Slashdot Mirror


Finding Fault With Anti-Fracking Science Claims

A widely carried Associated Press article (here, as run by the Wall Street Journal) reports that some of the convincingly scientific-sounding claims of opponents of fracking don't seem to hold up to scrutiny. That's not to say that all is peaches: the article notes, for instance, that much of the naturally radioactive deep water called flowback forced up along with fracking-extracted gas "was once being discharged into municipal sewage treatment plants and then rivers in Pennsylvania," leading to concern about pollution of public water supplies. Public scrutiny and regulation mean that's no longer true. But specific claims about cancer rates, and broader ones about air pollution or other ills, are not as objective as they might appear to be, according to Duke professor Avner Vengosh and others. An excerpt: "One expert said there's an actual psychological process at work that sometimes blinds people to science, on the fracking debate and many others. 'You can literally put facts in front of people, and they will just ignore them,' said Mark Lubell, the director of the Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior at the University of California, Davis. Lubell said the situation, which happens on both sides of a debate, is called 'motivated reasoning.' Rational people insist on believing things that aren't true, in part because of feedback from other people who share their views, he said."

3 of 505 comments (clear)

  1. Happy Sunday from the Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thank you for being a friend
    Traveled down the road and back again
    Your heart is true, you're a pal and a cosmonaut.

    And if you threw a party
    Invited everyone you ever knew
    You would see the biggest gift would be from me
    And the card attached would say, thank you for being a friend.

  2. Re:Common sense by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The rational for the creation of the Department of Energy was to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign energy supplies

    No, the rational for the Department of Energy was to add to the defense budget without it looking so bad. The Dept of Energy manages the nuclear stockpile.

    The regulation of most fracking is not coming from the EPA

    No, that's not true. All gas exploration is subject to EPA regs.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. Re:Common sense by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'm sure the family's of the victims of the most recent Colarado shooting, who are currently having to solicit donations to pay for the healthcare of wounded family members are just so glad America has left it all to the private sector.

    Oh yeah - despite spending more government money per capita on healthcare then country's which do have socialized healthcare, and yet achieving worse outcomes.