Slashdot Mirror


How the Militarization of the Internet is Changing Warfare

puddingebola writes in with a link to a New York Times article about how the militarization of the internet is changing contemporary warfare. "The decision by the United States and Israel to develop and then deploy the Stuxnet computer worm against an Iranian nuclear facility late in George W. Bush's presidency marked a significant and dangerous turning point in the gradual militarization of the Internet. Washington has begun to cross the Rubicon. If it continues, contemporary warfare will change fundamentally as we move into hazardous and uncharted territory. It is one thing to write viruses and lock them away safely for future use should circumstances dictate it. It is quite another to deploy them in peacetime. Stuxnet has effectively fired the starting gun in a new arms race that is very likely to lead to the spread of similar and still more powerful offensive cyber-weaponry across the Internet. Unlike nuclear or chemical weapons, however, countries are developing cyber-weapons outside any regulatory framework."

5 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Peacetime? by highphilosopher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have been at ware since early 2000's. It's not peacetime.

  2. Military Meet Internet... by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wasn't the original purpose of the Internet to serve the military?

  3. Say what?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    marked a significant and dangerous turning point in the gradual militarization of the Internet.

    And all these attacks coming out of Chinese universities are what, game playing?

    Military takes on all mediums so it was inevitable efforts would evolve. WW III (should it come) will certainly involve a lot of concentrated attacks over the web, to bring it down, because it's far faster communication than simple radio or Television and goes around the world in milliseconds.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. Peacetime? by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Peacetime? The US has only been at "peace" for a handful of years in its history, the rest of the years it has been fighting people abroad such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc. People within its own borders (Indian wars) or arming, training and supporting violence in other countries ("war on drugs"). By abolishing peacetime, the government is allowed to ransack our liberties, steal our income even more and stifle dissent. Keep in mind we are still under a state of emergency because of "terrorism" first enacted by Bush and then extended every year by Obama.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  5. This did not start with Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is a grossly inaccurate to state "Stuxnet has effectively fired the starting gun in a new arms race...". On the contrary, Stuxnet only makes a large percentage of the population aware of an arms race that started long ago.