Wikipedia-Sponsored Pilot Study Lauds Wikipedia Accuracy

Posted by samzenpus on Thursday August 2, 2012 @06:46AM from the accuracy-and-truthiness dept.

netbuzz writes "The Wikimedia Foundation today is releasing the results of a 'pilot study' it commissioned last year to assess the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia in such a way that it would provide a methodology blueprint for others do more thorough reviews of online encyclopedias. The results are in, and despite ready acknowledgment of the small sample size and paragraphs worth of other caveats, the parents of Wikipedia can't help but note that its baby was judged to have outperformed other online encyclopedias, including Encyclopedia Britannica, in three different languages. Britannica, which disputed the Wikipedia-friendly results of a much-cited Fortune comparison report back in 2005, has yet to offer a reply to this one."

4 of 125 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

In before... by pinkj · 2012-08-02 06:49 · Score: 4, Funny

In before 'citation needed'!
Oil industry report says oil industry great by crazyjj · 2012-08-02 06:49 · Score: 5, Funny

And water wet.

--
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
Not Noteworthy by ohnocitizen · 2012-08-02 06:59 · Score: 4, Funny

Unfortunately the study has been deemed Not Noteworthy by one of Wikipedia's editors and been removed.
Re:Smoking is good for your health* by crazyjj · 2012-08-02 07:10 · Score: 3, Funny

Well, duh, of course they're going to make cigarettes safe. Think about it. Why would they want their best customers dying off?

--
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?