Slashdot Mirror


US Navy Admiral Questions Expensive Stealth Platforms

Trepidity writes "United States Navy Admiral and Chief of Naval Operations Jonathan Greenert stirred a controversy by questioning much of the thinking underlying current U.S. defense technology. He argues that stealth technology is unlikely to retain its usefulness much into the future, and so focus should switch towards standoff weapons. In addition, he criticizes the focus on expensive all-in-one platforms such as the F-35 fighter, arguing for a payload-centric, flexible approach he compares to trucks rather than luxury cars."

2 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. Nonsense... it is 100% effective by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/07/f-22-germans/

    "In mid-June, 150 German airmen and eight twin-engine, non-stealthy Typhoons arrived at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska for an American-led Red Flag exercise involving more than 100 aircraft from Germany, the U.S. Air Force and Army, NATO, Japan, Australia and Poland. Eight times during the two-week war game, individual German Typhoons flew against single F-22s in basic fighter maneuvers meant to simulate a close-range dogfight.

    The results were a surprise to the Germans and presumably the Americans, too. “We were evenly matched,” Maj. Marc Gruene told Combat Aircraft’s Jamie Hunter. The key, Gruene said, is to get as close as possible to the F-22 and stay there. “They didn’t expect us to turn so aggressively.”"

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  2. Re:Diplomacy does not always work by risom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And yes, trickle down did work until we regulated industry out of the US and people had to choose asking if you want fries with that as a career path.

    Nope, trickle down never actually worked. Have a look at the real wage development visualized in the diagram in the criticsm section of the wikipedia article.