Slashdot Mirror


Curiosity Lands On Mars

The Mars Science Laboratory, a.k.a. Curiosity, is now less than an hour from touchdown on Mars. It's scheduled to land at 1:31 AM EDT (0531 UTC). The landing will be monitored by the Odyssey orbiter, which will be the data relay between Curiosity and Earth. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will be listening to Curiosity as well (yes — two of our probes orbiting another world will be watching a third). While Odyssey will be giving us close to real-time updates (as close as possible, given the 14-minute time delay), MRO's data will take a bit longer to be processed and evaluated. NASA is broadcasting from the JPL mission room right now. If you'd like to watch a pretty awesome graphical visualization of the mission, check out eyes.nasa.gov. If you'd like to play around with a Java app showing Mars-local times and seasons, check out Mars24. If you'd like to watch unofficial coverage, Bad Astronomer Phil Plait and a bunch of other astronomers are hosting a public Google Hangout. If you'd like to read a detailed explanation of the landing, checkout NASA's press kit (PDF), and there's also a post about what to expect when the rover starts sending pictures back to Earth, which will be about two hours after the rover lands. Good luck to everyone involved! We'll update this post when we get word on the landing.
Update: 08/06 05:33 GMT by S : Curiosity is on the ground! Everything looks nominal, and everybody at JPL is cheering. Congratulations, folks. They're continuing to receive telemetry from Odyssey, and the connection is strong. They've now received the first images back from Mars of Curiosity on the ground. A press briefing is scheduled in a little bit (2:15AM EDT, 0615 UTC), and several more throughout the day as more data comes back.

6 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: -1, Troll

    Seriously, how many "Curiosity is About To Land" articles do we need today?

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  2. Landing will never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Sorry, but the way this thing lands is way too complicated to ever work.

  3. Fails Compared to the Moon Landing by tmosley · · Score: -1, Troll

    As I recall, images of the lunar lander were transmitted live as the landing happened, and were relayed to TVs around the US/world. Yet here, there is apparently no such footage. So far, just a thumbnail of the tire. How many decades have passed since Apollo? Do we really need to tell these idiots that they are a public relations firm in addition to a scientific organization, and that for them to continue to receive cash money, they need to inspire people with their work? Watching a bunch of engineers high-five each other is not what I stayed up half the night for. I wanted to see footage of the lander as it performed it's crazy descent. But that is too much for NASA to handle, I guess.

    1. Re:Fails Compared to the Moon Landing by tmosley · · Score: -1, Troll

      Perhaps we should call up the 1970's and ask them how THEY did it?

      Bunch of defensive morons in here. No-one has explained to me why live picture was possible in the stone age on the moon, but is impossible today, and apparently I am an asshole for asking, and should just shut up and dance around at images of high-fiving engineers like "everyone" else. You know, despite the fact that interest in space has declined to the point that the space program is in serious danger of being cut back to almost nothing, having already been cut to nearly nothing.

  4. Re:Everyone seems to be using Apple.. by WindBourne · · Score: -1, Troll
    Real geeks know how to make things stay up. Sadly, non-geeks will use an OS that lets you down all the time. And loaded with disease.

    No doubt, that post will lead to many with horns screaming tomorrow

    You do not know what you are talking about. Windows is the bes888798se98wer9w8erwerwer....

    Then from another system, they will say that as soon as they get rid of the virus on that windows, they will create a new chant to bring the true dark one over to my house to install Windows on it. Like I am really going to invite in Bill Gates into my house. Then I will have NO power against him.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  5. Re:MOAR Mars Rovers FTW!!1 by Pausanias · · Score: 0, Troll

    Given a finite pot of money (say $2.5B), we could have done truly new things.

    Why did have to go back to Mars for the nth time with yet another rover when we could visit Europa instead which is COVERED IN WATER and probably liquid beneath.

    The reason we didn't was (1) a bunch of vested interests and (2) fear that it would have been a harder sell to congress. This is the source of our stagnation.