Slashdot Mirror


Home Office To Ignore Wikipedia Founder's Petition Against O'Dwyer Extradition

An anonymous reader writes "The Home Office has confirmed home secretary Theresa May will not block TVShack founder Richard O'Dwyer's U.S. extradition, despite widespread calls for her to do so." It would appear the fate of the tvshack founder is now sealed.

8 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. The War on Youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, one more small battle in the War on Youth. Let's see: cameras in the streets, ASBOs, patents that kill new competition, laws against drugs, laws against sharing, laws against resisting arrest, student loans, sugar-laden foods, credit card debt, loss of permanent jobs, the list goes on. The UK and USA lead the world in the War on Youth, which pits the old against the young. Extraditing a couple of "pirates" is just consistent with this theme.

  2. Swap Richard for Bob Diamond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bet they don't extradite Bob Diamond for overseeing the fraud of vast amounts of money that may actually have done real damage to US citizens, never mind the UK and the rest of the world.

  3. Re:Conservative party Minister: so pro USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In America you have the the Republicans, who are the equivalent of our Conservative party, and the Democrats, who are the equivalent of our Conservative party....

  4. Absurd by xenobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a UK citizen can be extradited to the US for breaking US law outside the US while physically never setting foot on US soil, why don't we see people getting extradited to all sorts of countries for breaking their laws while sitting in our homes in our own countries?

    Second, extradition is for serious crimes only. Why wasn't the request squashed as it's only related to a civil matter of copyright infringement, not a criminal offense?

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    1. Re:Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait, that brings up a thought - why can't Greece extradite Jamie Dimon & Lloyd Blankfein to Greece for their "crimes" at defrauding the country into massive debt? After all, if the US can extradite someone for something as "horrible" as posting *links* to *other sites* that contain copyrighted material, *surely* outright financial fraud ought to be extraditable. :-)

  5. Re:Time and Place by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I fire a gun from the England border into Scotland and kill someone, you can bet I'll be extradited to Scotland to stand trial for murder.

    Isn't the slight difference that murder is a crime in both countries, whereas copyright infringement isn't?

    I don't think I've ever heard of anyone being extradited for a civil matter before, although no doubt someone can prove me wrong.

    I have zero personal sympathy for this guy. I read an interview recently in which he said he had spent the GBP140K he had earned from his website on "normal student things" like going to the cinema and buying pizza. Which is such a load of bollocks it's a joke..

    However, he certainly shouldn't be extradited for this. If this had been the other way round, there is no way he would have been extradited from the US to the UK even if he had committed a real, serious crime.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  6. Re:Time and Place by Dan541 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait until countries like Pakistan and Iran get in on this. All western women will need to be deported for stoning.

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  7. Scary by Coisiche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Dr. Ben Goldacre has just tweeted, "it's the little things like extradition at the behest of a corporation that make you worry the whole world is corrupt".

    I think that ship may have sailed.