Slashdot Mirror


How Hackers Listened Their Way Around Google's Recaptcha

An anonymous reader writes with this story at Ars Technica: "Three self-taught hackers from the DC949 hacker collective managed to use a combination of techniques to beat ReCaptcha with 99.1% accuracy (better than most humans!)" In short, the hackers skipped the visual part of the Recaptcha system entirely, focusing on the audio alternative, which gave them a few convenient angles of attack. Google responded with changes to the system, but that doesn't minimize their accomplishment.

4 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh yeah! Not even a recaptcha to worry about!

  2. "Better than most humans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it! Make all users do a SERIES of incredibly hard recaptchas. Those who get too many correct are machines! Brilliant!

  3. Re:Weakest Link by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they can solve captchas at 99% accuracy, I hope they develop a browser toolbar or plugin I can use.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  4. they managed to correctly answer audio captcha? by ffflala · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now *that's* impressive. The closest approximation I've heard to the audio captchas I've encountered would be the few recordings I've heard that John Lennon used to give out as gifts: he'd record multiple radios playing different stations.

    I did once get an audio captcha that was almost solvable -- AFAICT, it was a conversation between C'thullu in his native tongue and Tom Waits responding in Aramaic, recorded in a crowded airport terminal that had lots of loudspeaker announcements.