Slashdot Mirror


Ask the Space Command Team About All Things Sci-Fi

Marc Zicree, Doug Drexler, David Raiklen, and Neil Johnson are the guys behind the fastest funded film project ever on Kickstarter, Space Command. The project will feature a number of Star Trek vets behind the camera and a number of Trek actors are also involved, including Armin Shimerman, George Takei, Ethan Phillips and Robert Picardo. The team has graciously agreed to take some time from trying to make a crowd-funded movie, building spaceships, and exploring alien worlds to answer your questions. Ask as many as you like but please confine your questions to one per post.

27 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. What is it about? by Manip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen your kick starter page and even the video but you fail to mention: What is the overarching plot of "Space Command?"

  2. Opinion on the State of Sci-Fi in Film? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To each of you, what is your opinion on the current state of science fiction in today's films? Obviously, there's been an increase in all film categories with more movies coming out but what do you like and dislike about films in this era? Care to comment the remake of Total Recall? Or 3D in blockbusters like Avatar?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Opinion on the State of Sci-Fi in Film? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      What films? Seriously, how many sci-fi films involving space travel have there been in the last 5-10 years? Not many. Most "sci-fi" films these days are more like "Source Code", which I liked, but it didn't involve space travel in any way, and "Hunger Games", which again I'm pretty sure didn't involve space travel, but instead was just about how much the future is going to suck (didn't bother with that one myself). The only ones I can think of offhand from recently are Avatar of course, Pandorum, Moon, and that's about it, except maybe for Prometheus which isn't out yet. And "Moon" didn't really involve much space travel either; we've already been to the moon, and it's not very far away in the context of "space travel". Compared to the 70s and 80s, there's really not much in the way of sci-fi on the big screen these days.

    2. Re:Opinion on the State of Sci-Fi in Film? by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      What films? Seriously, how many sci-fi films involving space travel have there been in the last 5-10 years?

      Serenity (Although that's more than 5 years now...)
      Sunshine? (OK if you ignored the plot and watched the pretty lights)
      Star Trek 90210?
      John Carter?
      Wall-E? (OK, scraping the barrel now... you may have a point)

      On the other hand, how many have there ever been - especially if you rule out alien invasion flicks?

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  3. Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? by vlm · · Score: 2

    Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? There are no hard sci fi movies, at least from the past 20 years, or at least soft sci fi outnumbers hard sci fi by about 200 to 1. In books I'd dare say the ratios approach 50:50 or at least not as intensely skewed.

    Your kickstarter page lists Asimov and Clarke as partial inspiration implies hard sci fi, yet also has PR stuff about how people "like the look" which implies ultra-soft sci fi.

    For people who don't know the difference, just Fing google it, or wikipedia it, and the reason why its important is people who like one genre invariably can't stand the other genre and even make comments about how they can't imagine why someone would like the opposite genre. Sometimes the trash talking is the easiest way to understand the perspectives.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      Your kickstarter page lists Asimov and Clarke as partial inspiration implies hard sci fi, yet also has PR stuff about how people "like the look" which implies ultra-soft sci fi.

      For people who don't know the difference, just Fing google it, or wikipedia it, and the reason why its important is people who like one genre invariably can't stand the other genre and even make comments about how they can't imagine why someone would like the opposite genre.

      Lots of people I know (myself included) like things that are well-executed across the whole hard-soft scifi spectrum. So, I think its far from the case that people who like one of those invariably can't stand the other.

      There's obviously a noisy loud contingent that only likes one extreme, or which (however much they like things across the spectrum) demands that only one extreme (usually, the hard scifi one) be called "scifi" while preferring some other label or set of labels for the other side, but you shouldn't confuse the level of noise with the degree to which that approach is common.

    2. Re:Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? by Psion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If there's anything in the story that's beyond current physics, then it's not "hard sci-fi", and that includes artificial gravity (except that made by rotation), FTL jumping/warp drive, etc. "

      I think your criteria for hard SF is too restrictive. Traditionally, the difference between hard and soft SF is that hard SF focuses on a realistic and logical application of science and technology, while soft SF focuses on social or non-scientific issues in a fictional setting.

      While some authors prefer to restrict themselves to a rigorous application of known-science only, others allow notions such as FTL and/or artificial gravity to creep in to enable their stories to be told. Peter Hamilton, Arthur C. Clarke, Ben Bova, Isaac Asimov, Robert Forward, James Hogan, and many others have written arguably hard science fiction stories that break the rules you've defined.

      I'd argue that hard/soft sf exists on a continuum ranging from the extreme of authors who would meet your criteria, to the extreme of authors like Ray Bradbury who prefer to write social commentaries with murky applications of science at best.

    3. Re:Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If there's anything in the story that's beyond current physics, then it's not "hard sci-fi"

      What about unconfirmed theoretical predictions of current physics, like wormholes?

      Pitch Black appears to involve interplanetary travel, which again can't be hard sci-fi unless it's a generation ship that rotates to generate gravity, and while I haven't seen the movie, I doubt that's the ship they depicted.

      Pitch Black has aliens in it, so I'd assume that disqualifies it harder than the magical gravity -- especially since you could easily re-write the movie with the magical gravity removed, but without the aliens there's no plot.

      Unless going beyond current biology doesn't count?

      There's very, very few "hard sci-fi" movies in existence that I can even think of. Even 2001 didn't really count; it had the magical monoliths.

      Huh. And all this time I thought the term "hard sci-fi" was relevant to my interests. But if 2001 and Contact don't count then, well, it turns out whether something is "hard sci-fi" is meaningless to me. :/

      What's the term for Sci-Fi that treats all elements that are related to known physics and technology in an accurate and rigorous way, but is also allowed to speculate on the unknown or incorporate other unexplained elements?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Hard sci fi or Soft sci fi? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      According to the purists here on Slashdot, you're wrong. Anything that violates currently-known rules of physics is "soft sci-fi" or even "fantasy", and therefore "bad". Just wait, you'll see tons of posts from the hard sci-fi purists espousing this very viewpoint.

  4. Hollywood accounting by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment on how "hollywood accounting" and "kickstarter accounting" interact with each other, if at all.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  5. Why are there wings in space? by Tim12s · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hi,

    Why are there wings in space? Surely we should have ships without wings and we should have a LOT more robotic mining & self replicating mining factories!

    Thanks,
    -Tim

    PS. From a humanity inspiration perspective the self replicating mining factories just make sense. Mine it, melt it, print it = new space ship; new factory.

    1. Re:Why are there wings in space? by vlm · · Score: 2

      Why are there wings in space?

      I recently watched the "Star Wars" hexology or 6-ology or whatever and noticed all the spacecraft have jet engines, both stylistically and audibly. Which is a little weird in space. Then again the whole point of the series is "knights in shining armor fighting with swords over princesses" so its not the most anachronistic feature of the movies anyway.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Why are there wings in space? by stillnotelf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I recently watched the "Star Wars" hexology or 6-ology or whatever

      Did you mean trilogy? There are only three, right?

    3. Re:Why are there wings in space? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's based on the principle of a lever. To maneuver in space, to turn a craft on its axis, it is easier to place smaller engines far away from the center of mass. Consider the Babylon 5 Star Fury, or the X-Wing fighter, or even the nose thrusters on the vipers in the recent Battlestar Galactica. Now, if you have a craft that is going to be doing "interface operations", ie working both in space and in the atmosphere, then having wings makes sense. While in atmo, the wings act like wings. While in space, they act like pontoons to hold the maneuvering thrusters.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Why are there wings in space? by camperdave · · Score: 2

      There are engines being built that are air breathing while in the atmosphere, but run off of on-board oxygen when in space. I think they are for the Skylon rocket-plane.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  6. Release plans? by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it will actually allow us to MAKE the first of our four initial SPACE COMMAND films

    So you've got the bills paid... that means you release to a torrent site and make profit off tee shirt sales or signed movie posters or ?

    If you're not willing to CC license, then how much more would the kickstarter have to be to CC license?

    Is product placement in the financial picture as per above (like they happen to use ipads as tablets, or whatever they use as a computer interface boots up with a Apple logo?)

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  7. How do you sustain it? by mattr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is your sustainable funding and distribution model, and do you see any potential interaction with commercial spaceflight endeavors?

  8. Writing intentions by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks very promising. Interested to see what comes of it.

    Short question: How will you keep this show from ending in suck?

    Longer version of question: see here. The Lifespan of a TV Show.

    Good stories have a beginning, middle, and end. Wasted stories start out good but then get stretched out to the point that the writer simply loses interest and is phoning it in. Television suffers from this disproportionately because network execs are selling viewer eyeballs to advertisers and don't really give a damn what goes between the commercial breaks. They'll keep a show going until it's no longer profitable and cancel it. Hence you get what's depicted in the Cracked post above. I can think of a lot of shows that started out strong, ended terribly, and don't hold up for a rewatch.

    Do you have a plan? Something better than the Cylons because they said they had a plan and most certainly didn't.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  9. Video game? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will there be a video game?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of all the things that have to be done to make a good movie (Script, acting, cinematography...), when it comes to Science Fiction, probably the most important is creating a consistent universe. How did you go about trying to do that - did you consciously set down an write a "Bible" or did you just wing it?

  11. Submitting ideas by LongearedBat · · Score: 2

    Will there be a way to volunteer new ideas? For example... new alien species, planets, technologies, etc.

    There might be some great new concepts "out there" by people who are not involved with the movie industry.

  12. Will there be auditions? by WSOGMM · · Score: 2

    If one were interested in acting on the show, how could he or she get involved?

  13. Will it follow recent trends? by hort_wort · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've noticed that scifi shows these days tends to come in two categories: those that make fun of themselves to be funny and those that try to be realistic by being dark and miserable. Will Space Command conform to these recent trends? Or will we finally see a return to a plot that doesn't toy with the viewers emotions?

    1. Re:Will it follow recent trends? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd like to see a show that's a lot like Star Trek: TNG, showing a future where humans have a healthy, strong society, everyone does what they're supposed to most of the time, people aren't all a bunch of greedy selfish fucks, and they spend their time exploring the unknown and making contact with interesting civilizations.

      Yes, I know it's completely unrealistic and totally contrary to human nature, and that "Hunger Games" is far more realistic, but it's fun to watch and fantasize about instead of everything being dark and miserable all the time.

  14. Could fans support their favourite shows? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In your case you put together a proposal for a film and found the funding for it, but do you think this sort of technique could be used to fund existing franchises that are in danger of being cancelled? Personally I would love to have been able to fund another series or movie of Stargate Universe. Would it be best for the fans to start such an effort, or should it come from the producers of the show? It might be a hard sell if the fans were just asking for another series without any hint of what it might contain, which could only come from the producers.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. What themes will be dealt with? by briester · · Score: 2

    What is the premise of your story? What universal human themes will you deal with? What questions are you asking about life, the universe, and everything? And how is the setting 'in spaaaace!' going to help you ask these questions? I've read that some notable sci-fi writers are providing inspiration for the show, so I'd love to hear what sort of message your show will ultimately turn that inspiration into.

  16. What Science Fiction or Fantasy are you reading? by Cragen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is reading SFF is a factor in the SFF Movie Industry producers such as yourselves? If so, what Science Fiction or Fantasy are you reading right now? Or What has been, so far, your favorite SFF book? And (Or) who is your favorite SFF author? Thanks for the great memories of watching your stuff the first time.