Canadian Supreme Court Entrenches Tech Neutrality In Copyright Law
An anonymous reader writes "Last week, a Canadian Supreme Court decision attracted
attention for reduced copyright fees for music and
video. Michael Geist has a detailed analysis that concludes
there are two bigger, long term effects. First, Canada has
effectively now adopted
fair use. Second, the Supreme Court has made technological
neutrality a foundational
principle of Canadian copyright. The technological neutrality
principle could have an enormous long-term impact on Canadian
copyright, posing a threat to some copyright collective tariff
proposals and to the newly enacted digital lock rules."
In Canada, does their Supreme Court make laws? Or did the court just interpret an existing law which will be quickly altered to void this inconvenient decision?
If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine