, or of dehydration, is that not somehow a "better" death in that it serves a higher purpose?

      I personally don't think too highly of plucking the legs off a human to make them dance for my own amusement, and certainly won't be doing so myself.

      I thought it was quite clever until I noticed you weren't trying to be funny.

      But I also view cockroaches realistically as harmful pests that ruin (not enhance) ecosystems.

      I'm no biologist, but roaches probably help the ecosystem's stability. That's not to say you should let them roam free in your kitchen, but completely eliminating them could cause problems in the long run.

    11. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by plover · · Score: 1

      So I'm a species bigot. Guess what? That's the advantage of being at the top, and owning the classification system. Until another superior life form comes around and classifies us as vermin, we aren't.

      That's not to say we don't have responsibilities to other species. Of course we do. Right now, the responsibility to other species regarding roaches should be "human activity brought non-native roaches across the oceans to become invasive species where they don't belong, so our responsibility is to the native species that are harmed by the roaches. That means we should make every attempt to eradicate roaches."

      However, if you really think that humans and roaches should have equal rights, be aware that your only real opportunity is to go join with the roaches, and hope the rest of us don't choke you in a cloud of pesticides. Or you could quit trying to defend really stupid arguments on the interwebz and go volunteer in the community instead, and make a difference to actual suffering humans who need your help.

      --
      John
    12. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Cats will do this too though. I've seen cats bat around bugs for hours, chasing them for fun. Why is it worse when we do it?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Go live in a cave and eat sand then.

      Just about any other human endeavour has been built on the exploitation of other living creatures. The big differentiator is doing it humanely.

      You didn't read what he said properly::

      "But to see recreational "fun" in the discomfort of another creature (however small) shows that homo sapiens are mentally deficient."

      The point is that people are inflicting pain/discomfort on the cockroaches for fun This is by inhumane because it debases the humans doing it. They're not eating them or doing serious scientific research.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You are entirely missing the point. No one cares about cockroaches per se, what's disturbing is the psycopathology of the humans inflicting pain on them for their own amusement.

      It's like a kid who burns a house down for th lulz. I'm not worried about the house.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Cats will do this too though. I've seen cats bat around bugs for hours, chasing them for fun. Why is it worse when we do it?

      Because we have a choice, genius.

      You shouldn't really need to be told that.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Fundamental Disconnect by plover · · Score: 1

      Very good point that I completely missed, thank you.

      --
      John
  23. So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shameless articles about torturing animals (even insects are beneath this) and astroturfing posts cheering them on. Wag of the finger, site I used to love...

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by codewarren · · Score: 2

      The difference between a cockroach nervous system and a human nervous system, especially with regards to pain pathways, is immense. Your intuition is just wrong. Cockroaches can't suffer like humans can because they have no higher order functions. They don't think, they don't remember, they don't have desires, or higher emotions because they lack the circuitry for it.

      It is an insult to human torture victims to compare a cockroach's experience to that of a human's. You've inflicted more torture on this world by forcing us to read your drivel than any human has by poking a disembodied cockroach leg.

    2. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by gatesstillborg · · Score: 1

      i'm guessing corporo-dot is taking a cut of each brain-zapper sold.

    3. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      Asshat. This isn't for medical science or anything as noble - it's "hey look what happens when we do this" and fundamentally no different to shooting things for fun. It's irrelevant that the roaches "feel no pain" - it's unethical, full stop.

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    4. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in a world where people are routinely and legally hired to kill not only cockroaches but mice and rats by the hundreds, and you want to tell people that they can't do this experiment? Besides, it doesn't need to have the explicit goal of curing orphans of cancer in order to be justified. Cockroaches really just don't feel pain in any way that you or I understand the word.

    5. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by codewarren · · Score: 1

      If one shoots a tree, is that also unethical, full stop? No, because what matters is what it is like to be the one being experimented on. Since trees don't care if you shoot them, shooting them is not unethical. Cockroaches lack the circuitry require to "care", this wouldn't be torture any more than making computers do what we want would be slave labor. Incidentally they also lack the pain pathways humans have.

      You could just think this through instead of assuming that everyone who doesn't conform to your intuitions is an asshat.

    6. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Asshat. This isn't for medical science or anything as noble - it's "hey look what happens when we do this" and fundamentally no different to shooting things for fun. It's irrelevant that the roaches "feel no pain" - it's unethical, full stop.

      What the hell? There is a single reason why it's unethical to do that to a human. They feel pain, both physical and mental anguish. If we did not, it would not be unethical to do it to humans. The cockroach does not, so it is not unethical to do it with them.

      By all means, lock them up in a glass jar and check out how long they can go without food. Cut out legs. Poke it. Who the fuck cares? It certainly doesn't, why should you?

    7. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a pretty narrow worldview, codewarren. And seem to assume a lot of things you have not the slightest idea about. Where do you get your 'facts'? An old encyclopaedia? Go back to your mom's basement and come back when you are a grown up.

    8. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you have a good point IF you where correct in your assumptions. But we do not know the answer to most of these questions you are being so categorical about. Whatever you believe does not makes things so.

    9. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It is an insult to human torture victims to compare a cockroach's experience to that of a human's.

      Nobody is. But I bet the mind of the torturer is similarly disturbed in both cases.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If one shoots a tree, is that also unethical, full stop? No, because what matters is what it is like to be the one being experimented on.

      No, what matters is what it is like to be the one doing the "experimenting".

      There would be something wrong with someone who shot and killed trees for the fun of watching them die. This does not mean there is anything wrong with cutting down trees for timber, or because they are dangerous in some way..

      If you can't see the difference, you are some sort of psychopath.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:So, how's monetizing Slashdot working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOOOOO STOP ENJOYING THINGS!!!!

      ftfy.

      Adding text to get past the yelling filter.

  24. Transcript by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

    Title: Backyard Brains Makes Educational (and Fun) Bioengineering Lab Kits
    Description: Their motto is "Neuroscience for Everyone," and they mean it!

    00:00) TITLE
    A shot of Rob Rozeboom sitting at a small table appears with the SlasdotTV logo bar reading "Slashdot Editor Rob Rozeboom".

    00:00) Rob
    If you're a fan of Frankenstein but have worries about villagers chasing you with pitchforks and torches, the folks at Backyard Brains have science kits for you.

    00:08) TITLE
    The SlashdotTV title sequence appears with the title Backyard Brains and two small photos of electronics mounted to insects.

    00:12) TITLE
    A view of a guy at a group desk with various computer screens and tools appears.

    00:12) Guy
    To all those out there on the interwebs listening to me and thinking "When is this guy gonna show us the inventions already?",

    00:17) TITLE
    The SlashdotTV logo bar fades in and out of view identifying this guy as "Backyard Brains Co-Founder Timothy Marzullo".

    00:17) Timothy
    The reason I can talk fast and hopefully talk about interesting things or boring things is because I have neurons.
    Neurons are electrochemical devices - cells - and it's hard to monitor the chemical secretions - the neurotransmitters - because they happen in very small spaces, you need powerful microscopes and fluorescently tagged molecules, but the electricity that a neuron generates is easy to... well, easier to monitor due to this magical invention which is allowing all the listeners to watch me and it's called the transistor.
    We all know due to the magic of the PN- and NP-junctions and creative uses of capacitors and resistors, we can make amplifiers and even computers.

    00:58) Timothy
    So what we have here are cockroaches and these are [...]

    01:03) TITLE
    The view zooms in on the box of cockroaches

    01:03) Timothy
    [...] muy especial cockroaches
    - viven en el bosque de Sudamerica - they live in the rain forests of South America.
    One of the reasons cockroaches are so fast is they have very large neurons in their legs. [...]

    01:16) TITLE
    The view zooms back out

    01:16) Timothy
    [...] These very large neurons are quite easy to record from.
    Now, we want to treat the cockroaches in a humane fashion, so we need to anesthetize them and so, uhm.. did you bring your halothane with you, in addition to your camera?

    01:31) Rob
    No..

    01:32) Timothy
    The propathol?

    01:33) Rob
    No... I

    01:34) Timothy
    The pentobarbital?

    01:35) Rob
    I might have a fifth of Jack in the car, but..

    01:38) Timothy
    Yeah, yeah.. so we could actually use that for the earthworms, but for the cockroaches we're just gonna use.. this is relatively old technology that probably doesn't excite the people at Slashdot that much, but when water goes below a certain temperature it undergoes a phase change in terms from a liquid to a solid, and so what we have here is ice, in water, and so we're gonna put the cockroaches in the ice water [...]

    02:03) TITLE
    The view zooms in on the cup of ice water

    02:03) Timothy
    [...] and after a minute or two that will chill them out and anesthetize them.

    02:06) Timothy
    I'm actually allergic to cockroaches because I've been working on them for about two years.
    I used to work in a rat lab, then I got allergic to rats, so I moved to cockroaches, now I'm allergic to cockroaches, so I'll have to move to.. maybe jellyfish and sea anemones next.
    It's a constantly.. I'm constantly fighting this battle between creatures.

    02:25) TITLE
    Timothy grabs a cockroach and puts it into the ice water.

    02:25) Timothy
    So these are.. they live in the rotting trees of the Amazonian rain forest, and I'm jut gonna dunk 'm into the ice water.
    And because these are cold-blooded, he can't mod.. regulate his own body core temperature and after a minute or two, he'll slowly.. he'll begin to move slower and slower and then we can do our exp

  25. Hip Hop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forcing cockroaches -- even if it's just their legs -- to listen to Hip Hop "music" is cruel and inhumane.

  26. That is not "cool" by cjcela · · Score: 0

    If you want to know how neurons work, hit the library, or better, take a class at your local college. Torturing living things just because you can is cruel, mindless, and will not likely give you any serious insight.

    1. Re:That is not "cool" by codewarren · · Score: 1

      It's ironic that if you, yourself, understood how neurons worked, you would realize that you can't torture something that doesn't have the capacity to feel tortured. You have underestimated the difference between cockroaches and humans. Perhaps more time at the library or your local college could help.

    2. Re:That is not "cool" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you want to know how neurons work, hit the library, or better, take a class at your local college. Torturing living things just because you can is cruel, mindless, and will not likely give you any serious insight.

      What it will do though is help develop your psychopathy nicely.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:That is not "cool" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You have underestimated the difference between cockroaches and humans.

      No, the difference is obvious. Cockroaches don't torture other creatures for fun, they just don't have the higher mental capacity required.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  27. This is monstrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure people will learn from these experiments. It won't be what you intend to teach.

  28. Extra brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. Our one foray into amateur neuroscience has been enough trouble. We've got an honest to goodness human brain sitting in a jar in our living room. I'm not sure why we agreed to take the thing. Took it from a relative who inherited it from her grandfather and dropped it off one day after we said "Hey, you've got a brain? That's cool!" Now we can't get rid of it. It's like some creepy fruitcake, but less festive.

    Yeah, I'm posting anonymously. We don't want to attract zombies.

  29. Forcingc hip hop music on anything is just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  30. Are you serious, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, some people here see a cockroach in the context of an experiment and turn their brains off, it seems, when they wouldn't bat an eye about pest control.

    Cockroaches don't even have the equipment to feel pain. Your anthropomorphization of all living things is just flat wrong.

  31. Common Objections to this work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am the co-founder of Backyard Brains and the person in the video. I address two criticisms below:
    1) Slashdot contacted me as we are a startup working out of the Ann Arbor Hackerspace, we develop educational hardware, and Slashdot, being based in Michigan, wants to highlight the local hacker and startup community. We are not paying Slashdot for this coverage.
    2) Since we do many neuroscience experiments in schools and in the public sphere, and are occasionally covered in the media, we often cause debate on animal experimentation. For an extensive discussion on common criticisms, see:
    http://wiki.backyardbrains.com/Ethical_Issues_Regarding_Using_Invertebrates_in_Education

    An except is below:
    "Our experiments are not philosophically perfect and without controversy; however, we believe the benefits outweigh the cost due to the inaccessibility of neuroscience in our current age. We have received several messages from adults and parents of children with neurological afflictions thanking us for making neuroscience easier to understand. We are constantly surveying the animal kingdom for easier and less invasive ways of unequivocally demonstrating neural activity. The cockroach leg preparation is the best we have found so far.
    Some disagree, and that is important. Our methods raise many ethical questions including:
    Are animal experiments for educational purposes valid?
    What is the proper way to treat fellow creatures of the Earth?
    In our classroom demonstrations we do discuss these ethical positions and take them seriously.

    When we visit high school classrooms to do workshops, we give the students and their parents a form the day before. Here is a section:
    "The equipment to be used, as well as the lessons to be followed, are experimental prototypes currently under refinement. The experiments that you will conduct are identical to or are variations on the procedures that you have seen demonstrated in class: invertebrates will be anesthetized and prepared for recording, nerve signals will be recorded, and various stimuli (tactile, thermal, light) will be applied to the preparation...
    Please note that this is a research project designed for the purpose of improving education. You will benefit by gaining additional information about the nervous system and about the proper care of live animals (invertebrates) in research....
    Risks are minimal:
    Some sharp tools (pins and scissors) will be used (you will receive proper instruction in their use);
    The invertebrates are not poisonous, do not sting or bite, and were purchased from commercial suppliers or raised in the laboratory expressly for this use;
    You might experience mild emotional discomfort caused by exposure to the invertebrates (cockroaches or earthworms) or by the surgery (removal of a cockroach leg or exposure of the earthworm nervous system – both done while the animal is anesthetized and following scientifically accepted and humane procedures). If such discomfort occurs you will be free to stop participating at any time without penalty.
    Your participation is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate there will be no negative effect on you or your relationship with your teacher..."

    1. Re:Common Objections to this work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP

    2. Re:Common Objections to this work by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      we are a startup working out of the Ann Arbor Hackerspace

      i.e. we are desperate for free publicity for our futile company

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Common Objections to this work by r_batty_00 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot of 10 years ago would have had a lively debate about the ethics of your experiments and the pro/ con of animal experiments used in education. Sadly, you can see many of the comments have devolved into first posts, Nazi comparisons and knee-jerk animal rights propaganda. Some of us old timers would have been thrilled to be able to probe neural activity in advanced biology (in addition to fetal pig dissection ). Don’t take the negative comments too personally, were not the Slashdot we one were.

  32. Releasing Your Inner Mengele!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the fictional Frankenstein played with dead parts. You want to do something useful, figure out how to make the Bilderbergers twitch.

  33. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if roaches were not already hard enough to kill.

    we will soon have, Cybernetic Zombie Roaches.

    Great just great.

  34. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    You might want to re-read the definition of oxymoron. There is no oxymoron in the phrase "I know it has yet to be tested, but it works." Whether something works or not has no bearing on whether it has gone through testing or not. Testing does not make something work. I finds out if something already works or not.

  35. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Wow, two in a row!

    So many winners, so little time to recognize them all.

  36. I guess the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they get cockroach parts to work like logic gates? I want to see the first cockroach-computer...

  37. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

    You can't say something works without testing it, you can only guess.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  38. Oh please by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    Oh please.

    Not everything that remotely sounds "Nazi" is wrong.
    Hitler was also fanatically anti-smoking, anti-animal cruelty, anti-Marxism, a vegetarian, and had a moustache.

    Yet there are many anti-smoking, or anti-animal cruelty, or vegetarian, anti-Marxist, or moustache-bearing people who are perfectly fine.

    Reductio ad Hitlerum is a logical fallacy.

    1. Re:Oh please by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Not everything that remotely sounds "Nazi" is wrong.

      No, but many things that sound Nazi certainly are. Like the characterisation of the Jews as sub-human. Which is what GP was talking about.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Oh please by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Anyway, cockroaches are clearly sub-human.
      Do you really think that all animals have the same dignity?
      Including a sponge, which has no neurons?
      So people should not go camping, for fear of stomping
      an ant?

      Clearly, beings with higher intelligence, self-awareness, conscience and free-will are superior
      to beings that are, essentially, simple robots made of carbon.

      I have no fear of eating meat. Or of killing/harming (while minimising their pain) insects for scientific experiments

  39. Absolutely. Humans are superior by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 2

    A human analog is irrelevant. Humans are not analogous to cockroaches in this way. Humans feel pain through nociceptors. Cockroaches don't have these.

    Besides that Humans can feel horror and misery that a brain as simple as a cockroaches almost certainly cannot. They do not have higher emotions and higher functions. They don't even have memory. Whatever it is like to be a cockroach, it is almost certainly nothing like what it is like to be a human.

    Thanks for a needed dose of common-sense.

    Crazy, misinformed environment activists (as opposed to reasonable, educated environment engineers) speak as if animal life was just as dignified as human life.
    Newsflash: it isn't. Humans have far greater intelligence, are self-aware, and have free-will. While animals (specially mammals) should not be needlessly mistreated, they aren't to be treated as humans either.

    If an economic project needs to put down an hectare of trees, it should be permitted unless it will harm humanity (through the destruction of environmental resources) or if the economic benefits are very small.

    1. Re:Absolutely. Humans are superior by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Cockroaches are like humans so we shouldn't hurt them? who says that?

      Not me.
      I say: play with somebody your own size, coward.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  40. Two words by axlr8or · · Score: 1

    Animal cruelty......... OK OK OK its just a...... NM

  41. i wanna try sticking those pins in my finger by issicus · · Score: 1

    while playing the piano into it.

  42. Re:Processing Scheme of the Brain Cracked!!!!!! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    A) Yes you can. It's easy. Just say it. You might be wrong. You might be right, but you can certainly say it.
    B) Whether something works or not is not dependent on whether you have tested it or not.

    The only thing that testing does is let you know if saying it works is correct or not. Of course, I presume the person that said "It hasn't been tested, but works" was using the word "tested" to mean a large scale study with controls and formal analysis. In that case, claiming that you can't say something works without testing it goes from being wrong to being absurd.

  43. Actually cockroaches can learn by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    Actually cockroaches can learn

    According to http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070927132543.htm
    cockroaches can learn.

    I still agree that a human analogy is irrelevant, though.