Slashdot Mirror


Why You Should Be More Interested In Mars Than the Olympics

New submitter hugeinc sends this quote from an article by author Andrew Kessler: "Next week, while we're all watching NBC, a nuclear-powered, MINI-Cooper-sized super rover will land on Mars. We accurately guided this monster from 200 million miles away (that's 7.6 million marathons). It requires better accuracy than an Olympic golfer teeing off in London and hitting a hole-in-one in Auckland, New Zealand. It will use a laser to blast rocks, a chemical nose to sniff out the potential for life, and hundreds of other feats of near-magic. Will these discoveries lead us down a path to confirming life on other planets? Wouldn't that be a good story that might make people care about science?"

4 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Not exclusive... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Exactly, the Olympics is a story about people achieving, the rover landing is about humanity achieving. Both are worthy to watching. I mean the Olympics is not like the Kardashians, WWE, or any of the other mindless drivel on TV. Not only that but they are not a case of one or the other. The landing will be at 1:31 am which is 5:31 am UTC so unless they the Olympics have events at 5 am you will not have to miss anything but some sleep.
    In other words STUPID WASTE OF TIME FOR A SLASHDOT STORY. Maybe it would be better to spend time watching the Olympics and the rover landing than posting or reading junk like this.
       

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  2. Re:Also because by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Please explain the value then. People from seperate countries do things together all the time.

    What is different about the Olympics is that people do peaceful things. Unlike some of the other scenarios where people from some of these countries come together.

    The Olympics are separated from other international athletic competitions in two primary ways: 1) they're the most commercialized, corrupt, money-driven competition with the greatest focus on advertising and 2) they have a propaganda tradition mostly based on Hitler's contributions to the games. Both of those points are despicable.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  3. Re:Yea but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stopped reading at "unaltered". If you think anyone in the Olympics is "unaltered", you don't understand competitive sports. Having been a fitness professional for well over a decade, I can tell you there are at least 40 different types of performance enhancing drugs (including certain types of steroids) that can not be tested for. Being trained how to fool a lie detector test is also very easy.

    Personally, I don't get it. Olypmics doesn't actually test anything other than how obsessive someone can be about one particular thing their entire lives. They contribute nothing to society other than entertaining those with nothing else better to do than to watch others do things most of them could never do in their wildest dreams. Science contributes to our society, Olympics don't.

  4. Re:Also because by The+Slashdot+8Ball · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the World Health Organisation Oral Health Database:

    The metric used is the number of Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth in 12 Year Olds.
    England has a mean DMFT of 0.7, and
    USA has a mean DMFT of 1.19,
    that is the average American 12 Year Old has worse teeth than the average English 12 Year Old.

    Further, NHS dentistry fees:

    £17.50 ($28) for an examination
    £48 ($75) for simple procedure, such as root canal work, or removing teeth
    £209 ($329) for anything else, such as crowns or dentures

    Consider yourself shown up.