Slashdot Mirror


China Completes Its First Manned Space Docking

This AP story, as carried by the Houston Chronicle, says that the Chinese Shenzhou 9 spacecraft (carrying a crew that includes the country's first female astronaut) has successfully docked with an orbiting module, a first for China's manned space program. However, manned mission or not, the actual docking was actually executed from below: as with previous docking maneuvers, "Monday's docking also was completed by remote control from a ground base in China. A manual docking, to carried out by one of the crew members, is scheduled for later in the mission. Two crew members plan to conduct medical tests and experiments inside the module, while the third will remain in the spacecraft."

39 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Awww good on em by spokenoise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now everyone will want to do it

  2. Significant Milestone by mister2au · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slow but steady progress since initiating this program in 1992.

    With a first Chinese moonwalk estimated for 2024 that is 32 years total (with already 50 years of rocket research in the world to leverage off) ... makes you understand just much the US threw at its lunar programme to manage going from the start of the Mercury program to moonwalk in less than 11 years

    1. Re:Significant Milestone by EdgePenguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or, to put it another way, how little the Chinese are investing. The space program is clearly not viewed as a high economic priority in China. The period between their first manned flight and now is roughly the same as the period between the first US manned flight and first US lunar landing; and in that time period China has had an economy far in excess of that of the US in the 1960s. They have also had lower costs due to the fact that they don't have to develop all the technology from scratch. They could easily have done a repeat of Apollo on this time scale, but chose not to.

    2. Re:Significant Milestone by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe they just don't want to rush it and take chances. In the 1960s the US and the USSR were competing to be the first to space and the first to the moon. The Chinese are going to be the third country to reach the moon (second, for manned missions since the Russians didn't bother) whichever way you slice it.

      There's no point going at it in a hurry and risking the lives of astronauts any more than they have to. Back when the Apollo missions were flying, the US and the USSR had an attitude of "get someone up there and maybe back down if they survive, and get it done now". The Chinese don't need to do that.

    3. Re:Significant Milestone by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "... economy far in excess... "

      is only a relative figure. Per capita (which along with total economy MUST be included), their economy was nowhere near the U.S. during that time, as measured in U.S. dollars. The total "GDP" (if there is such a think in a socialist country -- definitions must be clarified) might have been greater, but it was for a far larger population.

      The fact is that during most of that period, China could not even feed itself, "large" economy or not.

    4. Re:Significant Milestone by mister2au · · Score: 5, Informative

      Technically not third to reach the moon
      - Japan put up an orbiter (Hiten) in 1993
      - ESA put up SMART-1 in 2003
      - India crashed their Chandrayaan probe (deliberately an impact mission) a few years ago

      And even then, both India and the Europeans are targeting manned landings before China.

      Although even Iran has announced for 2025 so clearly some of these need to be taken with some skepticism

    5. Re:Significant Milestone by k(wi)r(kipedia) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the total size of the economy is more important in attempting to measure a country's ability to maintain a national space program. Otherwise some small but rich European or oil-producing country would have also launched humans into space a long time ago. The Soviet Union was clearly poorer than the US in per capita terms, but managed to beat the US to several early space milestones.

    6. Re:Significant Milestone by abelb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't forget that China has successfully completed two orbital lunar missions with Chang'e 1 and 2.

    7. Re:Significant Milestone by Teancum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My largest complaint about the Chinese space program is the lack of operational tempo. Simply put, they aren't really in the habit of sending stuff into space and they are waiting too long between flights if they want to gain institutional knowledge about how to perform tasks in space. The last previous flight for Chinese astronauts was in 2008, although there was an "unmanned" spaceflight last year which acted as a dress rehearsal for this flight.

      All this said, I will admit that this is a significant accomplishment and something which speaks volumes about the technical accomplishments of China. The organizations which have been able to achieve this milestone are rather small, and for manned spaceflight is only NASA, Roscosmos, and now CNSA (Chinese National Space Agency), with just JAXA, ESA, and SpaceX as the only other organizations to perform this task using unmanned spacecraft.

      Still, all China has done so far is more or less replicate Gemini 8, avoiding the problems that nearly killed Neil Armstrong and David Scott. They have a long way to go if they want to turn this into any sort of useful experience to get them anywhere else, but they can start to have their astronauts do stuff more elaborate than simply being potty-trained monkeys who know how to wave flags. A huge difference between Gemini 8 and Shenzhou 9 is that Armstrong and Scott were actually piloting their spacecraft where instead the pilots of the Shenzhou spacecraft are sitting at mission control.

    8. Re:Significant Milestone by Xiaran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Iran is going to go up there and knock over the American flag.

    9. Re:Significant Milestone by Teancum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the total size of the economy is more important in attempting to measure a country's ability to maintain a national space program. Otherwise some small but rich European or oil-producing country would have also launched humans into space a long time ago. The Soviet Union was clearly poorer than the US in per capita terms, but managed to beat the US to several early space milestones.

      I suppose that is where these crazy nerds come along and try to prove your notion could work all along. I'll admit their goal is more to duplicate Alan Shepard's flight rather than John Glenn's, but it is none the less showing that more countries and people are coming together and trying to get into space.

      Russia might get a little nervous if Denmark starts to attempt orbital spaceflight though. These guys are using a launch site in the Baltic Sea, and extra nerd points are earned because the "ground crew" for the launch site works out of a submarine on launch day.

    10. Re:Significant Milestone by f3rret · · Score: 3, Funny

      (if there is such a think in a socialist country -- definitions must be clarified)

      I live in a socialist country and I think we have a GDP here.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    11. Re:Significant Milestone by jpapon · · Score: 2

      The total "GDP" (if there is such a think in a socialist country -- definitions must be clarified)

      Haha, you must be a Foxnews viewer (or maybe even editor)? Why would a socialist country not have a GDP??? Do they not produce things of value? Do they not trade with other countries?

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    12. Re:Significant Milestone by Teancum · · Score: 4, Informative

      A huge difference between Gemini 8 and Shenzhou 9 is that Armstrong and Scott were actually piloting their spacecraft where instead the pilots of the Shenzhou spacecraft are sitting at mission control.

      I am fairly certain that if remote control technology has been sophisticated enough at the time, then NASA would also have done it by remote control.

      Not really. This is basically a difference in attitude towards those who are inside of the spacecraft, where an American philosophy is that those inside of the spacecraft ought to be much more directly in charge of what is going on, while the Chinese/Soviet philosophy was one of paranoia that the spaceflight participants might do something politically embarrassing so that authority was taken away.

      The original plan for the Mercury spaceflights was to be largely automated, with the astronauts being largely "spam in a can" and really not doing anything other than being a passenger and enjoying the ride. Considering the Mercury astronauts were all test pilot instructors (qualified not just as test pilots but to teach people how to become those as well), there was a minor revolt within the astronaut corps that insisted some level of actual piloting should take place inside of the spacecraft, where key decisions about the progress of the spacecraft such as abort decisions and proceeding through various milestones rested upon the mission commander... in some cases with the mission commander alone.

      Note also that much of the early NASA technology for launching astronauts into space came from the ICBM missile development, where significant automation already took place. The first spaceflights for the Mercury program used Chimpanzees, who obviously weren't rated as pilots or expected to do much other than take in the ride.

      I'll note that the attitude of allowing manual control has made a difference in several missions and allowed a successful conclusion to those missions that otherwise might have gone badly. Gemini 8 was one of those situations BTW, where the astronauts weren't able to explain their situation to ground control due to a loss of telemetry and garbled communications until after they had finally resolved the situation. Another was the ability of the astronauts to rework Apollo 13 in order to get them to come home. I'm sure other situations could be brought up where real piloting skill was applied, including John Glenn's decision to not jettison his retro-rockets on the Friendship 7 flight. John Glenn also switched to a manual flight mode due to problems he noticed during the flight, not trusting the automated system that was in place.

    13. Re:Significant Milestone by crazyjj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The space program is clearly not viewed as a high economic priority in China.

      That's because China isn't in a space race with anyone. This is just their way of saying "We've arrived." There is no particular hurry and no pissing contest to win here, especially with the U.S. bowing out of the whole manned spaceflight game.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    14. Re:Significant Milestone by tp1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > And they stole all our rocket secrets in the 90's.

      Says an American - from a country whose most used rocket is running on a Russian RD-180 engine.

    15. Re:Significant Milestone by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      It's cultural. There is simply too much at stake, and the pilots (err...passengers) are too low-ranking to make such huge decisions. If there is an Apollo 13-like incident, then careers will crash and burn, there will be a huge investigation, and the big bosses will likely end up in prison for stealing funds from the operation. The astronauts are just placeholders.

      Anyone remember the names of China's first three astronauts? Me, either.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    16. Re:Significant Milestone by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Have you ever heard of 'The Right Stuff'?

      Pilot, not occupant
      Spacecraft, not capsule
      Window and Escape Hatch with explosive bolts, not 'spam in a can'

      --
      Good-bye
  3. Re:In Space... by yotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look... I apologize already for the insult, okay? But it isn't entirely undeserved.
    Making extensive use of, well, let's say "borrowed" technology -- not to mention the outright theft of some of it -- is hardly equivalent to doing this stuff on your own.
    If it's a success, I will be somewhat surprised, and not very inclined to credit them for it.

    I know. American scientists were able to get to the Moon without using any technology from any other cultures. Every other country should have to do the same. The Chinese shouldn't even be able to use those rockets we invented thousands of years ago.

    (For the sarcastically disabled, I know who invented the rocket)

  4. Sorry in advance... by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...carrying a crew that includes the country's first female astronaut... A manual docking, to carried out by one of the crew members, is scheduled... Two crew members plan to conduct medical tests and experiments...

    ...giggity.

    1. Re:Sorry in advance... by ongelovigehond · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't the "docking procedure" be done by two crew members ?

    2. Re:Sorry in advance... by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's the "Han Solo" method. Just a question of who shoots first.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  5. Re:"Medical experiments" by Quick+Reply · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exactly what I was going to post.

    In all fairness, it probably has already been done by the Americans and Russians, whether as a secret experiment or a "side experiment" done by the scientists themselves.

    I mean, how many people would go all the way to space and not do it given the chance, it would be like doubling what is already the most amazing experience of your life.

    I hope an adult entertainment company buys a couple of tickets on a private space flight, for the enjoyment of the rest of us who will never get the chance but are curious to see.

  6. Re:In Space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm... Well...

    You mean "borrowed" in the sense like the USA did when using the techniques developed in Nazi Germany?

    And why should you develop something yourself when the knowledge is available? Most techniques used by the NASA are not especially top-secret as far as I know. So - why spend an big budget on something that's freely available?

    I think there is a good chance the first man on Mars will be Chinese. Not because they are that good, but because they slowly bit steadily keep pushing forward, while the USA is stepping down. Anyway by the time of those first manned mars landing, I estimate the biggest budget in the USA will be spend on thousands of lawyers fighting the (around that time completely out-of-control) software patent wars (inside the USA, because outside the USA people are not that stupid).

  7. "They're starving in China" by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "They're starving back in China, so finish what you got." is a line from a John Lennon song, when I was a kid that's what mother's told their children when trying to persuade them to eat thier veggies. There were several famines due to Mao's "great leap" the worst of which was without doubt the worst in the 20th century (and perhaps of all time). I was too young to recall that one but I do recall the one in 1969 (the same year Armstrong set foot on the moon).

    It's said (by who I don't recall) that China has dragged more people out of poverty in the last 4 decades than the rest of the world combined by simply raising the standard of living for their own people. Having wittnessed (from afar) the scale of the change since the gang of four were booted out in the 70's, I'm inclined to believe that claim.

    Que paranoid rants about governments from 20-somethings with cheeto filled stomachs, in...3...2....1

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:"They're starving in China" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People complain about the UK giving aid to India which has its own space programme while millions live in terrible poverty, but the simple fact is they need one. Modern technology requires satellites, advanced materials and cutting edge research. They need it to bring the economies up to western levels and lift everyone out of poverty at once, rather than fire fighting individual disasters.

      It does suck that money spent putting a man in orbit is money that can't be spent educating poor kids, but you have to look at it as the individual need vs. the greater good and having a mix of both.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:"They're starving in China" by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "They're starving back in China, so finish what you got." is a line from a John Lennon song, when I was a kid that's what mother's told their children when trying to persuade them to eat thier veggies.

      Funny thing is that I saw an interview not long ago with a Chinese writer who said that when he was growing up in the 50's and 60's, the Chinese were told the same thing about the U.S. They were shown Depression-era footage of soup kitchen lines and told that was typical of life in the U.S. They would even encourage schoolchildren to give to charity to help out the starving Americans.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  8. Re:Face by _merlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She isn't hot by any standard of the word. Well, at least by classical Chinese measures of beauty she's quite ugly. And if the pictures are photoshopped, whoever did it should be sacked. I think it's you who's insecure, and you seem to have a bit of a case of yellow fever, too if you think she's hot.

  9. Re:In Space... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Making extensive use of, well, let's say "borrowed" technology

    Yes, China borrowed from the US space program, which borrowed from the German V2 program, which borrowed from fireworks, which were invented by guess who? That's how civilizations progress, a failure to comprehend that basic fact of life is a failure to comprehend all of human history.

    [I'm] not very inclined to credit them for it

    That's just sour grapes.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Re:In Space... by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Making extensive use of, well, let's say "borrowed" technology -- not to mention the outright theft of some of it -- is hardly equivalent to doing this stuff on your own.

    How dare you criticize the US Space Program like this. Admittedly the spoils of war go to the victor and the Nazi Germans can't really complain now about the "theft" of their technology by Americans and Russians now since they were overthrown, but still this is hardly the equivalent of doing stuff on your own. Oh wait - what?

    On a more serious note - most progress is nothing but a series of incremental improvements on existing technology. Unless you happen to be an expert on both the US and Chinese space programs and can show me exactly where China copied the US verbatim, the point you are trying to make is completely irrelevant. I'm sure the Chinese rockets are built the Chinese way - with engineering short cuts and differences that make them entirely different and worthy of credit.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. Re:China completes its first womanned space dockin by progician · · Score: 3, Informative

    No need for inventing new words: crewed.

  12. Re:Face by _merlin · · Score: 2

    Well if he meant "hottest" as in most competent, then what did photoshopping have to do with it, and how is it any different from what the US did with Sally Ride? I fail to see how what China is doing is any more of a dickwaving exercise than the US/Soviet space race. In fact, it's probably less of a dickwaving exercise since no matter how fast or slow they go, they aren't aiming for any firsts anyway.

  13. Re:In Space... by hakann · · Score: 5, Funny

    This explains it perfectly: http://www.xkcd.com/984/

  14. Well, congratulations by Guillaume+le+Btard · · Score: 2

    It is interesting the Chinese have managed this, though I am not sure how useful this will be. It might have been better to work together with the other parties on the international space station. I was actually suprised that it has taken so long to get the first female into space as China has a rather 50/50 division of the sexes in the engineering field. As a matter of fact, I work in a institute that is part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and I think that in my office there are more women than men as far as engineers are concerned.

  15. Re:"Medical experiments" by Teancum · · Score: 2

    The experiments that you are talking about were done in "simulated microgravity" using magnetic fields to try and neutralize gravitational influences and other techniques, and not actually flying to experiments in space. The sad fact is that in spite of the fact that there have been several mice sent into space including a couple long-term studies done on the ISS, procreation has not been one of the aspects studied nor has any multi-generational studies been done or even attempted in terms of what might happen in space among placental mammals.

    There was a pregnant rat which gave birth successfully to very healthy babies on board the Space Shuttle, but she conceived on the ground and that was a relatively short term study with that flight lasting only two weeks.

    I'm sure that a bunch of horny mice could likely figure out how to get their equipment to work in space. I'm just disappointed that nobody has bothered to let them try in the first place. Even worse, I think it will need to be human experiments that will be tried before somebody gets smart and thinks it should be something seriously investigated.

    In the end, the only thing you can really conclude is that nobody knows what will happen if you attempt to conceive a baby in space, and that anything you have read on the topic is pure conjecture and speculation not based upon any actual science on the topic. That is the reason some long term space mission planning such as sending people to Mars includes ideas like sterilization of the spaceflight participants, because of sheer ignorance about the topic and the mission planners simply don't want to even think about the potential of astronauts creating additional passengers that will show up on the manifest for the return flight.

  16. Re:In Space... by Teancum · · Score: 2

    You mean "borrowed" in the sense like the USA did when using the techniques developed in Nazi Germany?

    The US didn't just used techniques developed in Nazi Germany. They had Nazis from Nazi Germany built the rockets for them. Basically, americans just provided the money and sat back while the Nazis built their freedom rockets.

    This is so patently false that I simply must say you are full of it.

    Yes, there were many of the rocket engineers who worked on the V-2 rockets of Nazi Germany which were hired by the U.S. Army Ordinance Command at the conclusion of World War II (through something called Operational Paperclip). Their contribution and experience was vital for developing the early ICBMs and rockets that later were developed by NASA as well as the U.S. Air Force.

    All this said, it is ignoring the contribution and hard work by thousands of engineers and aerospace workers who helped to contribute to the development of American spaceflight. There is no way that the "Nazis" could have built all of this stuff without the insight and extremely hard work by ordinary Americans. Yes, they learned a whole lot from the German scientists, but this is gross oversimplification of what actually happened and is frankly insulting too.

  17. SPACE NAZIS MUST DIE! by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    > And they stole all our rocket secrets in the 90's.

    Says an American - from a country whose most used rocket is running on a Russian RD-180 engine.

    Ho Lee Crap, how off Earth did you miss the nearly automatic Goodwin play on that hand?!!!!
    Here, it's not hard :

    Says an American - from a country whose moon program was built by all the best repatriated NAZI rocket scientists.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  18. Re:In Space... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

    "Admittedly the spoils of war go to the victor and the Nazi Germans can't really complain now about the "theft" of their technology"

    Almost everybody who keeps mentioning "Nazi" technology here has missed a couple of very large points:

    (A) The V2 rocket was a failure. Yes, some of them hit England and caused havoc. But more than half of them didn't. Many exploded en route, and less than half actually hit near their targets.

    (B) We did not "steal" that Nazi technology, we bought it, after the war. Von Braun was in the U.S., and other German engineers were contracted. They were neither enslaved, or robbed.

    (C) The Germans got most of that technology from us in the first place. They made some improvements, but this is precisely the kind of "incremental improvement" you refer to.

    But having said that:

    "... most progress is nothing but a series of incremental improvements on existing technology."

    True. But manned space exploration was an exception. Most of the technology was invented wholesale, independently, in the U.S. and Soviet Union. (I'm not just talking rocket engines.) Other countries honestly didn't contribute much, until AFTER it was a done deal.

  19. Re:In Space... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So the same argument can be used for China then. They sent their kids over her to be educated and what do you know, they paid attention in class and the asian kid always got the good grades in Engineering and Physics and now they have their own universities and departments and can build their own stuff. They "bought" the technology too. Or is it just so easy to sneak into NASA and start copying everything verbatim? But wait, how would a spy in NASA explain the advances in Chinese heavy industry? Did the NASA spies also steal plans to build high speed railroads, like the ones in use all over the US? How about the Chinese semiconductor industry? Did they get that from NASA too? Or are you trying to say there are Chinese spies everywhere?

    Or maybe, just maybe, the Chinese aren't as dumb as you think they are by refusing to give them any credit. After all it's much easier to throw R&D dollars towards something you already know is possible especially when those R&D dollars go much further thanks to wage differences and (lack of) environmental laws. And when you have an economy the size of China's, growing at the rate which China's is, you have plenty of money to spend.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.