Slashdot Mirror


Another Elon Musk Bet: Half of All Cars Built In 2032 Will Be Electric

New submitter cartechboy writes "Ears perked up when Elon Musk made another bold statement he'd be 'willing to bet on.' This time he says that in 20 years, half of all new cars sold would be plug-in electric cars. Believe him? The math looks a little fuzzy, and one research analyst is willing to take Musk up on the bet. 'It expects the U.S. plug-in market to grow at a 32-percent average rate from now through 2020. That takes sales to roughly 200,000 units in 2020. Even if that rate continued for another 12 years, which Hurst considers unlikely, that would only take plug-in cars to roughly one-third of the market in 2032, or about 5 million sales. But Hurst thinks 8 or 10 percent annual growth in plug-in sales is more reasonable, taking the total to 480,000 or 574,000 plug-ins sold in 2032 in the U.S.'"

4 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Before thinking Musk is a fool... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    2008 - The Tesla Roadster is a $110,000 (base price) sports car with a 244 mile range.
    2012 - The Tesla Model S is a $57,000 - $77,000 (base price) sedan with 160 - 300 mile range.
    2015 (estimated) - Tesla Gen III Sedans are targeting $30,000 base price with comparable Model S ranges.

    In addition, Tesla is rolling out a "supercharge" network to support changing away from home in convenient locations in target markets. The Model S has also been promised to include a 5-minute battery quick change option. Once that is available at (for instance) gas stations, it'll take as much time to refill your electric as it does to refill your gas car, except it'll cost a whole lot less.

    This guy is actually delivering functioning, functional electric cars and building the infrastructure to support them. I wouldn't bet against him; everyone who's done that so far has been proven wrong repeatedly.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  2. 50% is not necessarily a large number by erice · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If gasoline powered vehicles become cost prohibitive to operate and electric vehicles are still expensive, total sales may drop as people are economically forced out the market. "Plugin" vehicles (which include plug-in hybrids) could still be 50% of the (smaller) market.

    "Second, an oil price shock would have to drive gasoline prices to $8 or $10 a gallon"

    Are these guys kidding? If the global economy wasn't in such a precarious state, gas would be over $5/gallon *now*! In 2032, $10/gallon gas will be a fond memory.

  3. Re:I wanted to post this by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Assuming that's true, it means that a gas car is using the energy twice - once to refine the fuel, then again to use the fuel. At least the EV car is only using it once.

    The problem with petrol is not this anyway, it's that a) it's a finite resource and becoming scarcer, b) it's releasing CO2 that was sequestered over million sof years in a short timeframe and that doesn't seem to be a good idea by any measure, and c) it's a very inefficient use of the energy it embodies.

    If batteries could even get to half of the energy density of petrol, EVs would be a no-brainer. IC engines are really quite unsuitable for the task they are given.

  4. Re:I wanted to post this by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The amount of electricity required to travel a certain distance with an EV is roughly the same as the amount of electricity used to refine the gas for a regular vehicle that travels the same distance. According to DOE: http://gatewayev.org/how-much-electricity-is-used-refine-a-gallon-of-gasoline

    Fascinating link.

    Alas, it's carefully overlooking a few key details.

    One of which is that the energy of crude oil is in no way related to the electricity required to refine said crude oil.

    What they're actually making a guesstimate to is the amount of electricity that could have been generated INSTEAD of making the gasoline.

    And they're overestimating that by assuming that the making of electricity is 100% efficient.

    Which it's not, in case you were curious.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"