Finding Fault With Anti-Fracking Science Claims

A widely carried Associated Press article (here, as run by the Wall Street Journal) reports that some of the convincingly scientific-sounding claims of opponents of fracking don't seem to hold up to scrutiny. That's not to say that all is peaches: the article notes, for instance, that much of the naturally radioactive deep water called flowback forced up along with fracking-extracted gas "was once being discharged into municipal sewage treatment plants and then rivers in Pennsylvania," leading to concern about pollution of public water supplies. Public scrutiny and regulation mean that's no longer true. But specific claims about cancer rates, and broader ones about air pollution or other ills, are not as objective as they might appear to be, according to Duke professor Avner Vengosh and others. An excerpt: "One expert said there's an actual psychological process at work that sometimes blinds people to science, on the fracking debate and many others. 'You can literally put facts in front of people, and they will just ignore them,' said Mark Lubell, the director of the Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior at the University of California, Davis. Lubell said the situation, which happens on both sides of a debate, is called 'motivated reasoning.' Rational people insist on believing things that aren't true, in part because of feedback from other people who share their views, he said."

Comments

Common sense

[Anonymous Coward]

Dictates that whatever the oil industry want's to do, its probably wrong.

Re:Common sense

[Onuma]

Unfortunately, the trend of USG full and sub-departments completely shooting themselves in the foot is not uncommon.

Department of Energy makes us more foreign-energy dependent.
TSA makes airports less secure than ever, while also more inconvenient and congested than ever.
DEA is attempting to enforce the unenforceable. People want to get high - they're gonna get high! BATFE/DOJ is running guns to Mexican cartels and getting Mexicans and Americans killed in the process.

Basically, if you need a task done as inefficiently and back-assward as possible: hire the gov't!

Grant Money

[codepunk]

When grant money is on the line science will reflect whatever is required to ensure continued financial support.

Re:One Sided science

[cpu6502]

>>>Then perhaps you'd be well advised to start making formal scientific arguments in the peer-reviewed literature

(1) The editors of the literature are just as politicized and refuse to publish studies that say the earth is not warming, or that the earth is warming, but still a lot cooler than 2000 years ago. (2) You kinda missed the man's point. This article shows that the liberals/left leaning persons can be JUST as anti-science as the right leaning persons. The studies show fracking is not bad, and yet I bet I can go to facebook right now and find dozens of posts from my environmentalists or leftist friends posting the falsehoods anyway.

Basically deluded leftists acting like deluded rightists.