Slashdot Mirror


ICANN Reveals New TLD Application List

Eighteen months after first announcing expansion of the TLD space, ICANN has published the list of new gTLDs that have been applied for. A cursory glance reveals that.app was pretty popular, with 13 applications. Now begins the seven month objection period (but you have to be a large organization to lodge any). angry tapir writes in with info on how duplicate applications will be resolved. From the article: "The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has released statistics about the applications for new top-level domains — so-called 'dot word' domains along the lines of .web and .bank ... Two hundred and thirty of the domains proposed by applicants will become the subject of ICANN's dispute resolution process — which involves an attempt among applicants for the same domain to come to a joint arrangement, followed by an auction if that's unsuccessful. There were 751 conflicting applications for domains in total, which in many cases are likely to involve generic suffixes like .secure."

30 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. So, remind me again, by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who exactly benefits from this other than ICANN and the registrars? Because I'm fairly sure it isn't the public in general.

    1. Re:So, remind me again, by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      Companies. Now instead of www.companyname.com being the first site people try, they'll try a new standard like www.companyname or home.companyname. I wouldn't be too surprised if just .companyname came into common use.

    2. Re:So, remind me again, by grommit · · Score: 4, Funny

      So we're back to AOL keywords is it?

    3. Re:So, remind me again, by vlm · · Score: 2

      No one, because the new TLD names almost all suck and are for PR firms and megacorps.

      I don't want to see .yoga I want a .yogapants TLD. Where's .chan? Where's .pr0n?

      I am happy to see .WTF made it so far. I skimmed thru the list and thats the only new TLD that has any appeal for me, as either a buyer or a visitor.

      I was kinda surprised to see .dodge as in the car marketing brand, but not the discontinued brand names like .oldsmobile or .saturn.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:So, remind me again, by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If no one can remember what a companies TLD is, it will just drive more traffic to Google, as the masses will just search for the company name, then click the first link that pops up.

      Maybe this is a conspiracy to increase ad revenue for search giants. . . . . .

    5. Re:So, remind me again, by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      And thus the people are saved from the finger-aching pain inflicted by four extra keystrokes! But you also lose the classifications. Taking a very classic example, does 'wwf' take you to wrestling or pandas? It was bad enough when one fit in .com and the other in .org.

    6. Re:So, remind me again, by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Considering WWF rebranded to WWE about 7 years ago, I don't think that will be a problem. Although panda wrestling would be awesome.

    7. Re:So, remind me again, by residieu · · Score: 2

      How is that different from nobody being able to remember what they chose as their .com domain name? (Are they mycompany.com, my-company.com, or mc.com)?

    8. Re:So, remind me again, by iniquitous · · Score: 2

      We were already there. Doesn't "visit us on Facebook" sound a lot like "AOL keyword xyz?"

    9. Re:So, remind me again, by bfree · · Score: 3, Funny

      .bingo.
      .bet .you .one .is .able .to .talk .in .top .domain, .ie .fun .gift .to .us .now .new .games .to .play .by .email .fishing .fans .eh?

      .im .able .to .do .it. .fun .new .world, .net .is .now .bananarepublic.

      .so .if .an .art .fan .gifts .me .digital .video .camera .and .sexy .pro .star .rental .to .suck .off .and .stroke .my .wang, .im .hosting .one .diy .bj .porn .movie .free .at .cheap .pub .site. .ooo

      .ps .you .fail .and .gold .star .to .me .and .im .no .virgin .lol

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  2. Interesting by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Three entities want .sucks, four want .soccer, six want .law, five want .group, but only two want .sex

    1. Re:Interesting by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... only two want .sex

      I hope that they can come to some arrangement

  3. TLD Squatters? by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One name keeps appearing as the primary contact (but with different emails)

    Daniel Schindler

    TLD Squatters are born perhaps?

    It is also interesting that the like of Apple, IBM, Oracle and Microsoft all applied for their TLD's but HP didn't.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    1. Re:TLD Squatters? by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      He was prepared and thus registered for everything on Schindler's List...

    2. Re:TLD Squatters? by ardyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From what I understand the application fee is 6 figures, I can't imagine anyone can afford to TLD squat. He's probably an attorney who specializes in this kind of bureaucratic paperwork and has lots of different clients who want TLDs.

    3. Re:TLD Squatters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope - he is a squatter for a new squatting company called Donuts!
      http://icannwiki.com/index.php/Daniel_Schindler
      http://icannwiki.com/index.php/Donuts

    4. Re:TLD Squatters? by Necroman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or you go to the website of the email address: http://donuts.co/

      From their Team page:

      Dan Schindler
      Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing

      From their about us page:

      Donuts is a domain name registry bringing variety and choice to Internet naming.

      The company was founded by long-standing industry executives with experience in registry and registrar operations and industry regulation, and who have successfully launched top-level domains (TLDs), built industry-leading companies, and brought value and choice to the domain name marketplace.

      Donuts has applied for more than 300 TLDs and intends to secure and operate each. The company is well-resourced by substantial funding from multi-billion dollar private equity and venture capital funds.

      Looking at their investors, they have a lot of VC money. Looks like a startup trying to cash in on this. Though, it could be looked at in another light, that they are trying to provide a multitude of TLDs for people to use.

      A news story about the company: http://www.geekwire.com/2012/seattle-area-startup-raised-100m-series-financing/
      They have $100 million in funding.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    5. Re:TLD Squatters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're kidding, right? Seriously though, .hp is two letters, something not allowed in this gTLD land rush. I believe .hp is reserved for ccTLD. Maybe Hewlett Packistania perhaps?

      This land rush seems stupid. As others have pointed out, will people really be searching these new gTLDs as opposed to just using a normal web search? Although, I would welcome region specific TLDs, like .seattle, .nyc, etc., because I don't see those as much different than being country based, provided we restricted registrations to those with addresses in the locale.

    6. Re:TLD Squatters? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      Nice. Investment capital into the TLD land grab. This can't go wrong.

    7. Re:TLD Squatters? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it make more sense to use .seattle.wa.us and .newyorkcity.ny.us with an equivalent alias of .nyc.ny.us? It would save me a lot of time when I'm looking for the right Springfield if I knew that .springfield.ma.us was nearly guaranteed to point to the Springfield that houses the Basketball Hall of Fame.

  4. Re:Useful change by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering that many users still put "www.apple.com" in the Google search box rather than the address bar, then choose Apple from the list of results.... I don't think it will be a problem. Besides, with people visiting sites with foreign TLDs, such as .ca, .au, .pl, .ru, .cn - I don't think they'll be too overwhelmed with choices other than .com, .net and .org.

  5. Re:Useful change by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also how many client/server scripts will break when the new TLDs arrive?

    Probably the unicode TLDs will be a larger challenge than .app

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. kanji tattoos and domain names by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kids who are just a little younger than me have the consensus view that rebellion means anyone under the age of 20 when the fast and the furious came out should get kanji tattoos. This leads to hilarious blogs like the hanzismatter where gullible buffoons get random asian style tats that mean nothing at all, or have something truly embarrassing like it means small wiener when translated. Of course the concept is pretty moronic in general, makes me want to move to China and start inking gullible buffoons with english words like "goatse.cx" and telling the morons it means "strong" in english.

    Anyway the point of this ramble is I can see some of the UTF-8 kanji TLDs being popular for vanity email addresses among the kanji tats crowd. After all, its kanji, it must be cool, right? Also I think it would be hilarious to go thru life in the US when people ask me for my email address I can tell them vlm at-sign "draw them a kanji". This might cut down on spam too. In fact I think it would be doubly awesome if I could intentionally get a kanji TLD that means "goatse", or maybe some random swear word.

    (Another fun thing will be watching the love I'm about to receive in about 10 seconds from /.ers with kanji tats)

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:kanji tattoos and domain names by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      This might cut down on spam too.

      I find the opposite more likely. Anyone in the Western world who you tell your e-mail address to will likely have difficulty reproducing it, whereas any spambot that manages to get hold of it will have no issues whatsoever copying it into their database of addresses to contact.

  7. Re:Charleston Road Registry Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are all for Google. Look at the email addresses.

  8. No .linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone get on that quick!

    1. Re:No .linux? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      Shhh. Either Microsoft will buy it or hundreds of different linux distros will have a cage match over how it works...

  9. Does Anyone Actually Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone actually care about these new TLDs? Sure, I get that a few registrars anticipate making some money form them by selling ancillary registrations to people defending their names and trademarks for $5 a piece. But, do we really care about it? Do we really want MyName.Whatever?

    To me, like .xxx a .secure or .mobile or even .google is meaningless. They are just longer to type and easier to forget than .com .net.org. Look at the ones we already have like .biz and .info that no one cares about and no one, besides spammers, actually use.

  10. The most contested TLDs were: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    APP 13 applications
    HOME 11
    INC 11
    ART 10
    SHOP 9
    LLC 9
    BOOK 9
    BLOG 9
    MUSIC 8
    MOVIE 8
    DESIGN 8

    Some big TLD squatter activity from:
    donuts.co - 307 TLDs
    famousfourmedia.com - 60 TLDs

    Google wants 93 TLDs (including some legit trademarks)

  11. What a joke by pongo000 · · Score: 2

    You gotta love the crassness that ICANN displays when it comes to objections. Not only are you limited to the grounds upon which you object, but "you must pay a filing fee in the amount set and published by the relevant dispute resolution service provider at the time you file your objection." So IOW, if you can't afford to object (to the tune of USD6200 or more), you're shit out of luck.

    For all that's holy, support the alt-roots movement before the Internet is completely consumed by commercial interests.