Slashdot Mirror
Shadowrun Comes To Linux, MMO Planned
New submitter junkrig writes "After a highly successful Kickstarter campaign, Jordan Weisman, creator of Shadowrun, has returned to bring the series back to the screen as Shadowrun Returns; an old-school, turn-based tactical RPG. Their successful initial fundraising (over $1.8 million) allowed them to commit to developing a native Linux version of the game. A second team, working closely with Weisman, now hopes to bring a similar, turn-based Shadowrun game to life: Shadowrun Online. To be built with the Unity 4 engine, Shadowrun Online will be massively multiplayer and have native Linux support from the start — assuming, of course, they manage to fund their project. Both games are expected for release in 2013."
Then make it 20 D6 dice without 2's 3's or 4's printed on them. Those useless numbers dont need to be on there.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
It looks like the combat part of Shadowrun Online will be tactical turn based co-op team multiplayer, though you can play as a single player by hiring NPC's for missions and control them yourself.
There will be social hubs in various cities that will be MMO-like, where you move around in realtime to socialize (or not), do legwork (research/detective work to get intel on future missions), buy stuff for your characters with in-game money only on the Campaign servers or real money microtransactions on the F2P servers. Yes, they have both. You can "buy" the full core game and play on the Campaign servers, or just join the F2P servers and only pay for what interests you. The developer has stated firmly the game will not be pay-to-win, and they'll have mechanics in place to prevent pay-to-win.
People complained having two different economic models and two different servers might split the community, but the Campaign servers were added because there was already an entirely separate community that refused to play F2P games. So now both communities are served. If you have any interest in this, read more about it in the updates tab on their Kickstarter page.
linux is selling out faster than you can say "we wish we were apple!"
Linux is not your SeKrIt KLuB.
Also, you must be one of those people that stops liking a band that becomes popular.
Hipster.
--
BMO
I thought I'd never actually use that word here, but there it is, Linux hipsterism.
Actually, I have never understood people who can't control their laughter that bit so that they don't burst juices of their mouth or nose.
You can never have enough d6s. :p
I always take about 100 to our Shadowrun gamedays, and it never seems to be enough for my friends.
"baited breath" - phooye... You must be a Linux penguin. Normal people do not eat achovies or other kinds of fish bait.
Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
Cookie cutter just because it's made with Unity? That's like saying Unreal engine games are cookie cutter. Or any game made with any full featured third party engine is cookie cutter.
I remember an age just before hardware accelerated graphics -- Those game devs who wrote their own (3D) engine had games that looked very different than the others who licensed the Wolf3D, Doom or Quake engine. After hardware accelerated graphics everything sort of looked the same for a while until GPUs had more features to select from -- The fixed function pipeline "look" is easily recognisable. Vertex & pixel shaders have given us back almost all of the flexibility and diversity that software rasterizers have, enabling Homogeneous computing could get us the rest of the way...
Unfortunately, the diversity gained in modern GPUs has been diminished a great deal by the prolific use of just a few 3D engines. Even when the game tries to be visually different I can usually tell at a glance what engine the game's using: It's a running joke among my friends & colleagues, we show a vid and guess the engine. Most games are all too easy. Very few have us scratching our heads, and of those even fewer used a dominant engine like Unity, Unreal, etc. Eg: I can look at a game like Borderlands and say, Ah yep, it's the same engine as Gears. The slow texture streaming on level load is a dead give-away, but there are many other similarities too... It's sameness that otherwise wouldn't exist if not for the re-use of an engine.
Prolific use of only a few physics engines, like Havok, also reduce variety in gameplay a great deal.
I'm not saying reusing software is bad, writing engines is hard work, but it's really not THAT hard (far easier than writing software rasterizers)... I think we need A LOT more engines out there to stave off the sameness we currently have.
I know this is Slashdot, but one thing I've learned is to have an open mind and consider the other side of an argument: Why does someone feel this way? Is there merit to their point of view? Argument is worth less than discussion, IMO.
You've taken the GP's comment to an extreme -- Every game that uses the same engine is not cookie-cutter just because they use the same engines, but the complaint is valid. There is a certain samey look to the Unity, IDTech, Unreal engine, etc. engines, and it takes a fair amount of effort to actually make a game look different while using these engines -- Many gamedevs don't make the effort.
Publishers don't want to hear, "We're making our own engine" -- That's risky, they'd rather you license a popular engine -- Until the indie game resurgence it was very difficult to get into the game industry if you wrote your own engine -- This is why there is so much graphics sameness among AAA titles, IMO. Differentiation comes at a price, and publishers don't want to take the risk.
There would be much more diversity if we used a more diverse selection of game engines. This is why I support the idea of writing a new engine. Even if you don't personally recognize the similarities, can you not believe that some do? I put it to you that more engine diversity naturally begets more diverse games.
It wouldn't be terribly difficult to meet half way. Roll 2d10 (or 3d6, or something) + skill level, and then create a Unisystem style success table (e.g. up to 12 is +0, 13-15 is +1, 16-18 is +2 etc. -- that gives you the same mean number of hits for a given skill level).
You'll get a bit more variance (compared to the original system) in number of hits for low skill scores, and less for high skill scores, but it would be a pretty good approximation.
The title says it all.
Even if you can only offer $5 or $10, that will help. Shadowrun is a great setting for a long term game. The world is rich with lore and the potential for deep stories is definitely there. This project has so much potential, but it is dangerously short of missing the funding goal.
They are set to make a big impact in the mobile market and the way that games are developed. It won't matter what brand of hardware you and your friends have. Everyone can play together.
For all of you Euro readers, the game is being developed in the EU. If you do not support it based on its merits as A. An already good looking game with great long term potential and B. A good game that can be played on Linux, then support it because C. It is NOT made in America. ;)
I'll take my cyberpunk without the magic, please. Really, Shadowrun is little more than D&D with guns.
"He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
Even so, isn't the content of the game, the gameplay, how the missions work, what they're like, how you get an resolve them, much more important than the graphics engine?
Of course it should also have the distinctive visual style of Shadowrun, but I think that's more a matter of art design than the engine they use.
I've been hating bands when they become popular since before it became popular.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon