Slashdot Mirror
OpenRelief Project Launches Disaster Drone Project at LinuxCon Japan
An anonymous reader writes "We'll never forget last year's LinuxCon Japan conference, which took place shortly after the devastating Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in March. As the country still reeled from the disaster, LinuxCon presenters discussed how open source software could contribute to disaster relief. One year later, a team of developers has returned to LinuxCon in Yokohama this week to announce OpenRelief, a new project aimed at building a low-cost, remote-controlled robotic plane to report damage in hard-to-reach, disaster stricken areas."
They're spending $28,000,000 to do the same thing.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57449783-76/u.s-navy-turns-to-linux-to-run-its-drone-fleet/
"I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
The difference is paying for something that will probably work most of the time with a bit of fiddling occasionally, and something that can be put in a crate, bounced around on rough seas in wildly varying temperatures for a few months/years, then be pulled out by someone with a small pamphlet of basic instructions and still work.
There are disaster and emergency response groups all over the world that could easily afford something like this. There are also individuals that buy equipment that is far more expensive than this to support disaster relief efforts. I am aware of a number of Ham Radio organizations that have built custom trucks or RV's just for use in emergency communications. In my state, there is a project underway to equip hospitals in the state with on site ham radio equipment and with assigned and trained operators that live close by so that communications can be maintained between them and other emergency services to when needed.
First of all, OpenRelief is a design project where people donate their time, experience and money to help create open disaster relief solutions, and we make our designs available to everyone for free. We do this to try and solve serious problems with gathering information in disaster situations. The reasons vary between the project contributors, but they are all pretty clear cut. For example, I was involved in the Japanese disaster relief effort last year, and the problems encountered there directly motivated me to work with Karl Lattimer to create OpenRelief.
Second of all, the 1,000 USD cost refers to the expected cost to source and build the drones around the world. In other words, it is the target Bill of Materials for retail purchasing of the various technologies needed to assemble the drone. For obvious reasons that does not involve taking a "100 RC plane, sticking about 150$ worth of hardware in it" and hoping for the best. Perhaps it would be informative to take a moment and price the retail Ardupilot with airspeed sensor from Udrones, which is currently 324.95 USD plus shipping. The OpenRelief plane also requires good optics, good servos, motor, battery and a computer. As another commentator said, this is about balancing cost and reliability, with the requirement that this equipment can be built or shipped anywhere in the world and provide utility for a reasonable time.
While it is easy to make vague comments based on opinion, there is a significant gap between that and actually building, testing and refining a solutions with a specific use-case in mind. To avoid waste, it would be more useful if energy instead went towards increasing functionality and lowers costs in projects like OpenRelief, so that better solutions can be created and shared with others.
It's a good question. OpenRelief is designing and testing technology to create a really good airframe solution with broad capabilities. It will be pretty cheap for anyone to source components at retail for around 1,000 USD and build their own unit. If a company decides to start production, it can set up a channel and build the technology at a much lower price due to supply chain savings. We are happy to have both types of stakeholder in our community.
While OpenRelief is focused on disaster relief, you can also use the robot plane platform for other things. As one other poster mentioned, it can work for scouting roads ahead for sports or similar, and it can make a great test-bed for your own UAV development.
Hi all, and thanks for reading about OpenRelief. We are now in a six-month cycle of testing and improving the robot plane and related sensors, and aim to have a durable set of solutions published as schematics and code by December. The idea is to allow anyone, anywhere to make OpenRelief solutions using readily available technology.
I thought it might be useful to share a little more information with you via this page. With that in mind please find some overview information below.
A video overview of OpenRelief and the robot plane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZROTYm17_Uc
An interview with a deep-dive into why OpenRelief was established and where it is going:
http://www.designspark.com/content/openrelief-clearing-fog-disaster
A copy of the slides we just presented at LinuxCon Japan to launch the project (warning: PDF):
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/images/stories/pdf/lcjp2012_coughlan.pdf
Regards
Shane
Co-Founder, OpenRelief