Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Good Low Cost Free Software For Protecting Kids Online?

An anonymous reader writes "I have two kids, 7 and 8. I would love to allow them internet access on a regular basis. The problem is what's out there: I really don't want them to deal with porn ads and such, but making either a blacklist or a whitelist myself would take months. So I figured I would ask you: what free software would you use with preferably prebuilt lists to protect your kids online? What is out there with fairly easy configuration ability (to allow for game servers — they love Minecraft), but secure enough they can't just bypass it using a Google search?"

7 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. OpenDNS by mcgoohan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Try OpenDNS. It's got good granularity for filtering criteria and you can either filter at your router, or on a per-computer basis.

    Plus, their founder has a /. UID of 17.

  2. Bsecure Online by spiffydudex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My father uses this software, BSecure Whole Home Filtering. Its great, you can customize the filters to your hearts content. Plus you can cover all the computers in your network by changing DNS servers on your router.

    Link: http://www.bsecure.com/

  3. Re:Watch them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's what I do. I find that the kids are not really interested in anything that could accidentally stumble across anything untoward. YouTube is the main problem site, but hey saturday morning pop videos are bloody awful and you can't do much about that.

    With our oldest I set up a non-network account (iptable block rule based on userid (on linux)) so that when he was left at home alone there was no internet access, but he could still play local games, use open office etc.

  4. Re:Watch them by lightknight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know, seriously. Kids have a lot more energy, and creativity, when it comes to acquiring a taboo item. Thinking of my own childhood, you're better off trying to explain, using proper (adult) reasoning, why your social values need to be respected by them rather than trying to put up magic walls to block the offending material. Remember, the first time a kid catches you lying to them, all bets are off; they'll question everything from that day forward, and test things when you aren't around.

    I'd be more worried if they didn't find a way around that filter.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  5. Re:Teaching kids the ability to discern by l810c · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is the "Real World"?

    My kid knows right vs. wrong.

    He just turned 9 and my wife and I (and our many friends and their children) all fully agree that he has Never lied in his life. We are not worried about Him, we are worried about the INTERNET shoving completely inappropriate things down to him.

    It doesn't take a very creative Google search to come up with some fully inappropriate content.

    And it's getting Worse!

    By the day!!

    FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!, AMEN!!, but not to my 9 Year Old.

  6. No television then? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The worst stuff is in fact on television and is cleared for viewing by children. Fast food, gratuitous violence, conspicuous consumption. While I have concerns about things like objectification - whether of women or men - the worst objectification isn't a few pictures of naked women on the Internet; it is the ruthless objectification promoted by "reality" shows, "dating" shows and so on.

    I simply don't think that 9 year olds should be using the Internet unsupervised. But I definitely think that children should not have TV sets in their rooms. (In fact, the majority view of my children is not to have TV in the house).

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  7. Re:Net Nanny by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Aaah yes, because fetishism is a sign of mental illness...
    No, it's not, the fact that some shrinks haven't caught up to the times is not my problem.
    The vast majority of people have fetishest fantasies, many are comfortable expressing it and live happier lives because of that.

    The fact that more and more people reach that level of comfort at an earlier age is not a bad thing, it's a GOOD thing.

    Let me put it this way - me and my wife are planning to have children, we already decided that our habit of being naked around the house will not change. We will not suddenly start hiding the handcuffs and spanking paddles lying about the house, we will not suddenly put a lock on the play-room door and order them never to enter it - we'll just tell them "when the door is closed, you cannot come in."

    Many people think that raises HEALTHIER children. In many cultures, that is how ALL children are raised (most of Europe).

    In Dutch culture for example it's common for teenagers to have a sit-down with their parents when they feel ready to have sex and discuss it with them - the young couple asking for advice (not just practical but on the whole thing) before going ahead.
    It's also normal practice to get consent, along with good advice.

    The Netherlands boasts one of the lowest teen pregnancy rates in the world. And get this bit: 70% of American's regret the timing or person with whom they had their first sexual experience according to studies. In the Netherlands, only 15% would like to change anything.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *