Slashdot Mirror


It's Baaack! XB-37B Finally Lands

ColdWetDog writes "The US Air Force / DARPA 'baby shuttle,' the Boeing-built XB-37B has just landed after 469 days in orbit. No official explanation of why controllers kept the mission going past the original duration of 270 days other than 'because we could.' I, for one, welcome our long duration, unmanned orbital overlords."

11 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Possibly they wanted to observe the Chinese launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Possibly they wanted to observe the Chinese space launch. It would provide a good evaluation of what Chinese missiles can do.

  2. Re:Possibly they wanted to observe the Chinese lau by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, they brought it down because the Chinese thought they might swing by to look at the XB-37B while they were up there.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. man in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    uhh, you do realize that unmanned generally means that it doesn't havel ife support systems. We can get shit to the space station; we demonstrated that with the dragon capsule. However, we still don't have a way to get a man in space.

    1. Re:man in space? by million_monkeys · · Score: 5, Funny

      uhh, you do realize that unmanned generally means that it doesn't havel ife support systems. We can get shit to the space station; we demonstrated that with the dragon capsule. However, we still don't have a way to get a man in space.

      We could cryogenically freeze the astronauts and send them up as popsicles. Then, once we invent equipment to defreeze them, we can send that up and thaw them out. Problem solved. With enough creativity, nearly anything is possible.

  4. The future of spaceflight is robotic by warewolfsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets face it, it's just too expensive to keep puny humans alive in orbit, the advent of highly advanced space faring robotics will see the end of long endurance human spaceflight.

    1. Re:The future of spaceflight is robotic by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lets face it, it's just too expensive to keep puny humans alive in orbit, the advent of highly advanced space faring robotics will see the end of long endurance human spaceflight.

      20 years ago, I was all rah-rah for human spaceflight. Then I started reading more speculations of technological singularities and the integration of man and machine. I now see two futures as much more likely than manned spaceflight with life support systems as traditionally conceived.

      If wacky AI prophets like Kurzweil are right, the human race that expands to the stars and robotic unmanned exploration might be one and the same. If humans transcend biology, there is no longer a need for packing oxygen, radiation shielding and water into a spacecraft.

      Another possibility, proposed by Vernor Vinge in Marooned in Realtime is that an intelligent race like ours might simply move into a virtual reality, populating and exploring that inner world of infinite possibilities instead of the cold, hard reality of outer space. Yeah, yeah, there's the possibilities of a catastrophic asteroid strike etc., but the human face is not especially adept at planning for the very longterm future, and simply moving towards the core of the planet might prove an attractive solution for the shorter term.

      Incidentally, the AC who also responded to you is a well-known troll (easily distinguished by his use of the term "space nutter"). While I agree with him that manned space exploration is not a likely future, his purpose here is more to mock and tear down than to contribute to meaningful discussion. Avoid his trap.

    2. Re:The future of spaceflight is robotic by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've always boldly gone where no one has gone before, for drugs, for food, for fun, for profit. We're not likely to stop. We'll try not to warp on your lawn, though.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  5. Re:But the US can't get into space?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Allow me to assure you that the United States military does not have any manned spaceflight capability. At all. Whatsoever. Period. The end. So you'll stop asking about it if you know what's good for you. In addition rumors of a secret base in the asteroid belt are simply that. Wild, baseless rumors. Nothing to see here citizen. Move along.

  6. Esxplanation by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    "No official explanation of why controllers kept the mission going past the original duration of 270 days"

    No official explanation, but anonymous sources on the inside report that spacecraft's internal clock was off by 199 days. Aliens could not have been reached for comments.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  7. Re:Possibly they wanted to observe the Chinese lau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should start a kickstarter to bribe the chinese to plant a chinese flag where ours was, just so congress will get all fired up and get our space program going again.

  8. Re:Possibly they wanted to observe the Chinese lau by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No quite, it actually moves the earth with special space warping technology. If that's not true, why hasn't the Air Force denied it?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109