Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

2 New Social Networks With Very Different Political Twists

Posted by timothy on from the choose-your-paradigm dept.

judgecorp writes "Frustrated at the off-topic chatter on Twitter, British MP Louise Mensch has launched a supposedly rival service. Despite the name, Menshn, this is apparently not a hoax, but a site aimed at 'on-topic' conversation, initially around the U.S. election. Mensch is a former 'chick lit' author, and a Member of Parliament since 2010. She has taken part in questioning of Rupert and James Murdoch, and urged control of social media." If "control of social media" urged by sitting politicians strikes you as undesirable, or the hyper-focused content seems constraining, take heart: an anonymous reader points out an online community of a different stripe — a social network launched by Wikileaks, intended to be "a secure, surveillance-resistant social network purpose-built for Friends of WikiLeaks." Whether or not your politics line up with those of most Wikileaks supporters, you might wish for some of the features FoWL is designed to provide: "By design your details are encrypted, and hidden from everyone except your immediate contacts. Even we can't access them. Connected by FoWL, friends of WikiLeaks will communicate however they like, including using secure person-to-person methods. As the network grows away from the site infrastructure, it becomes autonomous and decentralized, opaque to observers and impossible to compromise."

5 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Irony by jguevin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it that hard to distinguish between individual privacy and abusive and/or illegal secrecy in government?

  2. Sad.. by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When she was elected, I thought Louise Mensch might actually be some use in Parliament. Certainly a lot of the attacks on her have been (a) unmerited and (b) seem to come from people who are not quite right in the head. But Arianna Huffington she is not. And it is pretty clear that, no matter how MPs of all parties may complain about News International and its proprietor, David Cameron is determined that no harm shall come to Murdoch, his cashflow, or (given the retention of Hunt) Murdoch's moles. Rather than waste time on a website doomed to oblivion, shouldn't she be trying to get her own party on board the prevention of foreign media interference in the UK Government?

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  3. Give my personal informatino to wikileaks? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who in their right mind would give private information to an organization that has made it's reputation on exposing private information to the public. Seems like a no brainer to avoid that site if you ask me.

    1. Re:Give my personal informatino to wikileaks? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This again? Find me one person whose name was on the list and who was NOT already known to be an informant. Good luck. Finally, as to the original poster's point -how much different would it be from a) a corporation selling it to other corporations and governments, and b) if it is really as secure as they say - and they should release the code, who cares where it comes from?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  4. Re:Attractive female politician + coder?! by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'll probably have to wait until men can gestate, give birth to, and then nurse a baby.
    Until then, sex will matter.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!