Slashdot Mirror
Samsung Admonished For Releasing Rejected Evidence
New submitter zaphod777 writes with an update on Samsung's release of info on pre-iPhone designs. It seems the additional information released relating to the F700 was actually rejected from the trial, and the judge isn't too happy: "Samsung has already appealed the rulings denying the evidence, but that didn't stop the company's lawyers from trying again today after Apple briefly showed the F700 on a slide during its opening statements. Claiming that Apple had 'opened the door' to discussion of the F700, Samsung asked the court to reconsider. That didn't go so well with Judge Koh, who noted that 'Samsung has filed like 10 motions for reconsideration,' and asked Samsung lead attorney John Quinn to sit back down. At one point in the exchange Quinn told Koh that he was 'begging the court,' and desperately asked 'what's the point in having a trial?' — but Koh simply wasn't buying it. 'Don't make me sanction you,' she said. 'Please.'"
And before you anal-retentive grammar Nazi's pile on, yes I know the difference between its and it's.
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
...when the judge was on the bench playing around on her iPhone. And had been spotted saving a spot waiting for the iPhone 5.
And before you anal-retentive grammar Nazi's pile on, yes I know the difference between its and it's.
Of course. The difference is the apo'strophe.
That'd be "Nazis" - no apostrophe for the plural form.
Sorry, but you were basically asking for it.