Slashdot Mirror


EPIC Files Motion About Ignored Body Scanner Ruling

OverTheGeicoE writes "The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a motion in court yesterday regarding the court's ignored year-old ruling on EPIC vs. DHS. EPIC is asking the court to require DHS to start taking public comment within 60 days or, as an alternative, forbid DHS from using body scanners in primary airport screening altogether. If the court orders the latter, that would give EPIC what it originally sought in its lawsuit. Meanwhile, for what it's worth, the related petition on whitehouse.gov has a little more than half the signatures it needs to get an official 'response.' The signing period ends on August 9."

3 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Would you rather be blown-up by terrorists? by DeTech · · Score: 3, Funny

    molested every day for the rest of my life? Yes.

    I know some people who would pay for that.

  2. Re:Would you rather be blown-up by terrorists? by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and the passengers wary (and often pissed off) the only real chance a terrorist has...

    Dang...I never thought of that. TSA *IS* effective counter-terrorism, just not in the way I ever thought. They get the passengers pissed off before boarding the airplane, the more pissed off the better. Then, if someone *does* try to hijack or blow up an airliner in flight, the rest of the passengers, eager to vent their frustration on someone, ANYONE, rip the terrorist to shreds. Voila! Terrorism problem solved!

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  3. Re:LOL by Brain-Fu · · Score: 5, Funny

    So who voted for them?

    Diebold.