Slashdot Mirror


The $45 Windows Laptop

YokimaSun writes "The search for a cheap laptop has brought us news from India of a $10 laptop (which later turned out to be a hundred dollars). Today PC Gaming News has details of a laptop which is selling for a measly 45 dollars, what do you get for that, you get a netbook running windows embedded compact 7, 128 megs of ram, a via8505 processor and a 7 inch screen capable of 800x480 pixels resolution." I'm still waiting for my under $50 Macbook.

9 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lol... by hobarrera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you're just trolling. Why would you need more than 128MB to connect to a VM, that'd be a simple dumb terminal... I'm pretty sure dumb terminals at that resolution can run just fine with those specs.

  2. Could be an intersting device. by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting, and inbelievably cheap - not just becasue of the Windows license fee; no idea how much they pay for that. It's Windows CE so linking to the normal Win7 retail prices doesn't make sense.

    OS: Windows CE. Never worked with that, no idea on the interface. Should include a browser, assume IE. But what version for WinCE?

    Storage: not mentioned. Is this a "true" netbook as in can only do web browsing and web apps? Price could imply no local storage indeed, other than for the embedded OS. The ebay listing has no details at all. They are selling, shipping US only.

    Install other OS? Well if no external storage, good luck with that.

    Install applications? No mention about this. No external storage could be an issue there.

    Form factor looks like the EEEPC 701 series, that's not too bad. It has a higher screen resolution. I like the overall idea. I'm still regularly using that EEEPC, almost exclusively for web browsing. It's sitting on the dining table, quick to grab, small enough to not be in the way too much, light enough to move around with one hand.

  3. Can't wait to see so-called "gamers" buy this by GerbilSoft · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the article:

    Powered by a Pentium processor

    Processsor Type: VIA 8505

    Not only did they get the company wrong, it's not even x86 architecture. VIA 8505 is ARM-based. This isn't even including the fact that it runs Windows CE (aka Windows Embedded Compact), so standard Win32 programs wouldn't run on it, even if compiled for ARM.

  4. Re:Battery by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why cant they skimp more and make it a feature. use 6 AA batteries. LET the buyer go out and get his own batteries. That way it adds a significant amount of useful to the thing. Plus all the survivalist nuts would be all over it.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Re:"I'm still waiting for my under $50 Macbook." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I would submit that the backlit keyboard and absolutely wonderful mac trackpad are worth the difference in price alone. Windows peeps have no concept of how nice a GOOD trackpad is.

  6. Re:$1200 is not a good price by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See the problem is that Apple doesn't make a Mac for your needs and specs and price. They do sell millions to customers each quarter that fulfills their needs as some people want an Ultrabook. I would venture to say that few of them judge you while you judge them.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  7. Re:$1200 is not a good price by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "They do sell millions to customers each quarter that fulfills their needs as some people want an Ultrabook"

    Of course some people want them - the same way some people want a pair of Jimmy Choos when a $50 pair of shoes would do the same job. Its a fashion item for rich fashion victims. Most people who buy an ultrabook probably couldn't even spell ethernet port much less tell you what one is. But its sooo shiny and sleak and preeeetty .... *drool*

    "I would venture to say that few of them judge you while you judge them."

    Oh I feel so guilty judging people on a forum. Whatever next, subjective opinions?

    I know a bunch of people that has these, all of which can deal with networks fairly well (including one who wrote one of the first major books on IPv6, almost a decade ago.)

    They've got different priorities than you and me, but they clearly know what they are getting and do a conscious choice around it. My laptops are a MacBook Pro for work and a Lenovo for home use; I prefer the increased memory and screen size on the MacBook Pro compared to the easier-to-carry form factor of the ultralights. I'll probably switch from the Lenovo to a Mac Book Pro for my next home machine; the ergonomics of the hardware on the Lenovo is a bit clunky compared to the MacBook Pro. For what I need, I'm probably going to install Unix (FreeBSD or Linux) on it and be paying an extra $1000 or so primarily for a better trackpad and an easier to connect/disconnect power supply chord - and that is worth it to me. (I'm happy that it looks a less clunky as well, but that's not something I'd pay extra for, or I'd not have gotten the Lenovo in the first place.)

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  8. Re:"I'm still waiting for my under $50 Macbook." by ABCC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's easy, just start selecting some extra options such as more RAM or an ssd drive. Admittedly the other manufactures also have a high markup on such upgrades but it's much easier to upgrade these parts yourself. Apple do their best to go against this with helpful features such as hard to open cases, oddly sized storage mounts and glued in memory.

    If you choose the cheapest RAM / storage options on a "pc laptop" and buy upgrades elsewhere you not only save a few hundred bucks on manufacturers price but also have a spare drive for backups/whatever and an extra RAM stick to flog on ebay. Given Apple's price markup on upgrades the savings will be even greater for similar specs.

    As for the GPs comparison of a 13" XPS vs the MacBook Air, Standard: given that the Air uses a low power Core variant the fact that it has a higher clock speed is meaningless. The XPS will be faster and costs 20% less than the Air.

  9. Re:"I'm still waiting for my under $50 Macbook." by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to agree with you until I started scrolling the page with the trackpad. Now I use that way more than I ever used the nub.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)