Slashdot Mirror


Why Were So Many "Crazy" Higgs Boson Stories Published?

The presumed discovery of the Higgs boson may be one of the most important scientific discoveries ever, but it did bring out quite a bit of "strange" science reporting. In addition to blogs, many mainstream news sites jumped on the crazy headline bandwagon. The ability to soon travel at the speed of light, the building of a Star Trek style transporter, and many stories of the particle proving God doesn't exist have made the rounds in the past week. Is the particle's discovery just on the fringe of common scientific knowledge and therefore prone to wild speculation, or does this all come down to having the most sensational headline?

34 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Invitation to San Francisco Higgs Boson Party by E1910 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let me steal this first post to invite fellow slashdotters to a Higgs Boson Scientists Launch Party next weekend in San Francisco. We have friendly people, interesting discussions and huge orgy. Everyone is welcome to come! WOOOHOOO

    1. Re:Invitation to San Francisco Higgs Boson Party by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and huge orgy. Everyone is welcome to come! WOOOHOOO

      I'd love to be a fly on the wall when the neckbeards who rated this entry as informative show up for the "orgy".

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  2. Seriously? by Anrego · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The exact same reasons we read headlines about creating universe eating black holes when the thing started up.. about global pandemics that are going to wipe us all out.. about “Africanized” bees. It gets eyeball time, which is what it’s all about.

    “A long held theory has been possibly confirmed”

    Vs.

    “THE FUTURE IS HERE, LIVE LIKE THE JETSONS IN 5 YEARS!”

    One of those is going to sell a _lot_ more toothpaste.

    1. Re:Seriously? by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the age of Adsense. All that matters is traffic. Some will do whatever it takes to get it. I see traffic grabs all the time, but most people don't realize how much money is in it.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  3. Where were they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't see any articles like that, are you confusing random small blogs for mainstream news sites? Or was this an American news thing?

    1. Re:Where were they? by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try the BBC: "The Higgs boson is another nail in the coffin of religion", "What do you get if you divide science by God?", "Is there room for Higgs Boson & Religion?"
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-radio-and-tv-18712238
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7955846.stm
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00tt7kb/World_Have_Your_Say_WHYS_60_Is_there_room_for_Higgs_Boson_and_Religion/

    2. Re:Where were they? by ratbag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair to our beloved Beeb, none of those links point to "hard news" pages. They're either from the magazine section (a bit like the op-ed section of a paper) or a "balanced" current affairs program where one uninformed talking head berates another one for 30 minutes and noone emerges from the program any the wiser.

    3. Re:Where were they? by irenaeous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you read the linked article? As a Christian, I rolled my eyes most at the BBC radio headline, "The Higgs boson is another nail in the coffin of religion." This seems like an equal opportunity attempt to offend. It attacks religion, but with an argument that is so stupid that it ought to offend atheists too who might be associated with such asininity. And this is the BBC who you think wouldn't do this kind of thing.

    4. Re:Where were they? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Or was this an American news thing?"

      If you RTFA, you'll see that the first two examples cited were from Canada's National Post and the BBC.

      Well sure, but had he RTFA'd, he wouldn't have gotten to do any American-bashing, now would he?

      Not sure which is worse: AC's who only post anti-American nonsense, or the idiots who mod such posts Insightful... Hating on Americans must be trending.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  4. Re:Could be... by rilles · · Score: 5, Funny

    As an atheist, I cannot accept the existence of a god particle. Now if you call it the particle known as 42, then I'm good.

  5. Re:What the Higgs confirmation means by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing goes faster than C


    (besides assembly, but who does assembly?)

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  6. Because Lederman nicknamed it "the god particle" by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Informative

    And journalists are morons.

  7. God particle by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Calling Higgs boson "The God Particle" is probably the greatest marketing decision in the history of science.

    1. Re:God particle by PPH · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wasn't the decision of the physicists. Leon Lederman originally wanted to title his book the goddamn particle, but the publisher wouldn't allow it.

      Peter Higgs isn't happy with the name either.

      Slashdot editors could do the world service by revising the name to its original whenever it appears here. Perhaps the rest of the world will pick up on the change.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Re:Because Lederman nicknamed it "the god particle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it comes to quantum physics, almost everyone is a moron.

  9. Seriously. Check out this crazy: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/opinion/sunday/q-and-a-the-higgs-boson-and-you.html

    ...

    Q. Will the discovery affect everyday life?

    A. Well, duhhh.

    Q. Hey, I’m not a science-y person, O.K.?

    A. Sorry. The answer is absolutely. Sort of. Well, yes and no.

    Q. Can you be like a little more specific?

    A. For starters, you’re going to be hearing the phrase “Higgs boson” about 800 trillion times. You’ll be at a cocktail party talking about the Kardashians and someone will say, “OMG, Higgs boson!” and you’ll go, “No, no, no — please, no more with the Higgs boson.” So there’s that. Plus this Halloween, every other trick-or-treater is going to be dressed as — guess what? — the Higgs boson. What else? Ten bucks says Al Gore claims he discovered it. Another 10 says Mitt Romney picks it as his running mate. Romney-Higgs boson. Dream ticket. So, yes, it’s going to affect your everyday life. My advice? Deal with it.

    Don't even try to read the rest of it, unless you like wasting your time.

    Based on this famous quote:

    “Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.” -Eleanor Roosevelt

    That would put this sort of annoying Higgs boson chatter squarely in the realm of average minds.

    They can usually come up with something good to say about events most of us understand. But they can't understand the Higgs boson. Doesn't matter: the media is all about generating copy, this is the highest imperative. Making sense is secondary. And so not understanding doesn't prevent them from trying to say something. Nor should it, according to the logic of their profession, since the logic of their profession says the editorial has to be filed on time, the column must fit so many square inches of space, the front page must have timely links about today's news.

    And so they all come up with this WHARRGARBL like the NY Times story above. Welcome to the media industry.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Seriously. Check out this crazy: by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And so they all come up with this WHARRGARBL like the NY Times story above.

      It was in the Opinion section, written by a prolific satirist. Can't take a joke, can you?

  10. The science is above the heads of many folks by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wanted to be a theoretical physicist when I grew up (oh, childhood dreams) and I've got an above average understanding of particle physics just from my general fascination with the subject. Even I have a tough time grasping the nitty gritty details of the Higgs field. The sensationalism stems from 1. The general population not understanding particle physics and 2. The general population not understanding the nature of the announcement. The Higgs wasn't so much discovered as it was confirmed to be exactly where we expected it to be all along. No new technology will come out of this so much as our understanding of the universe has been strengthened considerably - we're on the right track with the Standard Model after all.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  11. Re:Not mutually exclusive. by Kelbear · · Score: 3, Informative

    I like to try to stay reasonably well-informed relative to the general population, but I still needed about 2 hours of looking up summary articles and digging through wikipedia entries to make any goddamn sense of what was actually discovered, and what importance it has to progress in physics research. My highschool science classes never discussed anything below the atomic level. I had absolutely no awareness of where the Higgs Boson was theoretically supposed to fit into the "Standard Model" since I'd never even heard of the Standard Model either.

    Pretty sure the vast majority of the population still has no clue what the Higgs Boson hullaballoo entails. It's easy for misinformation to propagate on this subject because the audience has virtually no context.

  12. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm waiting for the one-time-application tooth-enamel-protector we will surely have in 5 years thanks to the discovery of the Higgs!

    You know, I'd be happy with just a new way of getting a cleaning.

    We put men on the moon. We can remove an internal organ through an incision smaller than a Kennedy half-dollar. We've discovered the Higgs Bosun. So why the FUCK are dental hygienists still using techniques clearly dreamed up and perfected by friggin' Torquemada?!

  13. Re:Because Lederman nicknamed it "the god particle by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everybody is actually both a moron and a genius at the same time, until observed.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Re:Because Lederman nicknamed it "the god particle by Necroman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wish I has karma to give you, as I was coming to say the same thing.

    The wikipedia entry on the Higgs Boson has some quotes from the author who nicknamed the Higgs Boson "the god particle":

    While use of this term may have contributed to increased media interest, many scientists dislike it, since it is sensational and overstates the particle's importance. Its discovery would still leave unanswered questions about the unification of quantum chromodynamics, the electroweak interaction, and gravity, as well as the ultimate origin of the universe. Higgs, an atheist himself, is displeased that the Higgs particle is nicknamed the "God particle", because the term "might offend people who are religious".

    Lederman said he gave it a nickname because the particle is "so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive," and added that he chose "the God particle" because "the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing."

    I understand he did it so his book had a catchy title, but the media decided to go crazy when talking about it. Sure, it's a big discovery to physicists and understanding how our universe works, it really shouldn't be receiving the coverage it's getting. There is just too many ignorant reporters trying to explain something, which is creating a lot of mis-information.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  15. Two words by k(wi)r(kipedia) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Journalism sucks. But let me qualify. Science journalism and journalism in general suck when they're written to beat the deadline in attempt to be "fresh" or "hot off the press" (conference). You can picture the reporter emailing his or her story to the editorial department and the editor, finding the report, a bit dull decides to sex it up just a little, adding "factoids" lifted from Google or Wikipedia (the two not being mutually exclusive) or making snappy generalizations that can reduce to two or three words WTF the whole event is about.

    Let's be honest, which would you rather read: "God particle may explain creation" or "CERN scientists discover new subatomic particle"?

    A common trick in newspaper headlines is to give off the impression of certainty where there is none. When you read something like "500 feared dead" the day after a disaster, you can be sure that the "500" is an approximation that most likely came from some random bloke or bureaucart.

    Wait a few more weeks or months, and the science reporting will get more sober.

    1. Re:Two words by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't read most science journalism anymore. It's too infuriating. Following the exploration of the Higgs particle, I've going to Professor Matt Strassler's blog http://profmattstrassler.com/ where he has gone over a good many of the issues in reasonably easy to follow language. Since he's at CERN, he's well placed to write sensible articles on the matter.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. Re:Could be... by scubamage · · Score: 3, Funny

    I propose we rename the Higgs Boson "the spaghetti particle" or "the noodley particle" or to be truly sensational, "the pirate particle." Though I do suppose that "the invisible pink particle" would also be appropriate.

  17. Re:What the Higgs confirmation means by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Funny

    Learn to assembly.

  18. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by Anrego · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone with a lot of dental problems.. so much this.

    I mean there is a lot of advancements in the dental industry.. composite fillings, implants, etc.. but some stuff is just conspicuously primitive. Maybe there really is no better way than physically scraping the junk off with metal picks.. or maybe it's impractical for whatever reason.

    Personally I'd like to see one of these nifty painless numbing methods I've been hearing about as "just around the corner" since I was in high school to actually show up at my dentists office. Metal picks I don't mind.. my dentist trying to directly freeze my brain stem or something with a needle the size of a drinking straw and then STILL feeling it kinda gets on the nerves..

  19. Re:Why? by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Funny

    Higgs-Boson Party at my house! Beer! Party hats! Quantum Physics! Whooo!

    ...I'm uncertain about Quantum Physics...

    That is just her stripper name.

  20. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least the dental hygenists are still hot.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  21. Somewhat Boring: Our model predicted it correctly by Theovon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First of all, what was found is a particle with the same MASS as that predicted by the standard model. They haven't yet confirmed spin or other properties. But what this amounts to is confirmation of what was already suspected. Unfortunately, this isn't all that helpful, because we already know that the standard model doesn't predict everything correctly. If we hadn't found the Higgs Boson, then perhaps it would have helped us to fix the standard model. As it is, this can't help us improve the standard model. In other words, this is great, and it's nice to know that brilliant scientists in the past century were right, but it isn't any kind of revolutionary progress.

  22. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of them..

    Consistently..

    Seriously what the hell is with that. Not that I'm complaining, but that can't just be a coincidence.

  23. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    More Novacaine!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  24. Re:Not mutually exclusive. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's why lots of sites had articles like this.

    If you ignored the obvious idiot sites, I thought the general reaction to the Higgs Boson was pretty good. Idiot sites like ABC, CBC, MSNBC and CNN.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  25. Re:I'm postponing buying toothpaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe hot women start torchering people in high school and start to enjoy so much that they gravitate towards professions were they get to continue that... ;^)