Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Model A Makes First Appearance

An anonymous reader writes "It's easy to forget that the Raspberry Pi currently shipping is the more expensive model of the board. It is actually called the Model B as it sports more features than the $25 Model A. The main differences [compared to the B model] include a lack of an Ethernet port and the associated networking chip, as well as the presence of only one USB port instead of two. There was originally going to be less memory on the Model A (128MB instead of 256MB), but the Raspberry Pi Foundation managed to make enough cost savings during a redesign to increase the amount to 256MB on the cheaper version. With all the focus being on the Model B, we haven't actually seen the (near) final Model A board yet. But that changes today, as Eben Upton has just shown off the $25 board."

101 comments

  1. English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The main differences include a lack of an Ethernet port and the associated networking chip, as well as the presence of only being one USB port instead of two."

    There are editors somewhere aren't there? That understand English?

    1. Re:English please? by nadaou · · Score: 4, Informative

      > There are editors somewhere aren't there?

      No, generally not. This is a semi-automated crowd sourced news aggregation site not a tech news magazine. Spend some time at firehose.pl to understand how it works and how stories get voted onto the front page, typically more verbatim* than not.

      * if that made you cringe then comfort yourself in knowing that it was only a partially unique experience.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    2. Re:English please? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any problems reading it. Maybe a grammar nazi could point out the issues?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:English please? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      "include a lack of an ethernet port" is weird but correct; "the presence of only being one USB port" is weird and wrong, although easy to read.

      i love the english language, but i usually hate grammar nazis even more. still, it's a bit ridiculous what gets onto slashdot's front page. since US-centrism is in their official policy, you'd think they would use english correctly.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:English please? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      since US-centrism is in their official policy, you'd think they would use english correctly.

      Haha.The American language forked from 'English' in 1776. Any mutual intelligibility is purely coincidental! :)

    5. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American language forked from 'English' in 1776.

      Fair dinkum.

      Cheers!

      -Boz from Oz

    6. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair dinkum.

      Hey - watch your language!

    7. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      English - the ultimate free and open source project.

    8. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's interesting is that American English is closer to what everyone spoke then than British English.

    9. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you retarded?

    10. Re:English please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a neat little coincidence, but I'd wager it forked before that given we already had regional accents at that time.

    11. Re:English please? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you mean that American English has refused to incorporate bug fixes from upstream.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:English please? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      since US-centrism is in their official policy, you'd think they would use english correctly.

      Haha.The American language forked from 'English' in 1776. Any mutual intelligibility is purely coincidental! :)

      From what I've read, it's more accurate to say that "English" forked from English and American is in many ways closer to what we had in the days of King George (no, not "W", George III).

      Except that we cleaned up the spelling a little.

  2. Interesting. by queazocotal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So - no CSI/DSI - for which there are no drivers anyway.
    No ethernet port.
    I do wonder what that white blob in place of the ethernet/USB hub chip is.
    Is it simply a bit of tape, to cover some wires linking the USB directly to the SoC, or something else.

    As to why this is an interesting bit of hardware - it's not.
    It's interesting because it's a relatively open platform, at a reasonable price point.

    Devices I want a model A for.
    Wifi weather-station controller.
    Heating controller.
    Door camera system.

    1. Re:Interesting. by pipatron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      My main issue with the device is that they crippled the openess to include something that no one in this target group actually wants - 1080p video.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    2. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you know that no one wants that? I for one do want it.

    3. Re:Interesting. by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Informative

      My main issue with the device is that they crippled the openess to include something that no one in this target group actually wants - 1080p video.

      Unless you want to run XBMC, and turn a dumb TV into a smartTV for $25.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    4. Re:Interesting. by sirsnork · · Score: 4, Informative

      The schematics show that when the ethernet chip (also a USB hub) is missing there are two SMD resistors that connect the actual port up to the single USB pins on the main SOC. When the chip is present those resistors are left off and that port goes into the ethernet chip to give both ethernet connectivity and two additional USB ports.

      No idea what the white blob is, but it's not something required to make the USB port work.

      No idea why the CSI connector isn't attached, seemingly there is nothing stopping it working if the header is attached as it's completely supplied by the main SOC

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    5. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after that you can play...??? Some of the really useful codecs are not licensed for this platform. Please let us know when you find out how to play enough different types of media to call it a "media player".

    6. Re:Interesting. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Please let us know when you find out how to play enough different types of media to call it a "media player".

      HTH, HAND

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Interesting. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The 'white blob' looks rather shiny to me, with some slight 'striping', I'd guess a fuzzy picture of some unpopulated solder pads...

    8. Re:Interesting. by Polo · · Score: 1

      Why would you assume that, I do!

    9. Re:Interesting. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2

      i bought it because it has 1080p video

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    10. Re:Interesting. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You can use it with any monitor or display having HDMI input as a wireless remote display for any Android device, for one thing. Only 400 million of us have those though, so it's probably a niche application. A few more niches like that might add up to a popular market one day. How many of these were they going to make again?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:Interesting. by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      My main issue with the device is that they crippled the openess to include something that no one in this target group actually wants - 1080p video.

      Not bad, not bad. I can see you put little effort into your troll post, but everybody loves a trier.

      I particularly enjoyed your "nobody wants 1080p" attempt, but unfortunately the trollish aspect was pretty obvious, so it failed to work well.

      Next time, try more subtlety in the false statement to see if you can catch anybody out, but in all, ill rate your trolling attempt a 4/10.

      Better luck next time dude.

    12. Re:Interesting. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      So, I need a $250 game console (or $200 PC) turned on and running a server to transcode files to something the $25 Pi can play? That doesn't make sense, economic or otherwise.

      It does if you already own the PC, and it's up and running in another room anyway for one reason or another, and you already own the TV, and the TV doesn't have its own media player which could connect to a DLNA server or similar, and you don't have a HTPC connected to your TV, or you think you can save enough money by not running your HTPC that it's worth it to buy one of these devices. That in fact applies to a staggeringly large number of households. A much smaller number of them, of course, are going to do this, not least because at this point it takes some knowledge. That doesn't change the potential utility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It beats paying another $200 for a 2nd frontend, unless $200-$25 does not come out in positive where you are from?

    14. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I need a $250 game console (or $200 PC) turned on and running a server to transcode files to something the $25 Pi can play? That doesn't make sense, economic or otherwise. I'll pass.

      No. You need a better argument. Or a point. Or even a life.
      If you have one TV set in the household.. No point.

      If you have a £200 computer with a couple of tuners attached to the main TV set, acting as a media server, keep your entire music collection, your video collection and recorded TV shows on it.. And use a script to transcode the newly captured video files into one of the supported codecs, which are then streamed over the network to second and subsequent TV sets.. Including older sets with only composite inputs.. Then yes. It makes a hell of a lot more sense that using a separate $200 computer attached to each set to do the same job.

      If your objective is to figure out ways something will not work, however poorly thought out.. you will always be successful. But eternally pointless and unloved. Posting bitter little comments snidely on forums where nobody can punch you in the face.
      If your objective is to figure out how to get something to work, you will not always be successful. However, you will be happy when you crack a problem. And people will want to listen to you.. even in person.

    15. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no points for your arguments but a few giggles for the humour. Your barely coherent rambling was way too long to read in its entirety. There might be a career for you in reality TV. Bonus if you make as little sense speaking as you do in prose.

    16. Re:Interesting. by klaws · · Score: 2

      That "white spot" is the ground plane + heat sink for the ethernet/usb hub IC.

      --
      - KLS
    17. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like the solder for the thermal pad under that missing chip. They probably used the same solder paste stencil for both versions, which means the paste that would have bonded that chip is just a big shiny blob instead.

  3. Re:POS by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Informative

    This "crippled piece of shit" can, among thousands of other things, run XBMC and output 1080p video, turning and dumb TV into a smartTV. Not too shabby for $25.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  4. Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How does that Broadcom SoC compare to the current Shenzen's SoC king the disruptive $7 Allwinner-A10 SoC?

    Bonus: comes with open source GPU driver, unlike RasPi.

    1. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by kwalker · · Score: 1

      For those of us outside mainland China, how would we get our hands on one of these?

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    2. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      I really like it. Is there a cheap and open system available with it, like an EOMA-68 with mini-engineering board around it?

    3. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by coliverhb · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some other people doing low-cost A10/A13 board stuff:
      Olimex are developing an A13-based board currently.

      Gooseberry is an A10-based board sourced from a tablet designer.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    5. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The A10 runs Ubuntu and Debian armhf. It is already way, way faster in most tasks than the RasPi, even without the GPU drivers being finished yet.

    6. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Vairon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Allwinner A10 has an incomplete 72 page summary of features that calls itself a datasheet compared to a fairly nice 205 page peripheral datasheet for the Broadcom BCM2835 SOC in the Raspberry Pi.

      The Allwinner A10, like the BCM2835, uses closed source proprietary libraries to access 3D features of its GPU. The MALI 400 GPU is being reverse engineered which is why there is a preliminary open source GPU driver.

      The Allwinner A10 CPU/GPU are faster but less efficient and use more power than the Raspberry Pi's BCM2835.

      The Rhombus Allwinner A10 has no final cost yet unlike the Raspberry Pi. They are hoping to hit a $15 price point if they purchase 100,000 units. The Raspberry Pi is available today at $35 which was achieved with only an initial 10,000 units purchased.

    7. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Bonus: comes with open source GPU driver, unlike RasPi.

      Bonus: comes with PRC backdoor built-in! Of course, the RasPi probably does too...

    8. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Microlith · · Score: 2

      comes with open source GPU driver, unlike RasPi.

      Really? Where are the sources? I know the limaproject is trying to implement one, but I have yet to see an open source driver that does anything more than bare-bones 2D support, let alone actual 3D.

    9. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the clarification.

    10. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by drwho · · Score: 1

      Olimex and gooseberry both look decent, but what is the price or target price? I for my rasp-pi-B, but it's too expensive for me to use it to roll out the project I want which would require a larger number of boards at a lower price. I don't care about video I want: 1) low cost 2) 2+ USB ports 3) some rudimentary DSP, a sound card will do and most importantly I want Debian compatibility.

    11. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by citizenr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Raspberry Pi is available today at $35

      Stop lying. Its LISTED on a site somewhere, but its NOT available. You can click it, send money and wait till November, thats not selling, thats pre ordering.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    12. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by dululu · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi is available today at $35

      Stop lying. Its LISTED on a site somewhere, but its NOT available. You can click it, send money and wait till November, thats not selling, thats pre ordering.

      How is he lying? I've got my Raspberry Pi in my hands, so it is available today. The fact that you hyave a long waiting period doesn't mean that it's not available

    13. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      I agree there, its not "available". You can order it, but it has to be procued first, the people before you in line will have to get theirs, and so it won't be shipped in quite some time.

    14. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by horza · · Score: 1

      When you order a couch, you can wait a couple of months before you finally take delivery. If you order, and they make it clear you will take delivery in November, then the terms and conditions are clear. If your shopping experience is limited to throwing things into a trolley at Walmart then this may be difficult to understand, but this kind of thing is not uncommon in the real world.

      Phillip.

    15. Re:Highest bang-per-buck ratio of any SoC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I eventually got mine. But let's be honest, they really should have just farmed out real, grown-up production from the beginning.

  5. Cue! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Cue the "it sucks", "why bother", "too expensive" whinges.

    *looks up*

    Oh, too late. Already started.

    1. Re:Cue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct form of "cue"? You're one of them fancy-pants college boys, aren't you?

  6. Yay! by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    A Raspberry pie article! I haven't seen one in days, already had withdrawal symptoms.

    That said, I'm still trying to order one. WTF? They were supposed to be readily available this week.
    After a long time on the waiting list, element14 still gives me the "Real Soon Now!" message.

    1. Re:Yay! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      A Raspberry pie article! I haven't seen one in days, already had withdrawal symptoms.

      How do you tell? Is the victim curled up in a Pi shape?

    2. Re:Yay! by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      You have to pre-register.
      After a while you'll get an email with an order code you can use on the website.
      I did it when the Rpi was announced and got the email a few weeks later.

      I was really busy at the time, so I ignored the email and forgot about it.
      Until two weeks ago, when I decided to follow through with the order. They're expecting to send it "within 10 weeks", which frankly is a lot, but not unexpected.

      I'm going to attach an external USB drive to it and set it up in a remote location to serve as a remote backup and a private proxy server (different country, could be useful).

  7. Master & Archimedes models next please by drunkahol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Loving my Model B Pi, but can't help thinking that there's a niche wanting filled for systems that can actually function as a near normal desktop. Something with more grunt, more RAM etc. My phone is a quad core ARM CPU, why not a system a little larger than the Pi for the older audience who remember the Model B, Master & Archimedes the first time round. We have the cashflow and desire to use.
    (just don't make an Electron version - even if it has Plus 1 and Plus 3 expansion modules like I had back in the day!)

    D

    1. Re:Master & Archimedes models next please by ReeceTarbert · · Score: 2

      Loving my Model B Pi, but can't help thinking that there's a niche wanting filled for systems that can actually function as a near normal desktop. Something with more grunt, more RAM etc.

      What about nettops, then? Okay, they cost more than the Raspberry PI, but you get a fairly decent, low power and small footprint desktop computer that can run your OS of choice while being a more than competent HTPC.

      For what it's worth, I've been using a ZOTAC ZBOX HD-AD01 for more than one year as my main computer (while much more capable hardware is mostly gathering dust) and just the other day Tom's Hardware compared seven of them in great detail.

      RT.

    2. Re:Master & Archimedes models next please by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me the Pi people may be working on this already.
      But if they were what would happen if they told people about it? Would they get told off again for announcing a product before it is ready? Would next time they wait until they have a few tens of thousand made before releasing them?

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  8. Re:POS by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    While crass, the grandparent post is arguably a worthwhile question when you compare the Model A to the Model B.

    $10 for ethernet and a second USB port is a smaller premium(and, of course, better integrated) than pretty much any peripheral option, and some sort of networking is an extremely convenient feature. The 'A' seems like a very niche sort of device.

  9. Re:POS by adisakp · · Score: 1

    This "crippled piece of shit" can, among thousands of other things, run XBMC and output 1080p video, turning and dumb TV into a smartTV. Not too shabby for $25.

    Yeah but for $10 more, you can have one with Ethernet and an extra USB port. Really is $35 too much for a computer nowdays?

  10. Re:hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, either that, uncritical 3D printer fanboyism or delusional Space Nuttery.

  11. USB power limited by polyfuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For the love of glorb I hope the Model A has bigger polyfuses on the USB ports than 140mA. No USB WiFi adapter works with under 200+mA of power so let's hope that has been considered.

  12. Re:POS by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $10 for ethernet and a second USB port is a smaller premium(and, of course, better integrated) than pretty much any peripheral option, and some sort of networking is an extremely convenient feature. The 'A' seems like a very niche sort of device.

    I think most nerds will want the model-B, but note that if you stick a WiFi dongle in the single USB port of a model-A, you do still have a fully network accessible device... but likely it'll be easier to do development for that using a model-B. The main "wins" for the model-A are (1). it costs less, and (2). I believe power consumption is quite a bit lower.... I seem to recall seeing a video where Eben indicated that the networking/usb-hub chip uses quite a lot of power on the model-B.

  13. No, it's not easy by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's easy to forget that the Raspberry Pi currently shipping is the more expensive model of the board.

    No, it's not easy - because Slashdot reminds us of every trivial thing about the Raspberry Pi on a daily basis.

    1. Re:No, it's not easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please continue doing so /.

    2. Re:No, it's not easy by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Dude this is Slashdot. Frankly I would rather see stories like this then all the political crap that they are pushing these days. I suggest that you take a look back to the good old days.
      http://web.archive.org/web/19990125103314/http://www.slashdot.org/
      And http://web.archive.org/web/19981111190256/http://slashdot.org/
      For examples of the roots of Slashdot. Oh and you have got to love this.
      "Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... " "
      As I sit with a 32 gig microSD card in my phone... Have we become jaded to the wonders around us?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  14. Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by Luthair · · Score: 0

    Earlier this week I received an email from one of the distribution partners to tell me they were accepting orders, fortunately I noticed during the checkout process that shipping costs "couldn't be determined" at that point and would be tacked on later, mucking around with their shipping calculator it appeared that their cheapest rate is $18 or over 50% of the cost of the Pi.

    1. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by nightfell · · Score: 1

      it appeared that their cheapest rate is $18 or over 50% of the cost of the Pi.

      Really, *that's* your complaint? That the Raspberry Pi is so inexpensive that a sub-$20 international shipping rate is too high relative to the price of the device for your liking?

    2. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by mirix · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty reasonable complaint. For my situation, shipping is $12 through newark.

      35 + 12, + tax.. pretty much 50 bucks. A bit of a stretch from the semi-disposable-25-dollar-PC meme.

      I get pi sized parcels from china all the time for $5 *including* the bloody contents, so $18 for something that size is ridiculous. Even ignoring the fact that it nearly doubles the price - If a pi was $200 I'd still feel bad spending $18 on shipping.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this isn't 1997. I've had computer cases shipped for half that and many online stores offer free shipping on orders around this amount on items significantly heavier (e.g. books).

    4. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I get pi sized parcels from china all the time for $5 *including* the bloody contents

      Exactly - those aren't worth pilfering.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If I order a $35 gadget from dealextreme they often mark it signature required, but I still get free shipping from China.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Distributer Shipping Still Too Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is a Raspberry Pi, unless your a geek.

  15. Model A vs. Model B - History Repeats Itself by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Informative
    Seems like history repeating itself here. As Slashdotters may know, the "Model A" and "Model B" designations are a homage to the two original versions of the BBC Micro. In that case (as Braben himself will be aware!), the more powerful Model B was by far the more popular of the two despite its higher cost. The "BBC B 32K" became the canonical version of the computer, with the Model A little more than a footnote.

    So is this the same situation we're seeing here?

    (just don't make an Electron version - even if it has Plus 1 and Plus 3 expansion modules like I had back in the day!)

    Yes... given that the Acorn Electron- intended as a cut-down "home" version of the BBC Micro- was a flop (*) that led to Acorn being taken over, that would probably be A Bad Thing. Also, as far as I know, the Electron was pretty underpowered and needed those add-on modules for any "serious" expansion.

    (*) Sort of- apparently what happened was that there *was* quite high demand for it, but they had problems with the custom ULA chip and couldn't get enough out in time for Christmas. By the time they had the problem sorted out in the New Year, those potential customers had bought rival machines instead and Acorn were left with warehouses full of unsold Electrons.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Model A vs. Model B - History Repeats Itself by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      So is this the same situation we're seeing here?

      Had they gone with the original plan of having half the ram on the model A compared to the model B I would have thought so.

      But they decided a while back to put the same ammount of ram on both. That leaves us in a situation where the core hardware that is important to software developers is the same between both models, the only difference is whether or not the USB hub with ethernet is present.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  16. American Spoken Here (English Misunderstood) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha.The American language forked from 'English' in 1776. Any mutual intelligibility is purely coincidental! :)

    If I had mod points, that comment's score would be going up.

  17. Strewth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American language forked from 'English' in 1776.

    Bloody oath it did - bonzer, Bruce!

  18. Re:oh boy by jon3k · · Score: 2

    Would love to see some realistic options if you've got em. Something for the average human that can throw a pre-built linux distro onto an SD card and be off and running. Seriously, not trolling, I've been pining over a raspberry pi forever and I'd love to see some other options.

  19. Someone set up us the bomb. by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2

    C'mon people, has All Your Base Are Belong to Us slipped from the Slashdot lexicon?

  20. You all started somewhere. by ax25-ack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the project is a good one. I cut my teeth on an on sale TS-1000 from a catalog store Montgomery Wards that had it on closeout for $35.00. Call me stupid, but the hours I spend mashing the membrane keyboard learning every last bit of the z-80 and what it could do still serves me well!

  21. Re:hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, lets just not report the news just because some people don't like the subject! What a great idea!

  22. Re:POS by MadCow42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm using the RPi to drive a prototype device that I'm building. Currently it's just driving two real-time stepper motors (or close to real time), and doing a great job of it. For our production device though, we don't need Ethernet, and only want/need one USB - so the $10 savings and lower power consumption is perfect.

    As for why we'd use an off-the-shelf board? Why not - it does everything we need, runs an off-the-shelf operating system, and is easy to program/update/use.

    Why re-invent the wheel when we have areas where we can get a lot more value out of our time. As you seem to support - it's a great board!

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  23. Re:Vaporware by master_kaos · · Score: 1

    and you are also an idiot.

  24. Re:POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using the RPi to drive a prototype device that I'm building. Currently it's just driving two real-time stepper motors (or close to real time), and doing a great job of it. For our production device though, we don't need Ethernet, and only want/need one USB - so the $10 savings and lower power consumption is perfect.

    As for why we'd use an off-the-shelf board? Why not - it does everything we need, runs an off-the-shelf operating system, and is easy to program/update/use.

    Why re-invent the wheel when we have areas where we can get a lot more value out of our time. As you seem to support - it's a great board!

    MadCow.

    Why isn't modded up?

  25. Re:oh boy by hamster_nz · · Score: 2

    A bit harsh... I've got a RPi, cost NZ$53 (US$40ish).including shipping. and 15% tax, so US$36.90 before tax.

    Works a bit better than the other ARM boards I've got (the software support is really crap on some no-brander ARM boards).

    I've managed to use the GPIO pins for simple stuff too (e.g. with a LVTTL serial to USB) without frying them.

  26. Re:POS by citizenr · · Score: 1

    This "crippled piece of shit" can, among thousands of other things, run XBMC and output 1080p video, turning and dumb TV into a smartTV. Not too shabby for $25.

    Only if you use one codec. No Xvid/mpeg2 etc.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  27. Re:POS by petermgreen · · Score: 2

    Two reasons

    1: two USB ports isn't really quite enough, I want enough ports to have a keyboard, a mouse and a USB flash drive plugged in at once.
    2: i've had more trouble with the SMSC chip used on the Pi than with other USB ethernet chips

    So i'd rather have a model A and pair it with http://cpc.farnell.com/1/1/56475-hub-3x-usb-ethernet-blkgrey-psg90189.html. Total cost is about the same when you consider that the USB hub with ethernet comes with a PSU that can supply the Pi (they don't mention that in the description but i've bought several and it comes with a 5V 2.5A power supply).

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  28. Re:POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Why isn't modded up?

    He forgot to sign with the 42, must be a robotic impostor cow pod, gone mad.

  29. Re:oh boy by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    if 50 bucks is expensive maybe you should be saving up to pay for rent rather than buying toy computers.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  30. Re:Vaporware by BlueLightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rubbish. Mine was one of the original orders and it has been fulfilled already. A friend also ordered well after the launch day and has received hers too.

    Next...

  31. Re:hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My God, it's almost as if Slashdot are posting articles that a large proportion of it's readership might actually be interested in. The bastards!

  32. Re:POS by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    You could but then you may need a USB hub as well.
    If you are going to use it as a small PC you will want wifi and a keyboard which works out to two USBs
    If you want to use it with XBMC you may need a second USB to add blue tooth, or an IR receiver.
    or you could always use a smartphone running this http://code.google.com/p/android-xbmcremote/ for a remote.
    Of course that is for the minimal hackers out there.
    Now if one wants to really get into the spirit of things you can add and SPI Wifi module like this http://www.cutedigi.com/wireless/wifi/wifi-module-with-spi-interface-to-8-bit-mcu-zg2100mc-wishield.html
    And then an IR module to the UART on the GPIO http://www.lirc.org/receivers.html for a complete XBMC solution.
    That would leave the USB port free for a card reader, USB memory stick, or Bluetooth adaptor.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  33. Re:POS by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Yep and if you are getting into the sprit of things you can add your own Wifi using the SPI interface and then make an PS/2 interface with the GPIO for your old PS/2 mouse and keyboard.
    Over all that extra $10 for the Ethernet and USB hubs isn't bad but it nice to have the even cheaper option available for those that want it.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  34. Re:POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you own one?

  35. Raspberry Pi Model C? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the next spec of Raspberry Pi? Cortex-A15, HDMI 1.3/1.4, GL 4.x/ES 2.x 3D Graphics, on chip Linux/IC, expandable RAM IC 16/32 Gigabyte, replaceable/upgradable ICs, miniXT form factor etc?

  36. Re:POS by donutface · · Score: 1

    This "crippled piece of shit" can, among thousands of other things, run XBMC and output 1080p video, turning and dumb TV into a smartTV. Not too shabby for $25.

    Only if you use one codec. No Xvid/mpeg2 etc.

    I haven't tested with any 1080p DivX files, but the Pi plays SD DivX/XviD content without a sweat. I think this should comfortably play the majority of videos you throw at it.

  37. Re:hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a real product. It has shipped and is continuing to ship. You're not only wrong about your 'space nuttery' obsession, you're wrong about this. Your track record is looking pretty dismal.