400,000 American Homes Have Dumped Pay TV This Year
redkemper writes "More than 400,000 American homes have cut the cord and ditched their cable and satellite pay-TV services since the start of 2012. The figure includes 169,000 subscribers shed by Time Warner Cable last quarter, marking the service provider's tenth consecutive quarter of customer losses. It also includes the 52,000 net subscribers DirecTV lost this past quarter, and 176,000 customers who left Comcast."
...and I haven't regretted 1 minute of it.
Usenet + SAB + Sickbeard = I'm satisfied
No, they'll see it as a reason to lobby the government to prop up their failing business model, just like every other business model disrupted by the Internet.
I've found that I'm much happier, more productive, and better entertained when the option of idly watching whatever is on the air is removed. Even though it's something for nothing, watching it wastes time that would have been put to better use watching shows I'm actually interested in or engaging in some other form of entertainment that I enjoy more (e.g. plowing through my backlog of games, reading a nice novel, finding a friend who I haven't seen in awhile to grab an impromptu dinner with). That's why I unplugged it: to enjoy things I like better more often.
And nothing of value was lost.
That particular form of entertainment did not last much beyond the year Two Thousand Forty.
Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once
Well many cable TV providers are fighting this trend by offering free service to people who want to leave. Why would they do this?
Well, I can answer that by describing the reason why I get free bicycle magazines. I bought a bicycle a couple of years ago...a really nice one. With it, I was given a trial subscription to a cycling magazine. Nice, but not worth paying for... I would look at it if I had it, but wouldn't buy it. But that's why I got it for free. Initially, I started getting "your subscriiption is going to expire!" notices. Then I got "last issue!" notices. Then I got more magazines after that. But why? Well, the magazines are full of ads. And those ads are worthless if they can't show the advertisers they have subscribers.
Now, let's look at cable TV... lots of ads... ads which are worthless if they don't have subscribers.
At-least watch Olympics
Why do I need to watch a corporate orgy of sponsorship and advertising where the public foots the bill and they take profit?
So I can see which individual blessed with the right genes and the most funding can run faster or jump higher?
I'd rather watch a Coke commercial. At least its not pretending to be something its not, and it usually has good production values.
For those who found the above too long/hard to read, you can watch it here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5Gf0VKXk5Q&feature=related
I'll just be over here soaking up the irony.
I thought the Olympics WERE a Coke commercial.
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
I dropped Cable over the AMC fight and haven't looked back. Frustrated that I'll have to wait to see Game of Thrones and Walking Dead but maybe this latest debacle will force the content providers to sell streaming services like HBO Go. The joke is Netflix streaming doesn't carry much current content but they have a ton of older stuff and they are adding faster than I can consume so at this rate I'll never run out. I mostly let it run while I work for white noise anyway. It's got the added benefit of no annoying commercials. It's why I stopped watching CNN, their ratio of news to commercials is 50/50. Completely obscene.
Shut up. I'm old. I like to tell stories to make me think my life is meaningful.