Slashdot Mirror


Google Delays Nexus Q Launch, Pre-Orders Get It Free

MBCook writes "After a mixed reaction from the press, Google will be delaying the launch of the Nexus Q. People who pre-ordered will receive the current version of the device for free. 'When we announced Nexus Q at Google I/O, we gave away devices to attendees for an early preview. The industrial design and hardware were met with great enthusiasm. We also heard initial feedback from users that they want Nexus Q to do even more than it does today. In response, we have decided to postpone the consumer launch of Nexus Q while we work on making it even better.'"

19 of 69 comments (clear)

  1. preorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is it too late to preorder?

    1. Re:preorder by ronocdh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honest question: could you really not tell that AC was joking?

  2. Between the lines by wbr1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In response, we have decided to postpone the consumer launch of Nexus Q while we work on making it even better.

    "In response to learning of possible patent litigation from Apple, et. al., we have decided to delay the launch of the Nexus Q while we cover our asses and try to remove the infringing bits."

    There, I fixed that for you.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Patent law sure promotes the Progress of Science and useful Arts, doesn't it!

    2. Re:Between the lines by Tr3vin · · Score: 2

      More than likely it is to add some GoogleTV functionality. It is pretty limited as it is. Merging the bits that it currently has into GoogleTV would make a lot of sense. It is a fully functional android device already, so this shouldn't be too difficult.

    3. Re:Between the lines by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where has Apple said anything about the Nexus Q?

      This is a smart move on Google's part. The device was very strange.

      • While the hardware was better, it was $300. An Apple TV is $100 and you can get a Roku for $50-$60.
      • It had no remote, you had to own an Android phone. The Apple TV's remote isn't very good, but at least it exists.
      • The stereo amplifier was an odd decision. Peopler either already have an amp, or they don't have speakers. What's the point of having an amp that connects to my TV to play video if I can't direct the TV's sound through the amp?
      • Google doesn't have much content right now. They can show other people's content (Hulu, Amazon, Netflix), but a Roku does that at 1/5th the price.
      • It would be possible to play games on it... but it has no remote/controller. I guess you could buy a bluetooth one.

      They could make a pretty interesting device out of it. AirPlay is a fantastic feature, I'd love to see Google come up with features like that to extend your Android device. But as announced, it seemed like final hardware designed for a vision that was still in the alpha stage, with no real software ("Let's just stick Android on it!"). I think it says a lot that since that was announced the Ouya was announced at $100, can do most everything the Q can, costs 1/3rd as much, and has had a ton of interest. Google missed the mark, and they're smart to fix it instead of launching it to die in the market.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Between the lines by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      "In response to learning of possible patent litigation from Apple, et. al., we have decided to delay the launch of the Nexus Q while we cover our asses and try to remove the infringing bits."

      Wouldn't the Q first have to be able to - oh, I don't know - actually do something USEFUL before it could infringe on anything?

      As it is, I imagine the folks at Apple, Roku, Boxee, et. al were too busy laughing after the Q's announcement to think about suing anyone.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Between the lines by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      "In response to learning of possible patent litigation from Apple, et. al., we have decided to delay the launch of the Nexus Q while we cover our asses and try to remove the infringing bits."

      Whu? Have Apple finally been granted a patent on "selling a product for 3x the cost of competing products"?

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  3. Re:Twins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, most reports are that they're scrubbing the launch because the reviews have been pretty bad.

    It only does Google content out of the Play store and YouTube videos. You have to use a second screen device as a remote. It was going to be $300.

    They botched it and they know it. I won't be surprised if they tack on some software to play other content and release it just to get them off the shelves... but they really need to be working on the next attempt.

  4. Re:Twins! by exomondo · · Score: 2

    Yeah, most reports are that they're scrubbing the launch because the reviews have been pretty bad.

    It only does Google content out of the Play store and YouTube videos. You have to use a second screen device as a remote. It was going to be $300.

    I agree, it just doesn't do enough out of the box. Though hopefully getting the current iteration into the hands of devs will yield some actual usefulness when the device does ship to consumers even if Google don't change much between now and then. Hopefully they add DLNA natively (it would nice, though highly unlikely, to have AirPlay too).

  5. Re:Just like Microsoft? by headhot · · Score: 2

    That because the don't give out release dates until the product is finished and being manufactured in mass quantities.

  6. Re:Twins! by Sark666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even with revisions I kind of want this product to fail. I recently purchased a nexus 7 which is a fantastic tablet but the earlier prototype had an sd slot and hdmi port. I suspect as others do, these features were taken out not as a cost cutting measure, but to steer you towards the Q.

    If users have a nexus 7 with hdmi out most would say good enough and be happy with that. The nexus Q has more ports for audiophiles but the vast majority will be happy simply using hdmi to the hd display and then to whatever audio system they have for that.

    And with hdmi, I could browse the web on a large screen, run games, apps etc. With this it's just stream content from your play purchases (no local content) and oh you can have a friend come over and queue (queue get it? see how smart they are?) their content that they have from the play store.

    So it's pluses are neat queuing functionality and additional audio ports

    it's cons are: no local content. can't run games, apps to your tv. and it's 300 bucks.

    Scratch that. I don't kind of want it to fail, I hope it bombs. Reason being if it's a success less and less tablets will have hdmi in the future.

    Again the nexus 7 is an amazing tablet, I just wish I had the version that wasn't downgraded for the validity of this device.

  7. Re:Wish I were a pre-orderer by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Funny

    an idiot with free hardware, apparently.

  8. Kudos to Google by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    ... for realizing the Q was a big old ball of fail.

    Seriously, what were they smoking that led them to think the $300 Q was going to receive any real-world reception other than general laughter?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. Maybe they should just call it by jforr · · Score: 4, Funny

    the Nexus Qcat?

  10. I agree by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wifi, less space than a Nomad....lame.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  11. Merge With Ouya by SinGunner · · Score: 2

    They need to buy out the people behind the Ouya system and incorporate that and make it $100. All Ouya has is money anyways. Roku is close to offering this already, now that they offer games. Google needs to control this out of the gate instead of diving in late in the game like they usually do. Android-powered, web-connected TV interface that supports gaming. KIS,S

  12. Re:Twins! by ccguy · · Score: 2

    It only does Google content out of the Play store and YouTube videos.

    And only if you are in the US. If you are somewhere else the Nexus Q android application *will not be available* to download to your android device, period. And even if you manage to download it by cheating, the youtube application won't display the icon to 'play on Q'.

    We complain about DVD and blu-ray zones all the time, but this is even worse. With a blu-ray at least if you take the player with you you can play your media everyone, but with this you are fucked. You can't use the Nexus Q *at all*, even to stream a fucking youtube video you just uploaded yourself.

  13. Re:Twins! by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google just has to let go of their fears of it being used for piracy and open the device.

    Just reading about the [lack of] capabilities of the device, it was clear what Google's concern was, and ultimately what is going to drive the company to evil. In 5 years, when we talk about what went wrong with Google so that they became the next Apple, my next paragraph is what we're going to be talking about.

    It's not piracy. It's anything that doesn't involve looking at Google ads. That's the only explanation for the otherwise-capable device's shocking crippledness. They want you to use their streaming services, but that's not anything that anyone wants. Only lock-in will get people to use that stuff, so they're trying lock-in, without even disguising it with some stupid pretense.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump