Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Firms Claims It Can Build World's Tallest Tower in 90 Days

An anonymous reader writes "Even since the current world's tallest builing — the Burj Khalifa in Dubai — was completed, there has been a constant battle to build the world's next tallest building. The current record holder stands tall at 828 meters and took five years to build, but a Chinese company called Broad Sustainable Building aims to smash that record by building the 838 meter Sky City tower, in Changsa, China in a mere 90 days. BSB plans to use prefab building techniques to construct the tower in record time."

48 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Just like their trains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absolutely nothing can go wrong....

    1. Re:Just like their trains... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
    2. Re:Just like their trains... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wonder who's now living in the identical buildings next to it.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Just like their trains... by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful
      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Just like their trains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Am I the only one feeling a bit uneasy about this thread? Some Chinese construction projects are underfunded and of poor quality, therefore all Chinese buildings are crap? Some Chinese products are rip-off of foreign products, therefore all Chinese tech is copied? All Chinamen talk funny therefore all Chinamen dumb?

      Maybe I'm just reading too much into it. In this specific case we simply don't know enough about it to come to any conclusion. Occasionally Boeing or Airbus aircraft crash due to shoddy constructing, faulty equipment (that they knew was faulty), improper maintenance due to the airline being cheap and so forth. In that case we look at the nature of the problem and decide if the entire fleet is at risk, and if not happily get on the next flight of an identical aircraft flying a near identical route. Blanket assumptions about all EU/US products do not follow.

    5. Re:Just like their trains... by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You sir are incredibly insightful. I researched this company and this topic. In the local paper they described how this company managed to build a 15 floor building in 15 days! Yes 15 days!

      The reason why this company can do what it can is because it builds these buildings using a pre-fab approach. North American's, and Europeans partially are not yet used to prefab houses. In Europe it is slowly trickling in, but nobody wants them to be built because they seriously undercut the housing lobby. Take for Ikea homes. Yes Ikea sells homes, using this method. They are cheaper than any other home. Look at this Ikea home for 86 K, which includes everything in the inside as well.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2108775/Ikea-launches-80-000-flat-pack-DIY-house.html

      It is hard to beat with all appliances and furniture of 86K. Now is it the final dream? No not really since Ikea is just partnering with a prefab company. BUT imagine if the Chinese managed to put it all together like this company. Then the west has serious issues!!!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    6. Re:Just like their trains... by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Am I the only one feeling a bit uneasy about this thread? Some Chinese construction projects are underfunded and of poor quality, therefore all Chinese buildings are crap? Some Chinese products are rip-off of foreign products, therefore all Chinese tech is copied? All Chinamen talk funny therefore all Chinamen dumb?

      That's not it at all... what's making people uneasy about this construction project is that we have a firm claiming they can do, in 90 days, what has traditionally taken many years. While I'm very willing to accept that they can find efficiencies in the process, it's a bit much.

    7. Re:Just like their trains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hi, Mainland Chinese person here.

      I lived a decade of my life in China, and go back there every few years. The real problem is that human life in China is not valued. Nobody feels responsible if a building falls over. It's bad if it gets international attention, not that lives were destroyed. People cut corners, bribe officials, anything to maximize profit.

    8. Re:Just like their trains... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Am I the only one feeling a bit uneasy about this thread? Some Chinese construction projects are underfunded and of poor quality, therefore all Chinese buildings are crap? Some Chinese products are rip-off of foreign products, therefore all Chinese tech is copied? All Chinamen talk funny therefore all Chinamen dumb?

      What concerns me is that an artificial deadline has been imposed for completing a very ambitious project. When a deadline is set, it creates, in many cases, a very strong tendency to meet the deadline, even if it means cutting corners. Combine that with a culture where face is very important and you have a potentially dangerous combination. Non of which is unique to China, universal for all of China; nor not prevalent in many other countries around the world.

      Or, as we used to put it when building industrial sites - "We offer good, fast, and cheap options. Pick the two you want."

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    9. Re:Just like their trains... by bLanark · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The real problem is that human life in China is not valued.

      This is true, the company I am working with were looking at data centers in mainland China, and asking about the fire supression system, in particular how long people had to get out once the alarm goes off. The answer was "In the Western world, you value human life over data, here we value data over human life."

      --
      Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
    10. Re:Just like their trains... by boristdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And whether or not you want (or are required to have) water, electricity, gas, and sewage disposal

      Yes, most people don't realize that about half of a building is site preparation. Putting in all the utilities and building a strong foundation is key.

      Of course, the Burj Khalifa doesn't even have this.
      http://boingboing.net/2011/11/08/what-happens-when-you-flush-a-toilet-in-the-worlds-tallest-building.html

    11. Re:Just like their trains... by whargoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      My boss would love it there.

    12. Re:Just like their trains... by catmistake · · Score: 5, Funny

      All Chinamen talk funny therefore all Chinamen dumb?

      What the fuck are you talking about? The chinaman is not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT... Also, Dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.

    13. Re:Just like their trains... by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I happen to be in structural engineering, and I have to say that you clearly don't know what you are talking about. I'll tell you why.

      Nowadays, and for a couple of decades now, there isn't a single european contractor who does not rely on prefabrication. Concrete structures tend to make this a bit harder to pull, but their building cost is so much lower than steel structures that the extra time spent on a project easily offsets costs. Even then, there are quite a number of prefab structural elements and modules, such as pre-slabs and composite slabs with profile steel sheeting, that help out a lot. With steel structures, even with composite slabs, it's quite easy to put up high numbers of floors in a limited number of days. The only limit that affects this is how fast you can hoist the beam and column elements, and how fast your crew is able to set the necessary connections.

      I suspect that in the US it's even more widespread. There are companies which even put together factories to assemble entire houses in assembly lines, and steel construction is much more widespread than concrete.

      So, your comment on the use of prefab techniques is obviously bullshit.

      Then, regarding your conspiracy theory, it is once again bullshit. To start off, as any product on earth, housing prices aren't defined by construction costs, but only on what clients are willing to spend on them. Meanwhile, construction costs, with today's technology, basically depends only on what finishings the client wishes. As a demonstration, you claimed that 86k is such a great deal. Yet, that's the price Ikea asks for a tiny apartment with an area of about 70mÂ. This represents a unit cost of about 1228â/mÂ, and this without accounting for the price of the property and any licenses and services which are needed to build it. Knowing this, do you actually know what's the average unit cost for building a similar house on a property, including the price of the property itself? Between 500â/m and 900â/mÂ.

      In other words, your example costs at least twice as much to build than a regular house.

      So, at least take your tinfoil hat off once in a while. The world isn't set out to get you.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    14. Re:Just like their trains... by Bigby · · Score: 3, Informative

      A 3000 sq ft home on a $40k lot costs about $200k-$250k to build in central Ohio. I don't know where your numbers are coming from...

      And to the GGP, prefab homes are all over the USA. You won't find them in big cities, but the country has a significant number of them. They aren't a good investment, as they are always the crappiest home in the area and fall apart far quicker.

    15. Re:Just like their trains... by EdIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That depends on the technology being used. Take ecolite concrete for example. I looked into it, and although prefab, it is pretty amazing stuff.

      All steel and a special mixture of concrete. Amazing properties for fire resistance, insulation, strength, etc. All of the 3rd party test reports are available.

      They just replace the load bearing structures and wall framing which is a pretty huge part of the cost and time. You can put up the entire framing of a house in 1-2 days and it will be far more durable and stronger than any wood framing could hope to be.

      After that you can put up whatever you want against the ecolite walls. Sheetrock and textured walls, wood, whatever you want. It's up to you.

      Hard to say that a steel and concrete house with amazing properties (I forgot to mention the acoustic properties) is crappier and will far apart quicker.

    16. Re:Just like their trains... by GT66 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the 1930s, you could order a home from the Sears catalog. It would be a complete kit that you put together on site. My grandmother had one. You'd never know it was a mail-order home.

  2. Beef up YOUR buildings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    P90X for architecture?

  3. Jenga! by Torvac · · Score: 4, Funny

    -nt-

    1. Re:Jenga! by mister2au · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually more like Tetris

      Different pre-formed shapes appear on site and the trick is to slot them in place

      Hopefully the bottom floors don't disappear as they are completed.

  4. kinda cheating by smash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you pre-fab everything on the ground then its not really "building", more like "assembling".

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:kinda cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same as using libraries instead of writing everything from scratch is cheating right?

    2. Re:kinda cheating by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in my day we smelted our own ore. And we liked it!

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:kinda cheating by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This how any high rise is build. It is definitely not cheating.

    4. Re:kinda cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. In civil engineerimng they do something alien called "design" where they spend most of their time. Moving the steel beams around to find where it fits, during construction, is uniquely computer science.

    5. Re:kinda cheating by azalin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, but claiming "the programming was done in one week" when you are actually only compiling it and had 2 years in advance to write the libraries and the documentation. It's still a feat when you have to do all the debugging and testing, but not as impressive as the claim tries to make it sound like.
      I'll be watching it with interest but probably from a distance of 838+|x| meters.

    6. Re:kinda cheating by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it just me or should building skyscrapers not be a speed trial in any case?

    7. Re:kinda cheating by atrizzah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In this case, I'm pretty sure that most of the pre-fabbed parts are specific to this particular building. So the manufacturing time of the pre-fabbed blocks should be considered in the total building time. A lot of software projects have components that are developed as libraries specifically for the project. These certainly would be counted in the development time. That being said, 90 days to assemble the tallest building in the world is still hugely impressive.

    8. Re:kinda cheating by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's because people who order a skyscraper to be built don't call those contracted to design and build it halfway through construction to tell them "Oh yeah, it needs to fly and also double as a ship and a subway station" (which is later clarified to "we need a helipad in the lobby" which itself is finally clarified three months after the deadline, what they meant was "we'd like to make sure there's a second entrance near the 14th street bus stop so employees don't have to walk around the building to get in". Of course, for this to be like software development after each of these change requests they would also demand that work immediately begin on converting the building to the new specs so that by the time it's finished it has wings sticking out from the 12th floor, the basement has a subway tunnel with a large propeller in it and the front desk is placed inside a large hangar).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    9. Re:kinda cheating by MichaelJ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Civil engineers are also held legally responsible and liable if there's a problem, and it should never, ever, fail or fall down outside of extraordinary circumstances. Unlike software which warrants left and right that there is no warranty and if you're lucky you'll get a patch with a bug fix.

      Or compare the licensing requirements:
      Civil Engineering: get a degree, pass the Fundamentals of Engineering, optionally get another degree, work professionally for a number of years, apply to take the PE exam, take the 8-hour PE exam, if you're lucky enough to pass (most don't), you now have your Professional Engineering license in that state (only) and can sign/stamp documents and plans.

      Software Engineering: n/a

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    10. Re:kinda cheating by Evtim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Three engineers were arguing about God.
      God is a mechanical engineer, says one (who is, of course, himself mechanical engineer). Just look at the muscles and bones. What symphony of precision, the seamless work of joints, bones, muscles, sinews. A beauty to behold!
      No, no, says the other, God is an electrical/electronics engineer. Just look at the nervous system – the myriad feedback and forward loops, the firing of the neurons in the brainenough said.
      Chaps, you are both wrong, says the third. God is a civil engineer. Only civil engineer would put a drainpipe in the middle of a recreational area

    11. Re:kinda cheating by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what you're saying is, that people in construction know how to make proper contracts?

      I've actually done software development for and with engineering companies, and the ones I've worked with had a very interesting view on deadlines - they'd rather things work before being put to use, to the point that they'd move the deadline.

      Hell, I got my ass chewed off for working overtime to finish a project on time. My boss (an engineer by trade and education) had taken my project estimation and essentially tripled it before sending it to the client. He wasn't upset that my estimation was off, he was upset that I didn't have the balls to come up and say "hey, there's a problem with this, and I can't make it on time".

      It's amazing to work with those kinds of people. The kind of people that will make it abundantly clear, that the client gets what they paid for, and what they paid for is in the specifications.

      THAT is the biggest problem with IT. Everybody being to scared to say no. Write the specification with the client, get their signature on it. Do not deviate without renegotiating EVERYTHING, including payment and deadlines.

  5. Like the Empire State Building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it may have taken more than 90 days to build the Empire State Building, the same pre-fab techniques such as off-site fabrication and on-site assembly were used to build that monument to the American spirit.

    Everyone scoffs at the Chinese when they boast like this, but there really isn't any particular problem with what they are proposing. Given enough lead time and sufficient raw materials, they should be able to assemble a world-record building in the timeframe specified. Naturally, some leeway may be necessary to account for weather, but other than that, good luck to them.

    1. Re:Like the Empire State Building by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference is the Empire State Building is still here decades later. This building will be moldering and falling apart five years hence. I've seen Chinese buildings built while I was in China, moved away, and then come back for a visit years later and was shocked at the deterioration.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  6. progress by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, from raising a 30 story building in 360 hours to erecting an 830 meter tower in 90 days... why not? Sure they can do it, that's what happens in free markets - innovation and competition.

    1. Re:progress by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of-course, China has much freer market than almost anybody else on the planet, all the businesses that are there, all the people, who moved their investment capital there, all the companies that produce there, you think they are there because China is communist? China is a communist like I am a ballerina.

      Also, China to USA is what Germany is to Greece, except Greece cannot print money and USA can, but the rest of the relationship is the same, USA needs China much more than China needs USA. Here is one of debates on this, the people in the audience don't understand it and don't want to hear about it (no surprise, so many are Chinese expatriates)

  7. I work with Chinese companies a lot, and... by DeathToBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... they ALL say it'll be done in 90 days. Right up to 11:30 on the 89th day, when realistically there is still six years of work to do, they'll still insist it'll be done in the next 30 minutes.

    We have people fly half way around the world to work on projects. "Will you be ready for us?" we ask as we get on the plane. "Yes!" comes the resounding response. We arrive, discover the project is nowhere near ready, go home again, come back in anywhere from eight weeks to two years when it's actually ready and charge them a hefty chunk of cash for the inconvenience.

    Wildly unrealistic schedules and dogged insistence that they're sticking to them in the face of all the evidence is the modus operandi of Chinese construction.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  8. Re:Foundations? by jurgen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They pre-fab even the foundation. Seriously. You can see it in this video this video of them (BSB) erecting a 30-story hotel in 15 days.

  9. Oh great! by oiron · · Score: 3, Informative

    Skyscraper index here we come again!

  10. I don't doubt that they can build a tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a structural engineer, I do not doubt at all that they are able, or anyone for that matter, to put together a prefab tower in 90 days. This is no big deal. For example, in bridge projects it's a terribly common thing to put together temporary structures assembled from tubular steel bars which are about 10-story tall, and there are pre-fabricated steel beams being marketed for this sort of temporary work which are about 20 or 24 meters tall.

    And the only reason that these temp structures aren't taller is because in bridge works after about 20 meters the valleys tend to be wide enough so that it tends to be more economical to use other building techniques, such as incremental launch.

    What I doubt is that this type of tower is economical or capable of handling the design loads for a specific region. After a certain scale, there are significant economical advantages to be had by optimizing structural elements, particular in steel structures, and "one size fits all" make it impossible to take advantage of this. Moreover, there isn't exactly a lot of demand for temporary skyscrappers. Even in cases where a catastrophy raises the need for temporary housing and infrastructure, you don't need a 1km-tall structure to sort things out.

    My main concern is quality assessment and safety. If you are going to build a extremelly specialized and optimized structure intended to house tens of thousands people, you simply cannot rush things or cut corners on safety checks. If some bolts aren't screwed adequately, a lot of people can die. A couple of months ago there was a report on a chinese bridge being inaugurated while its safety railings weren't even bolted to the structure, which has been pointed out by a chinese engineer working on the project. If this sort of rush job is done with such a large structure, we have a calamity waiting to happen.

  11. Re:Some good opportunities await by vivian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At a claimed cost of 628,000,000,000 and supposedly being able to house 100,000, it's a bargain too - only 6280 per person. Here in Aus, housing costs somewhere between 50,000 to about 100,000 per person for housing. (Roughly 100000 per bedroom room for a house, on average.)

  12. Wrong questions by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are asking the wrong questions. It's a cultural thing but if you ask a question that can be answered with "yes", that's all you're going to hear. You need to ask open questions. Instead of "is it going to be done on time?, ask "how far have you gotten?" and so forth. Even then it's not guaranteed that you'll get all the info you were looking for.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Wrong questions by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a "cultural thing", they're just a bunch of cutthroat bloody liars who never take responsibility for or even admit to failure, and I'm middlingly sick of hearing it excused as "culture, man, you have to understand the culture". It's just plain old deception to keep the funding coming for another month.

      IME, the only way to deal with it is to pay for fully QA'd, stamped and sealed results, not development. Apropos to this case, I'd pay for their magical tower in annual instalments after it was put up and stayed up.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  13. translation question by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you post a Chinese translation of "Hey y'all, watch this!"?

  14. Soil? by Guillaume+le+Btard · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Shanghai and on the other side of the river in Pudong we have quite a lot of tall buildings (Jin Mao tower 420m, Oriental Perl Tower 468m, Shanghai World Financial Center 492m) so I have no doubt that the Chinese have had some 'inspiration' from western builders on how to construct a tower. But I am wondering how the soil can deal with such a rapid construction of such a tall, thus heavy, building. Where I come from, the Netherlands, we have to put in a pretty good foundation for our buildings or they will sink into the soil. I can imagine that if you want to build such a tall building you would need some more time to allow the soil to solidify more or you'll risk the building sinking...

  15. they said the same thing about the train station by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In beijing. The sparkly, new main train station was built in half the time normally required. 6 months later you could see daylight through the cracks in the ceiling. This is the real maoist legacy: make ridiculous claims, pretend you accomplished them, then blame running dog capitalists and rightists when it al blows up.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  16. Access to the site & some basic math by Alomex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I know about skyscraper construction, the biggest challenge will be access to the site. There is just so much material that needs to be delivered to put up a building of that height at that pace, even if prefabricated.

    I'm aware they built a hotel in 15 days, but this building is about 300x times larger by mass and they are only giving themselves 6x more time. This means they have to work at a 50x rate as compared to the previous project.

    Conclusion: color me doubtful.

  17. In a related story... by bigtone78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    An Indian company as said that they can clean up the mess caused by the collapse of the Chinese building in only 60 days.