Slashdot Mirror


SSID As the New Community Bulletin Board and Yard Sign

Hugh Pickens writes "Megan Garber writes that wireless routers have become the lawn signs of the digital age, particularly in large apartment buildings, where almost every unit has a unique Wi-Fi network that will be detected in turn by all the other unique Wi-Fi networks. SSIDs can be a cheeky, geeky way to broadcast messages to your immediate neighbors. Most of us keep it simple with '275_Elm_Street,' 'Apt23,' or 'my_network,' but some get more creative with names like: 'Apt112IHaveYourMail,' 'PrettyFlyForAWiFi,' or 'WeCanHearYouHavingSex' — a great way to freak out your annoying neighbors without hiding in their bushes or peeping in their windows late at night. Now the team at OpenSignalMaps, which maintains a database of geolocated Wi-Fi access points, analyzed the data they've collected about wireless routers to see whether Wi-Fi names are 'being used to fly political colors' and have found, globally, 1,140 results for 'Obama' and an additional six for 'Romney' — an indication not necessarily of Romney's popularity relative to the president's, but of the attention that four years as president can confer. 'There's something uniquely contemporary and incredibly old-school about that kind of broadcasting: It's messaging meant only for your immediate neighbors,' writes Garber. 'The politicized network names are like lawn signs for people who don't have lawns.'"

115 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Something I have been doing for about a decade by aisnota · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can blurt out telephone numbers to get out of my Internets or even an advertisement for a limited audience.

    SSID fields are just a rather new entity in this arena.

    Have fun with them while Wifi AP points still have meaning technologically.

    --
    http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
  2. Signs of butter. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    SSID As the New Community Bulletin Board and Yard Sign

    How about WeLuvURob?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Signs of butter. by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      SSID As the New Community Bulletin Board and Yard Sign

      How about WeLuvURob?

      Dude, Rob moved out a while ago.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  3. Ron Paul by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

    quite likely has more than Obama and Mittens combined as using ssid was heavily promoted by supporters as a technique to raise name awareness.

    1. Re:Ron Paul by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reason Romney is so under-represented is that "Romney" is actually more vanilla than "Linksys".

    2. Re:Ron Paul by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Huh??? I don't know what you mean by this. But I've never seen "Romney" as an SSID in all my life. "Linksys" and "2Wirexxx", all the freaking time!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Ron Paul by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      Not sure if troll or lack of sense of humor...

      The joke is that Romney is so bland he's more "vanilla" than the default SSIDs.

    4. Re:Ron Paul by curunir · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's because any AP with an SSID of Romney will not respond consistently. Then again, any AP with an SSID of Obama is heavily compromised and, even when given full power, does almost nothing.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    5. Re:Ron Paul by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Obama SSIDs will also arrest and torture you if you leak the key.

  4. Attitude by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 3, Funny

    I saw "GetYourOwnDamnWifi" the other day. Ok guy, I get the point.

    1. Re:Attitude by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      My favorite is "GetOffMyLAN!".

    2. Re:Attitude by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      My previous neighbors had "Not Your Internet" or sometimes "Not Your Wifi."

      Of course, living in bumfuck Indiana, most popular is "belikin." Ho hum.

      In the middle of the building where I work I detected a "Grab My Dick" the other day setting up a Macintosh. Still don't understand what that is about...

    3. Re:Attitude by guttentag · · Score: 1

      I saw "GetYourOwnDamnWifi" the other day. Ok guy, I get the point.

      You mean someone else is using my SSID? Dammit... now I'll have to change it to "GetOffMyLawn," "GetOffMySpectrum" or, if all else fails, natalielikesmariahcarey.

    4. Re:Attitude by thrillseeker · · Score: 2

      My neighbor has "PoweredByBiscuitsAndGravy"

    5. Re:Attitude by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 2

      One of my neighbors is "FuckBitchesGetMoney"

    6. Re:Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw "titties an panties" the other day and it was unsecured. Make of that what you will...

    7. Re:Attitude by game+kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You young WPAsnappers, back in the day we had to WEP those freeloaders and we enjoyed it!"

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    8. Re:Attitude by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Within range of my apartment, there's currently about a dozen 2WIRE843-type network names. Not sure why so many people have that particular brand of router (maybe Charter rents them?), but it's still surprising to me that everyone opted for the default SSID considering this complex is mainly comprised of young professionals, many of whom work for EPIC doing software development. Certainly not a demographic I would figure would leave the default SSID in place.

      My SSID has been "RECALL SCOTT WALKER" for a year now, but nobody's ever said anything about it, and we're pretty social with our neighbors (this is a dog building, and all of us dog lovers are very friendly with each other). Come this Tuesday I'll be changing it, hopefully to "BUH BYE SCOTT WALKER".

    9. Re:Attitude by Technician · · Score: 1

      I can see H1N1Virus near here. Same point.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    10. Re:Attitude by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      I run "Zombie" and "Network 23".

      But one day I may set up an open access point with a special hacked DNS that redirects everything to the same server, and why not Slashdot? At least it's amusing for a few. Or maybe I should direct everyone to Pravda.

      I'm open for suggestions - as long as it's reasonably decent.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:Attitude by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's hard to beat Time Cube for sheer WTF??!!?? batshit crazy...

    12. Re:Attitude by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What is the advantage to changing one's SSID?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Attitude by mcavic · · Score: 1

      2-Wire routers are popular for DSL and Uverse, but Charter rents wireless routers now too.

    14. Re:Attitude by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Well, if I was one of those people with the 2Wire*** SSIDs, I would think to be able to find it easier in the drop down...like I said there's a dozen that are virtually identical.

      That's admittedly minor, though. There's really no advantage to speak of, but then again, look at how many people actually pay for vanity license plates which also serves no advantage whatsoever (and costs money out of pocket, as opposed to changing the router's SSID). People just like putting their own personal stamp on their things, I guess.

      In my last building, there were two networks that were obviously pointed at each other: 'GREEN BAY SUCKS' and 'THE BEARS SUCK'. Surprised nobody mentioned the VIkings...

    15. Re:Attitude by Domminir · · Score: 1

      wow... just wow. I'm really not sure what I just read there.

    16. Re:Attitude by telekon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I liked the one that was 'HideYourKids,HideYourWifi'.

      Ironically, it was broadcasting hits SSID.

      --

      To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.

    17. Re:Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      2Wire gateway/modems have been stock equipment for AT&T DSL for several years now.

    18. Re:Attitude by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Surprised so many people around here have DSL. Maybe they're all ex-Charter customers that finally got sick of their shit...

      Surprised so many people here apparently rent a modem, too. Like I said, this is primarily IT professionals in this area and that's definitely a demographic I would figure would own their own hardware. I haven't rented a modem from my ISP since '05...

      My dad rents a modem/router from Charter (don't think his is 2-Wire, though). He can't even access the firmware outside of the SSID and encryption, it's locked out. I don't think I would ever feel comfortable not being able to fully access my hardware, even if I was renting...

    19. Re:Attitude by sdnoob · · Score: 1

      Nice to see we're not the only cheeseheads with a RECALLWALKER wireless network.

      ____

      The most common default name we see here belong to Verizon's wireless mobile hotspots. With incumbent carriers like Centurytel (sucks) and Charter (sucks even more), a lot of people, even within their coverage areas, opt for Verizon or USCC instead -- despite the higher cost for slower speeds and the (typical) 5GB monthly quota.

      Driving around town, ones like GETYOUROWNWIFI are also pretty common. What is really stupid, though, are the ones set up with phone numbers, addresses, or people's names... and Centurytel techs here take the proverbial cake: they routinely set up a subscriber's name as the network name then turn around and use their phone number as the password. This on top of them using a small number of default passwords (such as "abcd1234") they use for PPPOE and POP3.

    20. Re:Attitude by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Is Zombocom still around? That would give them a good "WTF?" or of course if you want to irritate the crap out of them you can't go wrong with a classic like badger badger badger. Any of the conspiracy sites would be good for doing a little mind screwing, above top secret or prison planet would do...sigh. there is just so many ways one could have fun with such an idea, i may have to do that one myself!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:Attitude by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised no one has mentioned the classic, "FBI Mobile Surveillance Van."
      I bet that one will freak out a lot more people than "WeCanHereYouHavingSex."

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    22. Re:Attitude by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Yup. Cheap POS. Mine died shortly after warranty was up.

    23. Re:Attitude by moj0e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One advantage of changing your default SSID a vanilla install is that it makes it harder to crack.
      The SSID is used as salt in the encryption mechanism.

      Here is an article that describes it in more detail:
      http://netsecurity.about.com/od/secureyourwifinetwork/a/WPA2-Crack.htm

      Plus... having a goofy SSID is fun :) Mine is "Dialup".

    24. Re:Attitude by farrellj · · Score: 1

      "DHS Secret Listeningpost"
      "NSA Listeningpost"
      "CSE Listeningpost"
      "FBI SWAT TEAM5"
      "RCMP HQ"

      "SKYnet Node36363283856"
      "Tyrell Corp Intranet"
      "ENCOM Intranet"
      "Red Pill"

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    25. Re:Attitude by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      i know a guy that uses mac filtering to send anyone who isn't authorised to lemon party. no matter what you enter you get redirected to it. not many people try to steal his wifi

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    26. Re:Attitude by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I figured out that this YouTube video would probably annoy the heck out of anyone: Click Me! - and it's still work-safe.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    27. Re:Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Screw Walker! How dare a duly elected governor fulfill his campaign promises! The only legitimate elections are the ones leftists win. Any means to regain power is legitimate!

    28. Re:Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      or "Verizon Fraud Division", "Comcast Security", "AirAmerica", "FusionOps", "DHS", etc.

      City PD, FD, County Courthouse, IT Dept, EMS, etc. do show up in my available networks. (It's a small town.)

      "Caution: Do not taunt Happy Fun Wireless!"

    29. Re:Attitude by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      How about a flash version of the WOPR from Wargames?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    30. Re:Attitude by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Get a nintendo wii, go to a populated building, and leave your access point as "Linksys". Enjoy figuring out which one belongs to you.

    31. Re:Attitude by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Probably AT&T. Regardless, the 2wires are DSL devices. Sadly, most of them are still running WEP out of the box, with the default unit-specific numeric key on a sticker under the unit. Ridiculously easy spying for government types.

    32. Re:Attitude by anubi · · Score: 1

      That is a good one. I'll have to run that up the flagpole at Starbucks when I drop by...

      What you do is set up a "ad-hoc" network with your machine,,, then put whatever you want as the SSID. Just secure yourself with a password...nasty one... you don't have to remember it because you are going to delete the whole thing once its serves its purpose..

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    33. Re:Attitude by n8k99 · · Score: 1

      holy shit!

      --
      For some reason my fountain pen doesn't work here.
    34. Re:Attitude by Rary · · Score: 2

      Plus... having a goofy SSID is fun :) Mine is "Dialup".

      I'm thinking of changing mine to "Honeypot". That outta make somebody think twice before trying to get in.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    35. Re:Attitude by mikael · · Score: 1

      Latest wifi routers have single button pairing. You press a button on the router, connect to it using your wifi device, and in seconds encryption keys have been swapped.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    36. Re:Attitude by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Which isn't exactly secure, especially if used out of the box to avoid changing the SSID and other settings.

    37. Re:Attitude by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      With Uverse, you have to have the 2wire router. I have my own router behind it and disabled the wireless. I have been thinking of setting up a dedicated wifi that does not go to the internet but redirects to a local "file-sharing" server. maybe an html page to explain things or download and upload via ftp or sftp (maybe an html upload option).
      Thought it might be a nice experiment.

  5. IP addresses by unixisc · · Score: 1

    If the bulk of them are IPv4, they are going to consume a lot of the residual IPv4 addresses out there. Please tell me that the bulk of these access points and routers support IPv6, so that we won't have a whole lot of needless landfill from products that could be perfectly useful as networks embrace IPv6 in greater number

    1. Re:IP addresses by rs79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If the bulk of them are IPv4, they are going to consume a lot of the residual IPv4 addresses out there."

      dear noob;
      we get it you didn't get any ip addresses before 95. please stop whining. invent something better
      (and i've seen better and it doesn't look like v6)

      If you were to freeze the configuration of the V4 core network right now, everything would work just fine. All our stuff talks to our other stuff. We're not running out of addresses that are already deployed and running the core network, it's only the edges of the network where more addresses are needed. So use whatever you want there and as long as it rides over the stable V4 core, you're fine. Pretty much fucked though if your new protocol doesn't do that well.

      Let us know how your parallel network builds out, maybe we'll use it as an I/O device one day when you're done building it.

      The thing to keep in eye on this IPV6 day is not what V6 links work, but what parts of the V4 core they break. Like last year when Hurricane Electric broke the V4 link to ISC. Talk about irony-in-a-can. Talk about broken. Talk about didn't notice. Talk about H.E. got unplugged.

      Please please please don't break the net again this year. Kashpureff went to jail for disruptions an order of magnitude less than this.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:IP addresses by swillden · · Score: 2

      You do know that IP != DNS, and that most of those parked domains don't consume an IP address, right?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:IP addresses by kwark · · Score: 1

      "But they should have made IPV6 backwards compatible and just used numbers instead of hex. We humans just don't think in hex"

      Q: So what is your ipv6 adress
      A: what format would you like:
      decimal: 11579208 92373161 95423570 98500868 79078532 69984665 64056403 94575840 07913129 639936
      (added some spaces to pass the lame filter)
      hex: ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
      octets: 255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255.255

      You don't have to think that much about ipv6 addresses, netmask got a bit simpeler. And the hex notation are small grouped numbers just like you propose.

    4. Re:IP addresses by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      What planet do you live on where you can read hex as fluently as numbers?

      They should have simply added extra octets in such a way that 20 years down the line we can easily add more if needed. Going from 4 to 6 would have solved any addressing problems for the foreseeable future and sub-netting conventions and such would have remained the same. There is no practical need to have so many addresses, it makes the whole system incredibly cumbersome. IP6 is just as needlessly complex as 32 digit phone numbers.

      The market is biatchslapping the people who came up with IPv6 for its stupid design decisions as evidenced by its poor adoption.

    5. Re:IP addresses by tepples · · Score: 1

      Any site supporting HTTPS does consume an IP address, at least until Windows XP and Android 2.x fall out of use.

    6. Re:IP addresses by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Now imagine its 3AM, you haven't had ANY coffee yet, and they are screaming at you that parts of the network aren't working. Quick, could you look at a whole pile of IPV6 numbers in a list and spot which ones don't conform? Bet most can't because our brains just don't process hexadecimal nearly as well as it does numbers. But if they gave you that same list in IPV4 octets you'd spot the 194. numbers in less than 3 seconds.

      Hell they could have gone to 7 or 8 and it would have still been easy, because triplets are easy for us humans to whip off, just like "the phone number song" where people got dot, dot dot duh, dot dot duh, dot dot duh duh. Instead what we got is over done, needlessly complicated, and obviously done by engineers that haven't spent a day in the field. Hell how many years did they scream "You don't need that!" when it came to NAT and DHCP? I remember the first couple of years they screamed up and down "Just give everything its own public IP!", yeah, like THAT won't be a security nightmare, nope, what could go wrong?

      I'm just glad I'm out of corporate IT, I'd hate to try to install this giant clusterfuck onto some large corporation and troubleshoot the mess, what a nightmare! Oh and look at how the other posters argue up and down that humans will have NO problem reading hex just as easily as octets, I bet these same ubernerds walk around with binary watches and wonder why everyone looks at them as weirdos. Whether they choose to accept it or not the brain processes numbers and letters differently and most are MUCH better at counting in decimal numbers, that is just how humans work.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:IP addresses by kwark · · Score: 2

      "Thank you. Now imagine its 3AM, you haven't had ANY coffee yet, and they are screaming at you that parts of the network aren't working. Quick, could you look at a whole pile of IPV6 numbers in a list and spot which ones don't conform? Bet most can't because our brains just don't process hexadecimal nearly as well as it does numbers. But if they gave you that same list in IPV4 octets you'd spot the 194. numbers in less than 3 seconds."

      You do know you don't have to use "random" ipv6 addresses? Use usefull patterns/prefixes if you are afraid you'll miss the tree your are looking for in your forest. Or write a script to convert hex to octets if that helps you. But be sure to use a fixed font, that helps a lot with hex.

    8. Re:IP addresses by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Respectfully, what? I don't feel like writing 128 bits in decimals.Sorry, I enjoy my hexadecimal ethernet mac addresses, thank you very much. And IPv6 is compatiable with that. I will not succumb to NAT by my ISP because of the lack of address space. IPv4 was NEVER intended the way it has been utilized or to scale that large. If you only knew how much wasted energy is needed for the core routers to support IPv4 vs IPv6....

    9. Re:IP addresses by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      But they should have made IPV6 backwards compatible

      Could you explain how? Because I've seen so many people suggest this, and not one has explained how it would be done.

      I believe the primary reason is because it's not possible, but maybe you'll be the person to correct me.

    10. Re:IP addresses by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      You do know you don't have to use "random" ipv6 addresses? Use usefull patterns/prefixes if you are afraid you'll miss the tree your are looking for in your forest. Or write a script to convert hex to octets if that helps you. But be sure to use a fixed font, that helps a lot with hex.

      Or they could have designed it properly in the first place so you don't have to bother with any of that.

      That all might work groovy pants if you're the one who set it up, What about the contractor like me who has over 100 customer sites with all of them having their own "useful patterns/prefixes" that only makes sense to them? Sure there is some variability with IP4, but there's not that much. I hope the IT department likes me calling them every time there's a networking problem.

      "write a script to convert hex to octets"

      Hmmmm, reminds me of the phrase, "Just recompile the kernel". Hey hairyfeet, is this starting to remind you of something?

    11. Re:IP addresses by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Now imagine its 3AM, you haven't had ANY coffee yet, and they are screaming at you that parts of the network aren't working. Quick, could you look at a whole pile of IPV6 numbers in a list and spot which ones don't conform? Bet most can't because our brains just don't process hexadecimal nearly as well as it does numbers. But if they gave you that same list in IPV4 octets you'd spot the 194. numbers in less than 3 seconds.

      Hell they could have gone to 7 or 8 and it would have still been easy, because triplets are easy for us humans to whip off, just like "the phone number song" where people got dot, dot dot duh, dot dot duh, dot dot duh duh. Instead what we got is over done, needlessly complicated, and obviously done by engineers that haven't spent a day in the field. Hell how many years did they scream "You don't need that!" when it came to NAT and DHCP? I remember the first couple of years they screamed up and down "Just give everything its own public IP!", yeah, like THAT won't be a security nightmare, nope, what could go wrong?

      Anybody who knows the first thing about an IPv6 address would know that the lower half of the address is don't care, so they'd just look at the link - the first 4 words (i.e. the top half) and then troubleshoot it to see if any of the nodes are working. If it turns out that some nodes on the network are working and some ain't, then the ones that ain't working are the ones that would need to be looked it. Maybe their OS ain't configured properly w/ IPv6 or the addresses, or maybe, the DHCP6 server didn't include them, or whatever. Has nothing to do w/ what sort of notation the address uses.

      As kwark pointed out above, an address like 1234:5678:9abc:def0:fedc:ba98:7654:3210 could be represented alternatively in decimal, in your more readable form, as 4660:22136:39612:57072:65244:47768:30292:12816. Would this have been easier to remember? Or are you really objecting to the addresses being grown from 32 to 128 bits? Given the amount of work we've had to go through in getting people to even consider a global change in all networking equipment, I'd say it's a very good piece of foresight for them to have designed it in a way that it's not likely to need another upgrade again in our lifetime.

      Going to hex was the handiest solution in the circumstances, or else, instead of 4 octets that you have now for IPv4, you'd have had 16 octets instead. Would that have been any easier to manage? Would the network engineer find 123:45:67:89:98:76:54:32:198:76:54:32:123:45:67:89 easier to remember than a hex string? And how?

    12. Re:IP addresses by kwark · · Score: 1

      "Hmmmm, reminds me of the phrase, "Just recompile the kernel". Hey hairyfeet, is this starting to remind you of something?"

      So writing a script to do some text transformation equals to recompiling a kernel! It's about creating small tools to make your live/work easier, you are a strange sort of contractor if you are not willing to mold stuff to your needs (unless your clients are paying by the hour).

      But whatever you think or experience as a problem, get used to it and adapt since ipv4 will run out of space eventually. Stick to the ipv4-in-ipv6 for internal use and just learn the new tricks for connecting to the outside world.

    13. Re:IP addresses by mikael · · Score: 1

      It was worse 16 years ago. At the time voice traffic still exceeded data traffic but everyone realized digital was going to take over, in particular ATM. The argument then was how wide the data bus for hardware systems should be . Computer people wanted 64 bits. Voice people wanted 32 bits. They couldn't agree so compromised on 48 bits.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:IP addresses by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, BTW Crosshair there is a trademark for this attitude so next time someone pulls it on you just give 'em a link to Use Esoteric Workarounds because using a 40 step hoop jump is ALWAYS better than just designing the damned thing with common sense!..../facepalm/

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  6. Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is that the same Obama that is overseeing the PIPA/SOPA/CIPA/ACTA and $2 billion Utah Spying mega project? How quaint that people would use the very medium he and other politicians (bipartisan cabal) are trying to thwart to show their support...

    1. Re:Obama by hendridm · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to an article posted yesterday, 46% of Americans are crazy.

    2. Re:Obama by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, that's lower than I expected.

    3. Re:Obama by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Fuck you for bashing anybody who doesn't share your beliefs.

  7. Truth in advertising by linuxwrangler · · Score: 2

    When I first got a laptop with wifi I loaded Kismet and took the laptop with me on some errands. My favorite: HoneyPot_comeGetSnarf.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  8. A more useful analysis by Beorytis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would like to see an analysis of the names compared to the frequency of unauthorized access attempts. What names are likely to generate indifference?

    1. Re:A more useful analysis by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I would like to see an analysis of the names compared to the frequency of unauthorized access attempts. What names are likely to generate indifference?

      One of the WiFi SSIDs around my building is "ClickHereForIdentifyTheft". I nominate that one.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  9. Near here.. by Keruo · · Score: 1

    There's a road going near the building, and across the street, there's a bus stop
    One of the neighbours has wlan called IsItColdAtTheBusStop?

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  10. Political Propaganda Statistics with SSIDs? C'mon by adosch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's always going to be American/United States bias in the world outside CONUS, so why even include them as part of your study? The world doesn't re-elect our president, United States citizens do. In places where I live where electoral votes count the majority, it gets comfortable to feel as though you vote doesn't count anyway.

    Hate to be pessimistic, but this is pretty meaningless. Out of the millions of SSIDs in the US alone, TFA writer could only confer with 400 of them for a sample and make some half ass meaningful attempt at analysis? That's hardly anything worth blogging about. This is no more useful than it would be me using my neighbor's regular smoke breaks outside as a counter for how many people like fresh air during the sunlight hours of the day. Stupid.

  11. The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by Quick+Reply · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make it an open network but don't connect it to anything. Some people will spend hours trying to connect.

    Works better when it is in range of busy public spaces.

    Also works equally as well with "Free Porn".

    1. Re:The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by stevenh2 · · Score: 2

      Even more evil: Redirect all websites to a page that says the network is busy and to wait one minute. And always display that. People will wait forever to connect.

    2. Re:The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by bmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Always a classic:

      Upside down Internet.

      Howto.

      http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      My next project: A network with the SSID "ThisRouterIsUpsideDown", with some specific settings applied.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by vmlemon · · Score: 2

      At least in the part of the UK where I am, I've found that to be a great idea as far as reverse-psychology is concerned. (If you set the SSID to "Free Internet Access", and disable encryption, no-one will connect to it - but if you set it to anything else, pretty much everyone with a smartphone or laptop will attempt to connect).

    5. Re:The most evil SSID... "Free Internet" by Malvineous · · Score: 1

      If it's 802.11b/g you can also run it on channel 14, which many devices will see but can't connect to unless they've been told they're in Japan.

  12. Well, OK... by Thad+Zurich · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but I'm not giving up "FBI Surveillance Van".

    1. Re:Well, OK... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I had it first, give it back!

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  13. Just another way to have some fun... by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 3, Funny
    My access point has dual radios - they are named B(. )( .)bies and Skynet.

    Boobies is the more visible one (2.4 Ghz b/g/n), and everyone who comes over with a smartphone or laptop finds it amusing, the ladies moreso than the guys. I have a second vlan on it for when friends bring their children over with ipods, kindles and such; it doesn't seem right to tell a 10 year old to just grab boobies!!

    --
    When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
  14. Oh thank goodness by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Funny

    'WeCanHearYouHavingSex' — a great way to freak out your annoying neighbors without hiding in their bushes or peeping in their windows late at night.

    I was looking for a better way to freak out my neighbours than hiding in their bushes or peeping in their windows late at night.

    Thanks slashdot!

    1. Re:Oh thank goodness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I was looking for a better way to freak out my neighbours than hiding in their bushes or peeping in their windows late at night.

      Try FavaBeansAndANiceChianti

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Re:Security vs. Creativity by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  16. Its nice that people are being creative, but... by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many times do you look at your wifi SSID list? Its been at least over a year for me cause whenever I need to connect I tell the machine to go direct to mine, which is not broadcast, and automatically connect.

    I think the average person is about the same, they want their shit connected, and wont ever look at it again until something messes up. So "SSID As the New Community Bulletin Board and Yard Sign" is an interesting thought, and may be happening in some few areas, but its a big leap since chances are no one will ever read them.

    1. Re:Its nice that people are being creative, but... by swillden · · Score: 1

      If your SSID is non-broadcast, and your laptop is set to automatically connect to it, your laptop does that by continually broadcasting your SSID whenever it's not connected. So you're actually broadcasting your SSID to more people and places than if you set your router to broadcast it. Luckily, the SSID really has no security value.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  17. depends on the neighborhood. by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1
    My SSID is "DEA Surveillance Van".

    I know it's fooled at least one person.

  18. More fun SSID tricks by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    I set my phone up to broadcast "IRSAuditor28401938" and took a stroll around the wealthy area of town. Almost as fun as yelling "migras!" at a construction site.

  19. Using SSID to send data by cslewis2007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone managed to send data using this technique? I realize that the data payload would be very small, but considering how fast you can switch SSIDs I imagine this should be possible. The main advantage is that you wouldn't need to actually assign an IP address to your computer in order to receive data - which should reduce the potential for malicious access. I did a quick google search and didn't find anything under "send data using ssid". Anyone seen something like this? What is the theoretical / practical data throughput? Could multiple routers be used in parallel to increase throughput? (like in the old days of bonding ISDN channels together)

    1. Re:Using SSID to send data by vmlemon · · Score: 1

      Not quite the same thing - but Nintendo products (especially the DS) with "Download Play" functionality embed a bitmap image, plus a synopsis related to a program binary into multiple Beacon packets, and send it in repeated rotation.

    2. Re:Using SSID to send data by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      No fail. Very clever.

      The sender generally has an IP address. The receiver may not have one yet (generally acquires one after selecting an access point to connect to). If the receiver never connects and just browses the list of available access points, then, voila!

    3. Re:Using SSID to send data by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
      In my reading of AC#1's reply, the single word "FAIL", I interpretated that reply to mean that the premise that no IP address need be assigned to the receiver was incorrect. I didn't note the possibility that "FAIL" was meant to apply to the "reduce the potential for malicious access" part instead.

      Furthermore, AC#1's parent post didn't contrast this method with the clearly superior broadcast method that had at that time not yet been mentioned (the first mention of that was more than 3 hours later). His post merely stated:

      The main advantage is that you wouldn't need to actually assign an IP address to your computer in order to receive data - which should reduce the potential for malicious access.

      which is true, is it not?

      Had AC#1 thought to include a few additional words to flesh out his argument, perhaps a poor fool like me would have not misinterpreted the overly succinct gem that is his reply, and you and I could have saved our typing for something useful. And then, profit!

  20. My neighbors do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    They broadcast their idiocy with such gems as "WHITEPOWER" and "KILLNIGGERS". So technology is making it easier to identify the assholes in society. For a while, I powered up a spare AP connected to nothing, and broadcast "OURNEIGHBORSAREIDIOTS".

    1. Re:My neighbors do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if they named them "BLACKPOWER" and "KILLCRACKERS" you wouldn't have bothered making this post.

      And you'd be quite wrong, Mr AC.

  21. As always this was already done before by tian2992 · · Score: 2

    I am surprised to see that much ruckus about this "OpenSignalMaps" when Wigle http://wigle.net/ already existed for a while, and has more than 61 million networks recorded around the world. I do know they don't have the fancy Web2.0 website, but they have been doing this before that even got popular...

  22. SSID fun by anomaly65 · · Score: 1

    "Disable Wireless" and "Police Department" are two of my favorites. "404 not found" is another fun SSID.

  23. Sort of worthless by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Unless you are *looking* for AP's, once you are setup you never will see that your neighbor is being a jerk. your machine just auto-connects to yours, and you are off and running.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  24. ParasiteNet by ODBOL · · Score: 1

    Check it out in Cory Doctorow's Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town .

    Sure, it's only fiction. But my home wireless, which I invite you to use whenever you're within range, is called ParasiteNet.

    --
    Mike O'Donnell http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
  25. So that's where ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the Usenet went. Thanks for finding it for us.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  26. All Apple? by tgv · · Score: 1

    How come all screen shots are iOS or OSX? I don't think I've seen anything else...

  27. Fake access point by no1nose · · Score: 1

    Now I want to get a $15 Belkin and just use it as a yard sign. It wouldn't be connected to the internet at all.

  28. Re:Political Propaganda Statistics with SSIDs? C'm by icebike · · Score: 1

    Out of the millions of SSIDs in the US alone, TFA writer could only confer with 400 of them for a sample

    400 is what you can find in an afternoon of war driving in suburbia, or an hour walking around apartment complexes with a wardriving app on your smartphone.

    But realistically, with WIFI being such a short range medium getting a significantly larger sample with a non-google scale budget is pretty problematic. You can't detect them very far away, and the more crowded the wifi space the smaller the detection distance due to unfavorable signal to noise ratio.

    To the rescue: http://wigle.net/ a collection of 57 million crowd-sourced, geocoded access points gleaned via various means, but most of them with a smart phone application like Wigle Wifi Wardriving available free for android. Simply turn that on, put on your headphones and go for a walk and when you get back you will have very accurate maps of dozens of routers. Log into Wigle.com, upload, and contribute to the map which can also be searched and zoomed. (Their server is prone to slashdotting).

    They could have worked a deal with Wigle.net to mine their SSID names, sorted in order by the first 6 letters, and discarded the first 98% and come up with a far more interesting collection.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  29. I have weird fandom names by CptNerd · · Score: 1

    For my home WiFi I have "Venture Labs", and for my mobile 4G hotspot I have "Central Dogma".

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  30. Re:Security vs. Creativity by swillden · · Score: 1

    Hiding your SSID isn't a security feature.

    Very true.

    My brother-in-law has an equally... er... effective strategy. He set his SSID to "broken" in hopes that people wouldn't see that and decide not to try to use it. He also has WPA2 with a reasonable password, though.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  31. Re:Security vs. Creativity by swillden · · Score: 1

    in hopes that people wouldn't see that and decide not to try to use it

    Er, s/wouldn't/would/

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  32. Favorite SSID by blakelarson · · Score: 1

    My favorite SSID is "Limited Connectivity".

  33. Re:Political Propaganda Statistics with SSIDs? C'm by asylumx · · Score: 1

    That's hardly anything worth blogging about.

    I'm sorry, but there aren't any prerequisites for blogging. I'm not sure where you got the expectation that things are "worth blogging about" but I've seen some pretty nonsensical drivel on blogs many times.

  34. amusing ones by bored · · Score: 1

    One of my favorite ones, is a house about 8 doors down, which has a WPA secured network and a WEP one called "FBISecureInvest" or some such. Which I find funny, because while Im 100% sure its not the FBI, I'm still not going to mess with it.

  35. Re:Political Propaganda Statistics with SSIDs? C'm by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Out of the millions of SSIDs in the US alone, TFA writer could only confer with 400 of them for a sample and make some half ass meaningful attempt at analysis? That's hardly anything worth blogging about.

    Actually, the study was based on a database of 75 million geolocated access points, as compiled by OpenSignalMaps. You might like to read the original study report to get a better idea of what's going on here.

    The actual disappointing thing is that, out of 75 million access points, they only found about 1,200 hits for "obama" -- which doesn't seem to have any real statistical significance at all. Furthermore, there were only 6 hits for "romney" -- probably because a lot of these access points were polled over the last several years, and that name had little relevance until fairly recently.

    Other than that, these people noticed access points with funny names (as many people on this thread have noted) and decided to try to do some research. Nothing to get worked up about.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  36. Wigle is better by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Wigle allows you to view from the national level, impressive to see how the world is covered. Wigle is a simple and informative app. Also the google maps integration with wigle seems to be better than the opensignal page. I keep it running while driving, it's interesting to see just nodes you've discovered on the map.

  37. My SSID by kheldan · · Score: 2

    I am a fan of using "NeverNeverLAN"

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  38. Re:Political Propaganda Statistics with SSIDs? C'm by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

    The real problem with this survey is that they limited it to America.

    Obama is nothing and Romney is huge in Amercia.

    http://gawker.com/5914880/chinese-owner-of-amerciacom-says-romney-typo-is-helping-him-fund-his-sons-college-education

  39. Did they look at the full name? by downhole · · Score: 1

    I don't think many people named their networks just Obama (or just Romney for that matter). It'd be interesting to know how many and where are named "Go Obama!" or "Reelect Obama" or something like that vs something like "Fuck Obama". Romney hasn't done enough nationally yet to get that many people to hate him or be enthusiastic about him.

    --
    I don't reply to ACs
  40. Who On Earth Is That? by jman.org · · Score: 1

    For some years I used "PubicBroadcast" as id for the guest connection, partially to see if any neighbors would catch the typo, partially to annoy the extreme prude living across the street. The WPA2 key of course was "IReallyShouldPayForMyOwnWiFi"

  41. Doing this already for many years ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I've got 2 SSID's called "Touch This And Die" and as honeypot "shenanigans unda intuentis" ;)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  42. For the neighbors by augahyde · · Score: 1

    For my conspiracy theorist neighbor, I have "deasurveillance" and "fbisurveillance."