Slashdot Mirror


Trolling Al Qaeda... For Peace?

The Mister Purple writes "There is a small initiative underway to combat Islamic militant recruiting on the Internet... by trolling them. Quoting the article: 'The program, called Viral Peace, seeks to occupy the virtual space that extremists fill, one thread or Twitter exchange at a time. Shahed Amanullah, a senior technology adviser to the State Department and Viral Peace's creator, tells Danger Room he wants to use "logic, humor, satire, [and] religious arguments, not just to confront [extremists], but to undermine and demoralize them." Think of it as strategic trolling, in pursuit of geopolitical pwnage.' So, does this mean that I'm promoting peace when I post YouTube comments?"

12 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because pissing people off is an effective way to get them to leave you alone.

    1. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Confusion is a great tactic. Make them so mad they can't think straight, and you reduce their total effectiveness.

      See also political arguments, religious arguments, battle of the sexes, etc etc.

    2. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because pissing people off is an effective way to get them to leave you alone.

      It's not designed to work on the nuts, it's designed to work on the ones the nuts are trying to recruit.

      Making the nuts look like idiots hurts their recruiting.

    3. Re:Right by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But?!?!?

      If you disable Al Qaeda, how will you get them to overthrow Assad in Syria for Hillary?

      You must understand one thing. "Al Qaeda" never stopped being a board piece used by "Western" powers, when they were Reagan's Moral equivalent of our founding fathers."

      If you dispute this, it's because YOU have already been trolled into disinformed confusion...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Right by vivian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually I think if they just got laid once in a while it'd reduce their effectiveness. Unfortunately for them their belief system makes them think the only way it's going to happen is to get married or get martyred.
      Given their apparently poor respect of women, the former isn't likely without some kind of arranged marriage.

    5. Re:Right by kentrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know that trolling doesn't mean ridiculing someone?

      Trolling is a fine art, and often it means gaining someone's trust, and provoking an emotional reaction you want, but not necessarily drawing attention to yourself as the troll.

    6. Re:Right by lennier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I think that is it. There are too many wars due to lack of humiliation.

      Sadly if one were to rewatch most American movies aimed at teenagers since the 1980s, I think you'll find the predominant cultural moral message has been pretty much exactly that.

      Act 1: A young wimpy kid/cop/spy/soldiert is pushed around by bullies/criminals/Soviets/terrorists.
      Act 2: The bullies continue to push the wimp who is tragically plagued by common sense/compassion/robots. This nearly loses the lunch money/case/mission/Vietnam.
      Act 3: Pushed to the wall, the young wimp faces his/her deep inner fears of his/her own glorious American manifest destiny. Hoo-rah!
      Act 4: The former wimp utterly humiliates the enemy in the most embarrassing way possible with a devastating rock solo. This ends all wars everywhere and there is no such thing as blowback, at least until the sequel.

      I'm pretty sure that if this formula worked for Marty McFly and Rambo, it will work for the United States diplomatic corps.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    7. Re:Right by Crosshair84 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.

      These people are not blowing themselves up BECAUSE of their religion, that does play some part into it yes, but that is not the main driving reason. I paid attention in history class, I don't remember Muslims sending fire ships into New York Harbor in the 1880's. I don't remember suicide car bombings in the 1930's. I remember some piracy off their shores and that was about it. If religion was the DRIVING force we would have seen these past events, but we don't.

      The reason they attack us today is because for the last 50 years we have been meddling in their internal affairs. We have installed/propped up dictators who have brutalized and oppressed their people for decades. They know that until the US has been driven from the region they will not have self rule. The purpose of 9/11 was to get the US more deeply involved and more easily attacked. They have told us their goals repeatedly, bankrupt the US Soviet Union style to force it to leave the region forever.

      Why the suicide attacks? Because the US supported/influenced tyrants have made life so miserable that these people have nothing to lose. If they lined up as a regular army they know they would get slaughtered, so why not just go for a suicide attack and do far more damage. Either method ends in death. Self rule is worth dying for, so they make the very rational choice to sacrifice themselves for the future of their people to have the ability to rule themselves. If the roles were reversed you'd see Americans lining up around the corner to strap on the bomb belts for the same reasons and you and I would be cheering them on for their bravery.

  2. Waste of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it never worked on [Republicans, Democrats] (delete as per preference) so why should it work on fundies?

  3. or we can sharpen occams razor by nimbius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and do the obvious thing: stop bombing random countries in the middle east every four to eight years. Anyone whos read Osama Bin Ladens demand list knows that most of his argument is structured around the fact that we bomb indiscriminately most of the middle east, topple their governments, kill their nationals and foreign nationals with drones, prop up malevolent dictators and generally leave the countries we've "touched" a complete wreck. trolling for peace will be nearly as effective as the like button was for Kony2012.

    the state department understands quite well we need al quaeda in some form, hence a plan thats effectively designed to bolster recruitment. Without a boogeyman we have no pretext to assert regional dominance, and that would mean we would have to double down on our iran rhetoric and face whats largely believed to be a capable opponent in a war no one would support. Everything since the carter foreign policy doctrine has completely screwed this country into ensuring we pound the snot out of some unsuspecting foreign nation in the gulf once a presidency, its just that we're running out of little guys to fight that dont have big teeth, or allies that simply wont tolerate the action.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  4. Not trolling, counter-trolling by erice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think people reading too much into the description of the effort as "trolling".

    Trolling on Usenet and sites like Slashdot is about provoking people who are otherwise engaged in reasoned, rational, discussions into flaming.

    The Al Qaeda elements are presumably using weakly supported but not obviously wrong statements written to appeal to the emotions of would-be recruits and convince them that the irrational is reasonable. In other words, these elements are themselves trolling.

    The counter would be to either reveal the trolls as nut jobs or provoke them to revealing that themselves. Posting fictitious but not obviously wrong arguments yourself is probably not the way to go about this.

    1. Re:Not trolling, counter-trolling by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trolling on Usenet and sites like Slashdot is about provoking people who are otherwise engaged in reasoned, rational, discussions into flaming.

      Actually it's about pushing people's buttons, and it works best on people who take themselves waaay too seriously.

      You troll people who are inclined to jerk their knees, not those who are inclined toward reasoned, rational discussions.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade