Slashdot Mirror


NYC's Trash-Sucking Tubes May Be Upgraded, Expanded

derekmead writes "When urban planners were trying to turn New York's Roosevelt Island from a haven for the disabled and the mentally ill into a liveable city, they got utopian. Lying beneath their plans was an unusual technology: a series of tubes that literally suck garbage from buildings at speeds up to 60 miles per hour to a central collection point, where the trash is taken off the island by truck or barge. Theoretically, that eliminates the emissions and traffic caused by giant garbage trucks, and makes trash sorting easier. Now, more than thirty years after the 'AVAC,' or Automated Vacuum Collection System, was installed, Envac, the Swedish company that built it, is exploring how to upgrade it and even extend the system to other parts of the city. Under a new feasibility study conducted by City University and funded by two city agencies, the easiest option would be to stretch the current system south, to cover the new technology campuses being built on Roosevelt Island by Cornell University and the Technion. "

12 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. A series of tubes? by Bodhammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean like the internet? I don't think we need more tubes that move garbage...

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  2. As the article says by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It works, you just have to be mindful of what you put in it.
    Stereos? Rebar? I guess people will be idiots.

    1. Re:As the article says by instarx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I lived on Roosevelt Island for many years. Individuals don't put anything into the system. The building maintenance staffs do that. Residents just drop their bagged garbage down a shut and it is put into the collection system from there.

  3. Re:Big enough to suck in a small child or pet. by Krater76 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or what could go right?

    If we end up with the (New) New York City from Futurama with transport tubes, I for one will welcome our new Omicron Persei overlords.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  4. Warning by Megahard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do not put your dick in the trash sucking tube.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:Warning by Megahard · · Score: 5, Funny

      +5 Informative????!? Ok, here's some more tips for lonely slashdotters:
      Do not put your dick in the light socket
      Do not put your dick in the milking machine
      Do not put your dick in the salami slicing machine
      Do not put your dick in the toaster
      Do not put your dick in anything that's been dead for more than 5 hours

      There must have been countless horrific injuries before we had the internet to dispense this essential information.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  5. Re:Big enough to suck in a small child or pet. by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So we'll still have to hack the adult bodies into smaller pieces?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  6. Re:Sound stupid by jesseck · · Score: 4, Funny

    UDP... I like to live in the moment.

  7. Re:Some things don't smell right-- by instarx · · Score: 5, Informative

    And how is "sorting easier" when it's flying into a "central collection point" (read: steadily growing pile) at 60 mph?

    I lived on Roosevelt Island for many years. The trash is sorted in the building by residents (as in all NYC apartment buildings). Recyclables are run through the vacuum system at one time of day, and garbage during another time of day. It does help with the sorting at the collection station.

  8. Re:Big enough to suck in a small child or pet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know, aren't the NYC subways great?

  9. Re:Some things don't smell right-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > I would imagine that large buildings in NYC would require daily pickup

    Obviously it's a bit of a special case, but I think the World Trade Center's garbage transfer facility actually kept some engineers busy for a few months planning it back in the late 60s or early 70s. Without getting into the obvious implications of Force = mass x acceleration, where acceleration = 9.8 meters/second per second and the potential energy from a thousand-foot drop, a single tower of the old WTC generated trash during the day faster than trucks could physically back into the loading dock, fill up, and haul it away. Apparently, they were mostly able to keep up until around 10:30am, then the first wave of trash hit from the morning coffee breaks, lunch pushed them into the realm of "hopeless", and they didn't finally catch up and get the system "emptied" again until sometime around 4am (the trash continued well past midnight, because the cleaning crews themselves generated wave after wave of trash).

    From what I read, an entire category of trash management came into existence with the World Trade Center, from compaction all the way to heavy-duty trucks capable of dealing with a huge load of densely-packed trash. I believe that some new skyscrapers in China actually have on-site incinerators.

  10. Re:bad idea because of... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Informative

    It'd have to be piston driven from behind because no velocity of air can dislodge certain viscosity materials and no reasonable air pressure can move heavy metals.

    Your speculations are rendered moot by the fact that this system has been operating successfully for 35 years now.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.