Slashdot Mirror


Google Unveils New Search Features, Including iOS Voice Search

First time accepted submitter sohmc writes "Some time ago, Google admitted that the biggest threat was not other search engines but services like Siri. However, Google just bridged that gap with Google Voice Search, already available in Jelly Bean, but also available via downloadable app. Google also submitted this app to the iOS App Store and is currently waiting approval. However, Slashdotters are no doubt recalling to mind the 'Google Voice' fiasco, in which Apple refused to allow it to appear, saying that it replaces a native function. It wasn't until Apple was brought before Congress to answer questions on how it approves or rejects apps that Google Voice was brought in."

4 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Re:gay by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Informative

    Coincidentally (perhaps), "Siri" was the name of a gay starship captain in "The forever War".

  2. Re:not equivalent by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not true. It's done much more than simple text entry for a long time, and it got a major upgrade in Jelly Bean. Reviews are now generally calling it superior to Siri.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  3. Re:Not a monopoly... by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You don't have to be a monopoly to be prosecuted. Microsoft certainly wasn't a monopoly on the desktop when it was prosecuted. Or Standard Oil when it was prosecuted. You only have to have a large enough share of a certain market that your presence is "anti-competitive" and blocks other companies from succeeding. Apple certainly fits that description in the cellphone & tablet markets.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  4. Re:Not a monopoly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The monopoly "requirement" only applies to Section 2 violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    Section 1 "anti-competitive" violations have no such requirement.