Slashdot Mirror
Apple Wins Mobile Patent On Displaying Lists, Documents
walterbyrd writes "Apple yesterday was granted Patent no. 8,223,134 for 'Portable electronic device, method, and graphical user interface for displaying electronic lists and documents.' According to the patent's description, the technology relies upon a touch-screen display and includes both the function for displaying lists and documents, and how they look on a mobile product."
I don't quite see the business model of filing an idiotically general patent, waiting around, suing someone for using it, spending millions defending it in court, and getting the patent thrown out and paying the competitor's legal fees.
We (U.S. citizens) do, and we should be telling our congresscritters that this has to stop.
________ with a touch interface! Patent awarded!
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
You've wasted time in your life that you'll never get back... "Hopefully soon to be" is not "is"... try speaking to the current congressperson...
You mean continue talking to the guys that routinely ignore their constituents, lie to us in the face of obvious factual contradictions, and only listen to those throwing hookers, bags of cash, and coke at them?
That's worked so well so far, hasn't it?
The definition of insanity comes to mind.
Toss all incumbents out. Demand term limits. Eliminate career politicians.
Strat
Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
And what is wrong with hating the hateful player that plays the hateful game? Apple has gone out of its way to make itself perfectly hateful so I for one must comply.
Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
Okay, so your soon-to-be congress-woman candidate gets elected and becomes a real congress-woman
What she agrees to do now?
I mean, what can you expect _anyone_ in the Congress to do, while the USPO is protected by corporations, patent trolls, and the lawyer union?
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Toss all incumbents out. Demand term limits. Eliminate career politicians.
Be careful what you wish for -- there's no reason to expect that the replacement politicians would be any less corrupt than the current ones, and every reason to expect that none of them would know what the hell they were doing for the first year of their first term in office. The result would be a completely dysfunctional government after every election.
The goal shouldn't simply be to have new representatives, the goal should be to have good representatives. And the way to get good representatives is to change the electoral system so that the path to getting elected isn't "raise the most money", but rather "best represent the views of the largest number of constituents". Only then will have you have politicians who are motivated to listen to people rather than to money.
I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
Toss all incumbents out. Demand term limits. Eliminate career politicians.
Because of course anyone who replaces them will spring from the forehead of Athena, walk on water then turn it into wine, poop vanilla ice cream, and give us all sweet fuzzy kittens to make us happy when we're sad.
Why not try to create a better informed electorate? One which understands that software patents deter competition and stifle innovation.
Who the fuck cares what it says? You shoud not be able to patent a god damn UI concept. I don't care how detailed the patent describes it. (I assume you are the same AC farther up, exclaiming how detailed the patent is, like that somehow fucking matters) ...ending rant before my BP spikes...
Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
Many of us do... the problem is the other "legal personhoods" speak louder and more frequently and with more money.
You shoud not be able to patent a god damn UI concept.
Indeed. Imagine somebody patenting the steering wheel of a car, or the order of the pedals, or the order of the gears. That would be ridiculous. You'd never be able to switch brands of car.
Now besides USER-interfaces, I think actually that one should not be able to patent interfaces in general. Because any patent in this area will block interoperability and, as a result, innovation.
If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
The result would be a completely dysfunctional government after every election.
If only we should be so lucky.
Then they deserve the government they get.
But what about the rest of us?
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever