Slashdot Mirror


How Open Source Hardware Is Driving the 3D-Printing Industry

TheNextCorner sends this quote from ReadWriteWeb: "Open source software has been a key player in all kinds of disruptive technologies — from the Web to big data. Now the nascent and growing open source hardware movement is helping to power its own disruptive revolution. ... As 3D printing, powered by Arduino and other open source technologies, becomes more prevalent, economies of scale become much less of a problem. A 3D printer can print a few devices — or thousands — without significant retooling, pushing upfront costs to near-zero. This is what The Economist calls the 'Third Industrial Revolution,' where devices and things can be made in smaller, cleaner factories with far less overhead and — significantly — less labor."

14 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Material costs - material generally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently, the cost of materials for most 3D printers is quite high. That makes 3D printing uneconomical for most purposes.

    The other problem is that most useful things are made of more than one material. Consider even something as simple as a toaster. It requires a good conductor, a resisting conductor, an insulator and structural material. So, even something as low tech as a toaster is well beyond the ability of 3D printers to make at all and especially to do so economically.

    1. Re:Material costs - material generally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Imagine plastic recycling: plastic bags or wrappings shreded and then fed to 3d printers - that's what I am waiting for.

    2. Re:Material costs - material generally by Dynetrekk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was wrong - they're up to 14 simultaneous materials, at least: http://www.objet.com/Objet%20Connex350/

    3. Re:Material costs - material generally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      However it is a hell of a lot cheaper to print a physical object on a 3d printer than it is to try and get one of something you can't buy, manufactured.

      3D printers are great for printing spares when the manufacturer doesn't supply them... and cheaper than buying the whole product again.

    4. Re:Material costs - material generally by LuxuryYacht · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The prices of Photopolymers used in SLA type 3D printers has dropped to below the cost of PLA and ABS used in FDM printers and continues to drop. Photopolymers are dropping to under $10/kg in high volumes, so the costs of the materials are becoming less of an issue.

      It's true that there are several open hardware printer projects for FDM type printers that focus mainly on printing with one material at a time such as
      RepRap or Open Source Photopolymer DLP 3D Printers such as LemonCurry

      3D printers are also printing with more than one material and are already printing multilayer printed circuit boards with only fluids. Much of the development work in 3D printers recently has been from open hardwave projects vs the industry since many of the old patents have now expired.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
    5. Re:Material costs - material generally by RobinH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then your wait is almost over, as it's been created, and they're ramping it up (and it's open source). Here's the kickstarter link.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  2. A post scarcity society by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The loss of jobs need not be a bad thing in what is quickly approaching a post scarcity society. Ultimately, perhaps even within the next few centuries, we're going to see a situation where the abundant resources in our solar system are harvested and processed by mostly automated engines, providing an excellent (upper middle class) quality of life for everyone on earth. There is no physical reason why this should not be the case.

    Pollution and environmental concerns would be very minimal with adequate management, energy is abundant, and if anything providing a good standard of living reverses population growth.

    The main difference between that and today, other than a general longer, healthier, better life, would be the types of toys you get to play with if you excel. Obviously not everyone can have their own private ocean liner, there's only so much ocean, so artificial scarcity will need to be introduced by either fiat or economic acrobatics. Overall though we are I believe on the cusp of a golden age.

    1. Re:A post scarcity society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no physical reason why this should not be the case.

      Now if only it'd be that simple.

      At the moment, replacing dangerous and tedious jobs no one really wants by much more effective machines is everything the government and our whole economic system is trying to stop. How did this happen? How are we any better than those in the middle ages when we fight progress in the name of old beliefs of capitalism?

    2. Re:A post scarcity society by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you could come up with a proposal for feeding and housing all those people who lose their income then you'd be on to a winner. Opposing progress is perfectly understandable when progress will make you jobless and therefore unable to feed, clothe and house yourself. And don't say 'retrain'. That costs money and time, and in the meantime the rent or mortgage isn't being paid.

    3. Re:A post scarcity society by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is always some scarcity, especially with regards to housing (hint: there is a finite amount of land available). Hence I don't think housing (for example) will ever be free.

    4. Re:A post scarcity society by khakipuce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suppose this is what one would expect from anyone with "open source space travel" in their sig. We are nowhere near approaching a "post scarcity society", go to Africa or India and tell the significant proportion of the earth's populaton that live in poverty that we are approaching a "post scarcity society"!

      On the 3D printing front, gimme one that prints steel, aluminium alloys, etc. with the structural integrity of their conventially produced equivalents (i.e. not sintered) and I'll start to take this discussion seriously.

      --
      Art is the mathematics of emotion
    5. Re:A post scarcity society by BlackPignouf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Post-scarcity society" ???
      What a load of bullshit.
      Have you ever heard of peak-oil? Do you realise 80% of our energy demand is covered by fossil fuels? Have you heard of global warming?

      Do yourself a favor, and go read this :
      http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/04/economist-meets-physicist/

  3. Re:Is there an open source hardware specification. by phme · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out RepRap and MakerBot

  4. Re:Free Complexity at the cost of speed by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's still not mass producing - it's custom desktop fabrication. It's like laser printing in the 80s... very slow but nice quality. So in the near future it's still mostly for prototyping or small scale runs.

    Good point. If and when enough people have access to these printers, and if they are sufficiently standardized, you will not need mass production anymore. Or rather, the product is still produced in mass, but in many small fabs or even on the desktop, as opposed to requiring a single massive factory in China. It's distributed production. The point is that it's not necessary for these printers to become so fast that they can produce thousands of products per hour. If you're printing at home, you will probably print only a few items every day at most, and you'll be able to afford wait times of an hour or so.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...