Richard Stallman Speaks About UEFI
An anonymous reader writes "Despite weaknesses in the Linux-hostile 'secure boot' mechanism, both Fedora and Ubuntu decided to facilitate it, by essentially adopting two different approaches. Richard Stallman has finally spoken out on this subject. He notes that 'if the user doesn't control the keys, then it's a kind of shackle, and that would be true no matter what system it is.' He says, 'Microsoft demands that ARM computers sold for Windows 8 be set up so that the user cannot change the keys; in other words, turn it into restricted boot.' Stallman adds that 'this is not a security feature. This is abuse of the users. I think it ought to be illegal.'"
But I couldn't boot into my OS.
That's only because the bad guys look at what he fears for some good ideas.
Now if only RMS had've patented his ideas :)
Deathfromsomewhere's law states: sooner or later in any discussion, someone will commit an ad hominem attack when he runs out of useful arguments.
It is a fallacy. Too bad if you don't like it.
-1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
all the way to the death camps
You know, using a slippery slope argument is a shockingly bad way to convince someone that a slippery slope isn't a logical fallacy. Just saying.
-1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
FTFY. The root key wants to be found.
arrrh! Deep in the Microsoft dungeons lies the one true key. Guarded by deadly traps, ancient trolls and "things" of utter darkness. Find it and the tablets will be yours, but beware of the guardians of Redmond and their wrath.
Socialism != Death Camps. That's Fascism or Dictatorships you're thinking of. There are many mildly socialist countries on the planet today, and none of them have death camps - not even mild ones.
-- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain