Slashdot Mirror


Curiosity Lands On Mars

The Mars Science Laboratory, a.k.a. Curiosity, is now less than an hour from touchdown on Mars. It's scheduled to land at 1:31 AM EDT (0531 UTC). The landing will be monitored by the Odyssey orbiter, which will be the data relay between Curiosity and Earth. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will be listening to Curiosity as well (yes — two of our probes orbiting another world will be watching a third). While Odyssey will be giving us close to real-time updates (as close as possible, given the 14-minute time delay), MRO's data will take a bit longer to be processed and evaluated. NASA is broadcasting from the JPL mission room right now. If you'd like to watch a pretty awesome graphical visualization of the mission, check out eyes.nasa.gov. If you'd like to play around with a Java app showing Mars-local times and seasons, check out Mars24. If you'd like to watch unofficial coverage, Bad Astronomer Phil Plait and a bunch of other astronomers are hosting a public Google Hangout. If you'd like to read a detailed explanation of the landing, checkout NASA's press kit (PDF), and there's also a post about what to expect when the rover starts sending pictures back to Earth, which will be about two hours after the rover lands. Good luck to everyone involved! We'll update this post when we get word on the landing.
Update: 08/06 05:33 GMT by S : Curiosity is on the ground! Everything looks nominal, and everybody at JPL is cheering. Congratulations, folks. They're continuing to receive telemetry from Odyssey, and the connection is strong. They've now received the first images back from Mars of Curiosity on the ground. A press briefing is scheduled in a little bit (2:15AM EDT, 0615 UTC), and several more throughout the day as more data comes back.

46 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Richard C. Hoagland will be on describing the Martian civilization that NASA is hiding from us.

    1. Re:Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Funny

      ARNOLD: Get your ass to Maars!

      CURIOSITY: Okay Done.

    2. Re:Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We just landed a giant robot the size of a car in a manner that we'd expect from a james bond movie. The type of computers nasa uses shouldn't even register on the scale of how fuggin awesome this mission is.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    3. Re:Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Watching the NASA feed I was so glad to get a virtual boner from the fact there wasnt a single toy system in the room. I was so glad to see Sun, MACs and Linux systems fully represented.

      Boy, I miss the old /., where you'd already have had a couple big-iron snobs with 3- or 4-digit IDs explaining that those are toy computers.

    4. Re:Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I were a civilized Martian, I'd be hiding from us.

    5. Re:Tune in to Coast to Coast AM by Nethead · · Score: 5, Funny

      NASA saves the big iron for the important job: Payroll.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  2. Streaming video by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    The best-quality streaming video of the event from JPL that I've found is over at Ustream.

    FYI, FWIW, HTH.

    1. Re:Streaming video by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking of commentators, is anyone else annoyed at the NASA commentator?

      They were giving the location of the landing and she cut in blabbing about something in the middle of them saying how far off their initial expected landing point was. I think they were saying it was just a couple meters which is outstanding considering the distance involved and the ability or chances to stray slightly in the process.

      I mean I'm watching the NASA feed in order to hear all the details. If I cared about someone's comments, I would wait until some news agency did a write up on it. They should have shut the hell up while they were reading the results of the different stages off.

    2. Re:Streaming video by Microlith · · Score: 5, Informative

      They did. This stream was pure comms and nothing else. I kept the annoying PR stream open in another tab but muted.

    3. Re:Streaming video by mbone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I also heard that, and it did sound like they were talking about a few meters offset but, note

      - the landing was out of sight of Earth, so there was no direct Earth tracking of the landing.
      - Mars Odyssey orbiter has at best a very bad Doppler tracking system, which I don't think they were even using, and
      - the internal inertial guidance system is not going to be good at the meter level.

      So, I would really doubt that they currently know the landing accuracy to anything like the meter level. It will take a few days to really determine where the rover is, and thus the true error. (The last I heard, they do not plan ANY range / doppler tracking from Earth, which I regard as a mistake, but it's best not to get me started on that.)

    4. Re:Streaming video by icebike · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read your own link, you will see that nobody but the Russians even tried to land, and one of
      their landers (Mars 3, 1971) lasted 20 seconds after touch down (or was it a crash, nobody is quite sure).
      Mars 6 transmitted data on descent, but was never heard from again.

      Russian Venus missions landed and transmitted imagess.

      So, no, the US is not the only country to put a lander on another planet.

      However the US is the only country to put a lander on Mars that survived more than a few seconds.

      And the only country with operational experience on another planet beyond simply receiving a few hurried photos prior to
      vehicle failure. It should be pointed out that Germany, France, Russia, and a couple others collaborated on the Curiosity lander.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  3. Best place to catch up on the arrival by bkk_diesel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out http://eyes.nasa.gov/

    From the page:
    ""Eyes on the Solar System" is a 3-D environment full of real NASA mission data. Explore the cosmos from your computer. Hop on an asteroid. Fly with NASA's Voyager spacecraft. See the entire solar system moving in real time. It's up to you. You control space and time."

    and

    "Eyes on the Solar System lets you ride with Curiosity all the way to the surface of Gale crater. Preview the events of Entry Descent and Landing, or watch live!"

    1. Re:Best place to catch up on the arrival by FrankDrebin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That simulation is very cool. Would be even better if it actually showed units the JPL folks are using instead of miles.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    2. Re:Best place to catch up on the arrival by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

      When they first put together the Mars mission in 2004, the Library of Congress was smaller than it is today.
      So instead of confusing people with 2004 LoCs vs 2012 LoCs, they just went with miles.
      It's what helped them land the Curiosity rover only a few meters from the original target.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  4. Re:Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by txoof · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As many as it takes until we know what happens to this awesome nuclear powered rover with frikin lasers on another frikin planet!

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  5. FFS... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's scheduled to land at 1:31 AM EST

    EDT!

  6. Late-Breaking News from the Council: VICTORY! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > It is - the question remains whether intact or not. We're just waiting for the radio signals to arrive.

    "Relative to whose frame of reference, blueworlder?"

    The Council of Elders has confirmed the interception and destruction of the latest mechanized terror from the blue world.

    K'Breel, Speaker for the Council of Elders, addressed the planet thus:

    Citizens, it is with great joy that I announce to you the destruction of the invader from the blue world!

    The blueworlders' latest robotic instrument of terror was powered by a Pew-238 nucleowarming device which was equipped with a point defense mechanism consisting of a light source so powerful that it could blast away the very red soil upon which we thrive.

    Yet at the last moment, when all seemed lost, our forces fired upon the thin umbilical cord connecting the flying invader with its power source and associated optical weapons system. Its connection to its power source severed, the invading vessel flew off in a dizzying spiral and crashed spectacularly into a nearby hillside.

    Rejoice, podmates! Our red world is once again safe!

    When a junior combat reporter pointed out that the link between the carrier vessel and the mechanized invader may have been designed to be broken at the moment of landing, that the actual threat was the so-called "power source" and not the flying invader, and suggested that if the Martian Defense Force had just waited just a few seconds longer, the squibs holding the skyhook to the skycrane might have failed, resulting in the carrier vessel crashing down upon the invader, thereby destroying both, K'Breel had the combat reporter's gelsacs placed directly in front of the dormant invader's photonic weapons.

    "If the blue-shirted denizens of the blue world seek evidence of organic matter so strongly," mused K'Breel, "then let them have their fill of it!"

    (Because the Council must to draft at least two of these press releases with every new phase of the battle, the Speaker would like to thank the infiltrators at the Martian Cyberdefense Detachment (unit 216.34.181.48) for remaining as glued to the screen over the past fifteen units of time as everybeing on the Council was.)

  7. TOUCHDOWN by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Curiosity is ON THE SURFACE.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Re:Landing will never work by txoof · · Score: 5, Informative

    AFRAID NOT! Touchdown Confirmed!!

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  9. Re:Landing will never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suck it, jackass.

  10. Gold Medal by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the gold medal for the all-species 350M KM space landing goes to NASA, who scored a perfect 10 for landing on the surface of Mars!

    Congratulations to NASA and the JPL. Dare Mighty Things indeed.

  11. Re:Landing will never work by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surprise, surprise, actual scientists and engineers are better than you at this stuff.

  12. Re:Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    inorite? Because we land car-sized nuclear-powered portable science laboratories on other planets all the fucking time, right dude?

    "News for Nerds, stuff that matters" - This qualifies as both. And we'll probably have a nonstop stream of Curiosity FPs over the next few days. Suck it up or find another site, because as much as I hate to sound exclusionary, it sounds like you jus' don't belong here.

  13. Wow. by adolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Huge thanks to NASA/JPL for pulling this thing off, and letting everyone be a part of it.

    I was watching a live simulation of the thing full-screen on one monitor (eyes.nasa.gov), and watching/hearing commentary on Nasa TV on another. It was very thrilling.

    As a geek, foremost I find myself going WOW> HOLY !!! WE JUST LANDED A WINNEBEGO [ok, it's a bit smaller than the average Winny] ON MARS!!!

    But I also find myself impressed that the Ustream link I posted (above) had something like 230k viewers at peak, and despite the load it never missed a beat for me. The simulation appeared to be happening in with very low-latency, and provided spectacular imagery.

    Politically, if these methods of passive involvement were more widely publicized, funding the space program would be a no-brainer for any American -- just for the excitement involved, if nothing else, of accomplishing such a difficult task.

    Wish I could link to the first photos (there seem to be two of them), but they don't seem to be officially posted just yet....

    1. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not true.

      In fact NASA was amazed just how much continued interest there was in the Spirit and Opportunity rovers over the years.
      The hits on the web site show a huge spike every time one of these
      rovers bump into an interesting rock, even if the mainstream media can't be bothered to mention it.

      Nobody expects constant 24 7 news coverage of the slow journey of a rover across a barren plane. Nor do we watch
      sports super stars driving to the stadium.

      This idea that there has to be 24/7 engagement of drop-jawed rapture to indicate
      a high level of public interest seems to be trotted out ONLY for Space explorations.

      Virtually no other endeavor on earth is judged by this standard.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  14. Re:Fails Compared to the Moon Landing by Megane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't know if trolling or just doesn't understand the kind of bandwidth you don't get during a complicated high-speed descent that ends on the far side of another planet. Why don't you just call up AT&T and get them to install DSL on the rover? Or maybe you can crank your wifi router up to get a better signal.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Mars species by ikarys · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first encounter with alien life has not gone well. A catlike alien has been squashed and killed by Curiosity.

  16. Woot by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sky crane for the win. I had images in my head of hovering Eagles from Space 1999. :-)

  17. Same feeling by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was just thinking how awesome it was watching NASA TV compared to NBC Olympic footage, and then she goes and pulls a Costas, pulling away just as they were reading out some cool technical details.

    REALLY annoying. If I'm watching NASA TV let me in on all the technical details possible please!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, how many "Curiosity is About To Land" articles do we need today?

    You might want to turn in your nerd badge and remove slashdot from your bookmarks. Try www.disney.com instead.

    --
    No sig today...
  19. We are not alone by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 4, Funny
  20. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kudos to the folks at NASA and JPL for a job well done. Hopefully we'll get some great science out of it.

    All of this just shows what a huge mistake was made in cutting the budget for planetary science and future Mars missions. Tonight, NASA did everything that they are supposed to do. They pushed us further out into the solar system, giving us the most detailed view yet of another world. They pushed scientific boundaries, sending an entire laboratory to another planet to look for extraterrestrial life. They pushed the limits of engineering. And they showed the world what we look like at our best- an America that is innovative, pioneering, and willing to take risks.

    Times are tough, but of all the things to cut from the budget, why cut planetary missions? The cuts mean that we don't have anything in the works; we've got Curiosity but we have no plans to follow up. I find myself deeply disappointed that the White House would do something so short-sighted. The thing is, what happened tonight was genuinely inspiring. I felt truly proud of what my country had done. And I tried to remember the last time I had felt like that, and then it hit me. It was when Obama was elected.

    There's more than a little irony to that.

  21. Re:Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by iplayfast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, I think we need more. This is great news. Much better then bloodshed etc. Isn't it nice to get some good news for a change?

  22. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since I'm from Europe I'd like to add: Kudos to the people of the US for funding it!

  23. Primary directive by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Message from Curiosity: Landed safely. Initiating primary directive - kill cats.

  24. Carl Sagan would be proud! by slacka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    “We tend to hear much more about the splendors returned than the ships that brought them or the shipwrights. It has always been that way. Even those history books enamored of the voyages of Christopher Columbus do not tell much about the builders of the Nina the Pinta and the Santa Maria or about the principle of the caravel. These spacecraft their designers builders navigators and controllers are examples of what science and engineering set free for well-defined peaceful purposes can accomplish. Those scientists and engineers should be role models for an America seeking excellence and international competitiveness. They should be on our stamps.”
      Carl Sagan,

    Congratulations NASA and JPL! I hope you continue to inspire us all to dare mighty things!

  25. Re:Landing will never work by arkane1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's obvious that god put it on Mars, then.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  26. Re:Slashdot - Multi-Posted Articles for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, yeah. That's what unix nerds tend to use for their mobile devices. Apple laptops are easily the most popular laptops I've ever seen among us engineering types at Sun and Oracle in the last decade.

  27. Re:MOAR Mars Rovers FTW!!1 by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, because we're still busy spending seven trillion dollars to bailout financial institutions while simultaneously pissing ourselves over the "massive" NASA budget for trivial shit like furthering the reach of all fucking human-kind.

  28. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by Krishnoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kudos to the people of the US for funding it!

    While we're exchanging acknowledgements, my heartfelt gratitude goes to the EU for their efforts in compelling the world to standardize on micro-USB for cell phone power and data.

    Offtopic, I know, but very much appreciated :-)

  29. Re:MOAR Mars Rovers FTW!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think Obama said we were supposed to be working towards putting people on Mars. I get confused... I think Bush v2 said the moon.

    But give it 5 years, the plan will change. We spend so much time dicking around with the $33 per person, per year, we spend on NASA... it seems crazy. I mean, we each spend thousands of dollars per year on our military. Like, work for a month or so only to donate it all to the DoD. And they spend it on a handful of multi-billion-dollar models of planes that still don't work, while sending kids out to get blown up with no armor, short-changing veterans on medical services and such... always complaining about budget constraints while nobody important ever seems to question how they spent their money. By comparison, NASA is a fantastic bargain.

  30. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kudos to the people of US who have founded it one way or another. And certainly kudos to NASA folk who took that money and made it work.

    Overall picture is not so nice, however. Here are some costs for comparison:

    MSL Project (which yielded Curiosity): $2.5 billion
    London Olympics 2012: $14.5 billion (public expenses for venues, security etc only, doesn't include the cost of the events themselves - that's paid by private sponsors)
    A single month of war in Afghanistan (as of 2011): $6.7 billion
    Total cost of the war to date: $470 billion !!!

    Yup, the US alone could land two rovers per month if it stopped chasing mujis and camels in Afghanistan! But, hey, at least they land something? EU is, on the paper at least, a bigger economy. Think about what US and EU could accomplish together if they stopped squandering money on stupid things.

  31. Re:MOAR Mars Rovers FTW!!1 by ivano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For Europa we need to drill through 20 km of ice. We can do 4km in 10 years (like Lake Vostok). But 20 km autonomously. Not in the near future. And where do we drill. We learnt from Viking not to be too ambitious. And I think your fantasy is getting mixed up with your reality. Also we go to Mars because it's the best chance to find life. They are only rocks to you because you never bothered to actually *look* at what is there.

  32. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's the reasoning for that: From the point of view of the people controlling their budget, NASA's raison-d'etre is public relations for the United States. That science stuff is just a concession to all those eggheads who want to actually learn about stuff.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  33. Re:Curiosity is on Mars! by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hope so too. But still, there is nothing more nauseating than American Nationalism oozing out of every statement on the mission success. It's worse than the Chinese - and that takes some doing.

    Listen, America has done plenty of things that we should be ashamed of. When you're blindly supporting the country through things like unjust wars and human rights abuses, that's nationalism. But sometimes the country does something genuinely right, something true to the values of the nation. Like the guys at NASA did tonight. I think we've earned the right to take a brief break from worrying about how screwed up things are with the country economically, politically, and militarily, and feel a little pride about doing something something that's genuinely amazing. So please f*** off.

  34. Re:Any recommendation for Chinese audiences? by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the translation is of the same quality Google Translate usually produces, your girlfriend is wondering why the US is invading the Red Sea with an autonomous sorcery platform.