Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Refusing To Comply With Piracy Subpoenas

New submitter nbacon writes with news that Comcast, apparently tired of the endless BitTorrent-related piracy lawsuits, has stopped complying with subpoena requests, much to the chagrin of rightsholders. From the article: "Initially Comcast complied with these subpoenas, but an ongoing battle in the Illinois District Court shows that the company changed its tune recently. Instead of handing over subscriber info, Comcast asked the court to quash the subpoenas. Among other things, the ISP argued that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over all defendants, because many don’t live in the district in which they are being sued. The company also argues that the copyright holders have no grounds to join this many defendants in one lawsuit. The real kicker, however, comes with the third argument. Here, Comcast accuses the copyright holders of a copyright shakedown, exploiting the court to coerce defendants into paying settlements."

4 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The Twilight Zone by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well it takes lawyers to say NO too. And they don't work for free.

    The best they can hope for is to establish a precedent and make the nuisance subpoenas reduce in scope.
    Fighting a validly issued subpoena is a costly legal move. A minimum wage clerk can knock out a hundred
    replies to these in half an hour with automated tools. That would be the cheap approach.

    So there is some financial outlay involved with this approach, and the return on that investment is
    probably questionable and short lived, and may blow back in their face if they lose safe harbor
    protection by fighting these subpoenas.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. The real reason is money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A few Subpeona's here and there are fine, sure they cost you, but it's a cost of doing business.

    That's that right up until some company wants to subpeona 4,000 of your users, per week.

    And the thing is these subpeona's, they aren't for john doe at 127.0.0.1 on 6/15/2010, they're for MAC addresses, traffic usage reports, etc and the requestor gets NASTY if they don't get what they want.

    Either you spend an ungodly amount of cash complying, or you go the cheaper route; get the lawyers to tell them to go pound sand.

  3. Re:Yay Comcast. by Jeng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are looking at it the wrong way.

    This is Comcast not complying, that is their standard operating procedure. If they can find a way to not do something, they will not do that thing.

    The fact that this actually helps their customers is purely unintentional.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  4. Re:Yay Comcast. by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's simple math. The more money Comcast's customers shell out to copyright trolls, the less money they have to shovel into Comcast's coffers.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!