Slashdot Mirror


Why Ultra-Efficient 4,000 mph Vacuum-Tube Trains Aren't Being Built

cylonlover writes "In the 1800s, when pneumatic tubes shot telegrams and small items all around buildings and sometimes small cities, the future of mass transit seemed clear: we'd be firing people around through these sealed tubes at high speeds. And it turns out we've got the technology to do that today – mag-lev rail lines remove all rolling friction from the energy equation for a train, and accelerating them through a vacuum tunnel can eliminate wind resistance to the point where it's theoretically possible to reach blistering speeds over 4,000 mph (6,437 km/h) using a fraction of the energy an airliner uses – and recapturing a lot of that energy upon deceleration. Ultra-fast, high efficiency ground transport is technologically within reach – so why isn't anybody building it? This article looks into some of the problems."

14 of 625 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Funny

    If man was meant to fly, he'd have been born with wings.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  2. vacuum trains?! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    this idea sucks

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  3. Vacuum-Tube Trains by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    They do have a warmer more 'natural' sound

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  4. Re:Ultra-efficient first post by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not half as think as you drunk I am.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  5. Re:The only answer for the USA by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the mile-low club.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  6. Re:Related questions... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do hot dogs come in packages of 10 but hot-dog rolls in packages of 8?

    Two for Fido.

  7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And if man wasn't meant to have sex with sheep then God wouldn't have made them so damn sexy!

  8. Re:Why? by thedonger · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  9. Re:The only answer for the USA by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the mile-low club.

    Technically its the "mile per second club".

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  10. MPH by MRe_nl · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Miles per hobo".

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  11. Re:Simple by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite thing about slashdot is all the people that assume that if they can't solve a problem by the time they post a comment, the problem is unsolvable.

    Have you ever heard of airlocks?

  12. Re:Maybe because... by kheldan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Never mind leaky tunnels, what about leaky cars? I can see the headline now:
    Mach 10 Train Arrives At Station, All Passengers Dead From Exposure To Vacuum

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  13. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Outside of heavily subsidized metro area trains, I have not seen a train compete with the cost, let alone the time and convenience of driving alone."

    I think Top Gear (completely unbiased) has proven time and time again that, up against all other forms of transportation, the car always wins.

  14. Re:Maybe because... by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 3, Funny

    I went to find the six pack in my fridge but there wasn't one. You shouldn't play with people like that. I really wanted a beer too...

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.