Fake Password Reset E-mail Hits 7,500 Black Hat Registrants
An anonymous reader writes "7,500 Black Hat USA 2012 attendees may have been surprised to get a fake password reset e-mail sent to accounts they used to register for the conference. Black Hat has apologized and explained the lame phishing spam attempt."
...if any of them fell for it.
The only newsworthy chunk of info here is, How many of these peeps fell for it? These are the elite, what percentage fell for it?
I can tell, since it's actually the second post.
is delicious
It would be great to keep out the script kiddies. I have just the test to determine if someone is a hacker. Just ask them what they like to hack. If they answer with responses like "i like breaking into xyz systems" then deny them a ticket. If they answer with "i like to hack on xyz" and go into how they configured/wrote/learned about some system then let them in. Hacking isn't about breaking into systems or clicking on some button to attack something. It is literally the joy of learning. While breaking into a system might be hacking it's not so unless there is a learning component to it. I like to hack. I hack stuff together all the time. I throw some GNU/Linux distribution together (and having known nothing prior enjoy that). I'm a hacker. I *could* break into a system... but can't say I ever really have. Sure. I've exploited a bug or two for fun. That was a hacking as I learned something and enjoyed it. However someone clicking a button (something any computer users knows how to do) to join in on a DDoS attack on some web site is not hacking. You'd have to be the dumbest person on earth or at least over the age of 40 (loss of skills/memory/ability etc) to call that hacking.
An automatic reply should have been sent to everyone who fell for it:
Your reservation has been revoked. Please invest some time in learning basic security guidelines before applying again.
Best regards
Shit security on their end, and that posting does NOT look like an apology.
And what's this BS about expecting the most hostile network? I thought that was DEFCON...
Take off every 'sig' !!
What a laugh! I read the article, but it still makes me smile. one of their own ranks, doing this for 'fun'.
There was an unknown error in the submission.
But it was the first second post?
"A few hours later they sent me a follow-up email with a link to an explanation."
_That_ was the real attack. I bet you were curious and now you're infected.
But it was the first second post?
No, it was the second first post.
Write boring code, not shiny code!
Oh, I'm sure the link was valid. Anyone who clicked it is banned for life from all future events.
And anyone caught in cross fire can die too. Right?
"Lame phishing spam attempt" should be reworded to "sucessful phishing spam launch that took advantage of an insider security threat".
If it is in the recipient's inbox, the spam happened sucessfully. If it didn't, it was an unsucessful attempt.
A read of TFA shows no mention of the word "lame". In fact the statement does what it should do... describes what happened and what action was taken. "The email this morning was an abuse of functionality by a volunteer who has been spoken to. This feature has since been removed as a precautionary measure."
... we just get rid of the old legacy email system. What kind of black hatter still uses that spam infested crap.
now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
The 1970's called - they want to drop off the disco balls and bell bottom trousers for the rest of your nostalgia trip.
No, you'd have to be someone using the word as it's been commonly used for thirty odd years now.