Slashdot Mirror


Japan: Police Arrest Journalists For Selling DVD-Backup Tools

Modellismo writes "Last week four journalists from Sansai Books were arrested for selling, through the company website, a copy of a magazine published last year (with a free cover mounted disc) focused on how to backup/rip DVDs. They violated Japan's Unfair Competition Prevention Law that recently has been revised to make illegal the sale of any DRM circumvention device or software. It's interesting to note that Japanese cyber police could arrest the Amazon Japan CEO, too, as the online giant is selling a lot of magazines, books and software packages for DVD copy and ripping: exactly what put Sansai Books' staff in trouble."

5 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. libdvdcss ilegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    wonder how many enbedded devices produced in japan have this little piece of code in them...

  2. Japan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only country who bows lower to corporations than the US of A.

    1. Re:Japan: by jrumney · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Parent would be correct, or at the very least it's a tie.

      It's not a tie. While a few very high profile sites like Pandora and NetFlix geoblock consumers from outside the US, most internet radio from the US is available worldwide. But try finding a Japanese internet radio station that plays music and is not blocked from outside Japan. Also, if you ever get the chance to watch the news on NHK Worldwide, witness how the entire sports segment of the news has the video replaced by a graphic stating "Due to rights issues, the video for this item is not available outside Japan", even though most of the sports being shown are local Japanese events that do not have rights holders outside of Japan to complain, and any other news channel is fine with showing short snippets of non-live sport, under fair use news reporting exceptions to whatever exclusive broadcast rights are in place for the sport.

  3. Re:Journalists? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are ways to dispute a law you disagree with. Disobeying it is usually not a good way.

    I disagree. Civil disobedience, historically speaking, is a very effective method to bring about political change. The founding of the U.S. itself is steeped in civil disobedience.

    The simple fact is, most people don't give a shit about injustice until it effects them personally. Civil disobedience brings it to their doorstep and forces them to acknowledge it. It took people occupying segregated lunch counters in the South before civil rights were really addressed 50 years ago, just as it took people occupying lower Manhattan to get wealth inequality really addressed today. Whether you agree with the protesters or not is irrelevant (and I'm really not interested in a bunch of ranting responses about the Occupy movement one way or the other, honestly); it forced those issues into the limelight. Mission: Accomplished.

  4. Re:Journalists? by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the point is, those without money should still get quality education, healthcare, and a chance at advancing themselves

    but current tax laws in the USA and American social policies advanced by the right are stratifying society, permanently

    meaning, if you are poor or middle class, you get inferior education, healthcare, and no chance to advance socioeconomically

    the point of life should be to better yourself. not to slave your entire life for someone who already has a lot of money, always will have a lot of money, never suffers for their crimes in the same way as the poor, and lives in a system rigged so that they, their children, and their grandchildren, can never possibly be poor. while those are poor, their children, and their grandchildren, are in such a rigged system they can never possibly be rich

    that's wealth inequality. a class society. that's where the USA is headed with the right wing republican political agenda

    the USA should be a MERITOCRACY. this is not what we have. what we have are country club boys complaining that the poor don't understand hard work, while they get a cushy job where they hardly exert any effort, just for chumming with the dad of their friend. meanwhile, the poor and middle class bust their ass, sometimes in two jobs, and live paycheck to paycheck, where the smallest of accidents or healthcare emergencies can ruin their entire lives

    THAT'S wealth inequality, and it is not a free society

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it