Entrepreneur Offers Crowdfunding For Health Startups, Including His Own
awjourn writes "As the SEC hashes out the final rules for crowdfunding equity investments in startups, one NYC entrepreneur is jumping into an industry that popular crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter won't go anywhere near: health. His company, MedStartr, launched July 11 with six companies seeking to raise money from the crowd for their health products and services. Among them, EndoGoddess, an app diabetics can use to track their blood sugar. Even MedStartr wants to raise funding on MedStartr. But will crowdfunding fly in healthcare, and more importantly, will regulators at the FDA and SEC be on board with it?"
I mean you can kickstart anything right?
It seems you can not. FTFA:
They don't fit into the guidelines. In specific, health care service providers aren't:
"Art, Comics, Dance, Design, Fashion, Film, Food, Games, Music, Photography, Publishing, Technology, and Theater."
So that's why there are so many Kickstarter spinoffs.
will regulators at the FDA ... be on board with it?
What does the FDA care where the money came from? That's not their job. The FDA is there to make sure that the end product is safe and effective, they shouldn't care who paid for the development of it.
I can see the SEC caring, because I'm sure that there are some clever little accounting tricks that violate the letter, spirit, or both, of their rules designed for more conventional forms of investment; but what possible interest would the FDA have in the accounting structure of the company bringing a device/drug/whatever before them?
The FDA certainly has its own set of Things It Takes Seriously; but those largely concern testing. Aside from, incidentally, testing a company's ability to stick it out long enough to make it through the approval process, does the FDA even pay attention to that stuff?
i can't link to the url, because i can only find these guidelines from the edit screen for my kickstarter project (see my sig), but there is a lot you cannot kickstart:
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it