Slashdot Mirror


Iran Claims New Cyber Attack On Its Nuclear Plants, Blames US and Allies

judgecorp writes "Iran has reported that its nuclear facilities are under a sustained cyber attack which it blames on the U.S., UK and Israel. America and Israel created Stuxnet, and have been accused of starting the Flame worm." And once a country admits that it's created such software, publicly deflecting such blame gets a lot harder.

10 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, stop acting surprised, Iran by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure you've figured out by now that the U.S. and Israel are trying to sabotage your nuclear program. If the numerous targeted computer viruses didn't clue you in, you must have at least noticed the dead bodies of your nuclear scientists starting to pile up.

    Don't you know there's a war on, son?

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Oh, stop acting surprised, Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean we should expect to be attacked by Iran?

      okay.jpg

      You really think civilian infrastructure is safe ? If the US can develop a software that targets vulnerabilities in industrial control systems, so can every other country. Mind you, what the US has done is an attack on a sovereign country. What do you think would happen if malwares started disrupting energy power plants, etc... in the US ?
      The US has opened pandora's box, and there is no going back. You can't control malware the same way you can try to control nuclear weapons. Just wait and see.

    2. Re:Oh, stop acting surprised, Iran by mr.mctibbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fun speculation, but the news seems to have that covered already:

      http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/

      It appears that Israel is in fact using the MEK to assassinate these scientists. This is the same organization, by the way, that several US politicians are supporting openly, despite the organization being on our list of terrorist organizations. Looks like Israel's a state sponsor of terror. Who would have guessed?

    3. Re:Oh, stop acting surprised, Iran by BlueStrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You say that like you think that's not exactly what the US wants?

      All the cyber contractors have been itching for it for ages. The lobbyists are simply going to going to start to get a return on their investment.

      Cha ching!

      Yeah, it's all about job security for a bunch of government contractors.

      It couldn't possibly be to prevent Iran from detonating the first working nuke they can patch together in Jerusalem and setting off a horrible, and *nuclear*, conflict with millions dead, and plunge the world into chaos & war.

      Nah.

      Couldn't possibly be that. Even though Ahma-Nutjob has repeatedly and sincerely publicly promised to do just that.

      When do we start taking our enemy's repeatedly stated and plainly spoken basic intentions at face value? The world tends, for some strange reason, to want to ignore plain statements and intentions from such people and regimes. Germany was ignored in the 1930s as well.

      It feels almost like the 1930s again. Anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide again, just as then. Jews are being portrayed as the evil behind all the world's woes again, just as then.

      History repeats itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like too many people are intelligent enough, or have been taught enough history, to see that the evil & hatred we had once defeated is rising again. Or they naively hope to benefit politically from the hatred, and so go all-in supporting it.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  2. Re:Disgraceful by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Israel spies on the US a hell of a lot. So on one hand it seems like a Faustian bargain for the NSA or CIA to get in bed with Mossad.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  3. Re:Bad Idea? by Ostracus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does one "meltdown" a centrifuge?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  4. Re:Blame someone else for incompetance by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You think the US government couldn't buy the source to QNX, find an exploit, and embed that in a trojan that they convince someone to sneakernet across the air gap?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  5. Re:Admits? by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the "I want to believe" factor is just too good to pass up

    The "I want NOT to believe" factor is even stronger for people like you. You've got some of the most reputable newspapers in the country reporting it from real sources (though, of course, anonymous for obvious reasons). You've got Congress investigating how it leaked, the President saying "I didn't leak it," drunk Israeli generals bragging about it, etc. Short of a "Yep, we did it" official press release from the NSA, that's about as good as it gets.

    But some people want to keep their head buried deep in the sand, I guess. That's fine. But not all of us are from Missouri.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  6. Re:And the UK! by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The UK sponsored and the US assisted with the Shah overthrowing the elected government. The UK was the prime player in this because they were the former colonial power. As a result, all the brainwashing done on every Iranian citizen about how evil the west is focuses on the UK and US. When something bad happens the natural response is to tap into all that brainwashing and blame the US and UK along with Israel (whom every leader in the mideast blamed for every problem for decades). So it doesn't matter what's happened, if someone is being blamed for something it's ALWAYS the US, UK and Israel. Doesn't matter what it is or even if it's related or not.

  7. LOL! by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It couldn't possibly be to prevent Iran from detonating the first working nuke they can patch together in Jerusalem

    I laugh every single time I hear this line of reasoning.

    Iran is run by religious nutjobs. I agree with that.

    One thing you seem to forget, though...Jerusalem is their holy land too. While they may be nutjobs, they're still religious nutjobs, and blowing up their own holy land is a great way to piss off every member of the three major religions worldwide. Iran would be crushed in the blink of an eye if they actually launched a nuclear attack. They are simply not that stupid and irrational. It would be like Republicans bombing the White House because Obama won the election.

    It couldn't possibly be that Iran would want a nuclear weapon so that they can participate in the joy of Mutually Assured Destruction. It couldn't possibly be that multiple world superpowers who have nuclear weapons rattle the saber at them on a monthly basis and that having a nuke of their own might give them some leverage. (or even giving off the appearance of trying to acquire a nuke - that's why Saddam never debunked rumors that he had WMD, because having your enemies think you have WMD generally makes them less likely to attack you)

    It couldn't possibly be that the "wipe off the map" comment (which I assume is what you're alluding to) was a mistranslation, considering that idiom doesn't even exist in the Persian language...it couldn't possibly be that the true meaning was "the Israeli regime will be removed from the pages of history", kinda like how the USSR collapsed after the cold war...

    Nah. Couldn't possibly be that...

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: