Slashdot Mirror
Medieval "Lingerie" From 15th Century Castle Could Rewrite Fashion History
fangmcgee writes "Archaeologists have unearthed several 500-year-old bras that some experts say could rewrite fashion history. While they'll hardly send pulses racing by today's standards, the lace-and-linen underpinnings predate the invention of the modern brassiere by hundreds of years. Found hidden under the floorboards of Lengberg Castle in Austria's East Tyrol, along with some 2,700 textile fragments and one completely preserved pair of (presumably male) linen underpants, the four intact bras and two fragmented specimens are thought to date to the 15th century, a hypothesis scientists later confirmed through carbon-dating."
I know a chick named Donna Matrix who goes for the whole Medieval Lingerie thing.
Tends more toward leather and chainmail than lace. Probably due to the crude manufacturing technology of the times.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
These aren't bras. They are medieval "sexist comments" left in the Da Vinci code.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Thou are speaketh in a comical form and manor. I say art thoueth a baffoon or comical jester?
You simply must continue on. Doesth thou produce plays? Pray tell where doest one sign up to get tickets? I wish to submit myself to thy whimsicle banter!
...that even in the 15th century, you still had to ensure you protected your washing line from underwear fetishists.....
Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
Karma: Chameleon
Why do women wear bras anyways? They don't need them. :P
I've always assumed it was to prevent them from slapping against their foreheads cartoonishly when running.
The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
Thou are speaketh in a comical form and manor. I say art thoueth a baffoon or comical jester?
You simply must continue on. Doesth thou produce plays? Pray tell where doest one sign up to get tickets? I wish to submit myself to thy whimsicle banter!
Art thou a foreigner still attempting to apprehend the vagaries of the English tongue?
Thy grammar is weak; though switchest betwixt second person singular and plural without reason, and though fabricatest idiomatic chimerae such as "thoueth" without regard for linguistic merit. Thy conjugation is often off: thou dost use the third person indicative form "speaketh" when thou speakest directly to a second person. Thine usage of helping verbs is often spurious, and thine orthological butcherings of "dost" and "doth" are most droll.
rage, rage against the dying of the light
0xB16B00B5