Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best On-Site Backup Plan?

An anonymous reader writes "I know most people use backup services in the cloud now, off-site, but does anyone have good ideas on how to best protect data without it leaving the site? I'm a photographer and, I shoot 32GB to 64GB in a couple of hours. I've accumulated about 8TB of images over the past decade and just can't imagine paying to host them somewhere off-site. I don't make enough money as it is. Currently I just redundantly back them up to hard drives in different rooms of my house, but that's a total crapshoot — if there's a fire, I'd be out of luck. Does anyone keep a hard disk or NAS inside a fireproof safe? In a bunker in the cellar? In the detached garage? It's so much data that even doing routine backups bogs the system down for days. I'd love suggestions, especially from gamers or videographers who have TBs of data they need to back up, on what options there are with a limited budget to maximize protection."

60 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Offsite != cloud by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are offsite options besides the cloud. I shuffle hard drives between work and home. If you work from home, you could do the same at a friend's house or something.

    1. Re:Offsite != cloud by Fwipp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if you don't have any friends, keep one in a bank's safe deposit box. They're usually not that pricey.

    2. Re:Offsite != cloud by networkBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do this.
      Whenever I finish a project I make two copies onto notebook sata drives. One in my media vault (a mechanics tool chest with drawers that happen to be the right size) for reference, and the other to the bank deposit box. A deposit box that holds ~30 2.5" sata drives is $25/year.

      If there is even an event that takes both the bank and my house out at the same time, then I have vastly bigger problems.

      For active work I do snapshots onto a drive and my working set is on a mirrored volume.
      -nb

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Offsite != cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And if you don't have any friends, keep one in a bank's safe deposit box. They're usually not that pricey.

      Be careful with that, I store my expensive 200+ pound pull strength rare earth magnets in mine :)

    4. Re:Offsite != cloud by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm looking to make a freeNAS setup at home, with multiple drives.

      Once that is working...I'm looking to maybe set up a second mirrored one at my parent's house, in another state...and just keep them sync'ed. Back their stuff up to the one up there, it sync's with mine...my stuff backup to mine and sync's with the backup up there.

      If not with family, why not make a deal with friends to do the offsite backup with each other...just encrypted the partitions and all to keep things private...but that should help, eh?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Offsite != cloud by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which underscores the other necessity of backups, you must regularly test your media to make sure you actually have a backup. That's something I learned the hard way (and it didn't take any big-ass magnets sitting next to the archive tapes).

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Offsite != cloud by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, it seems like every other day some poor photographer has his photos rifled through by the local bank.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Offsite != cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Came here to say this. You can usually work a deal with a credit union for like $50/year. Granted, they won't guarantee your data won't be lost should they have a fire Speaking of fires,,,, don't waste your money on a fire safe.
      UNless you're prepared to pay through the nose for a data certified safe, it's not worth it....
      disk platters lose their magnetism very easily in a fire, even if the safe doesn't get hot enough to burn paper, you're very likely lose your data

      You should also consider finding a friend in the business who might want to do harddrive exchanges... you keep one of his and he keeps one of yours, and you swap them out for another one every month or whathave you.

      And finally, as difficult as it would be to do this, you need to take a long hard look at your portfolio, and consider deleting some of them ( sacrilege I know )
      or compress them to some other advanced lossless format ( 7zip LZMA maybe? )

    8. Re:Offsite != cloud by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      And if you don't have any friends, keep one in a bank's safe deposit box.

      Don't forget to poke holes in the safe deposit box so he can breathe.

    9. Re:Offsite != cloud by Mr_Whoopass · · Score: 2

      Does not compute. How can I keep a friend in a safety deposit box if I don't have any?

    10. Re:Offsite != cloud by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 2

      Here's what I do (with about 3TB data now):

      I've got a dedicated backup server at home that backs up all machines there automatically and rsync's the backup to another machine offsite overnight.

      I've got an uncapped but relatively slow connection, uplink speed in practice about 2MB/s, but that's enough: it rarely takes more than three hours to do the rsync. Occasionally (like after returning from a two-week trip to Kenya) I've got so much new data (photos) that it takes more than 24 hours, but that's rare (and causes no problems per se, other than increased window of vulnerability, but one day is acceptable for me). Also, both machines have hotswap disk slots, so I could do the sync at home and carry the disks over should I one day get so much new data that rsyncing it over the network would take too long.

      This works very well for me. It does require a reasonable network connection and a suitable place for the offsite backup machine, though.

    11. Re:Offsite != cloud by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Friends you don't have are actually quite compact - you could fit several in even a very small box.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  2. Fireproof Hard Drive by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:Fireproof Hard Drive by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Fireproof Hard Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The spec states that it is only rated 1/2 hour for 1550F. This is enough for a small fire, but is not enough for a fully involved house fire. (Firefighter for 20 years :-)

      Store your backup offsite at a friend's/relative's house.

    3. Re:Fireproof Hard Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, I'm going to go with the fire fighter.

  3. USB Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    My preferred way is to copy the data to many different USB sticks. I write a little note with my name and address on it, slip the that and the stick into a bottle and pitch it into the ocean. Data is safe from fires and most other natural disasters. Best of all, people around the world contact me (we even become FB friends after!) and return the USB with all my data!

    Works like a charm

    1. Re:USB Stick by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 2

      "Real men don't back up their data. They post the source online and let the world mirror it" -Linus Torvalds.

      (that's from memory, I don't know if he ever actually said that)

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  4. megaupload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    megaupload

  5. Storing locally will cost you more, not less... by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in the short run and in the long run. Also, storing locally does nothing to protect you from flood, fire, theft, etc... Backblaze is $5/mo, unlimited storage. I'm sure there are others with similar/better deals. What's a NAS inside a fireproof safe going to cost?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Storing locally will cost you more, not less... by sirwoogie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhh, he did say 8TB worth of data. Not knowing his internet connection, this is still pretty much out of reach for most residential services except extreme FIOS connections. If you factor in caps it could take a long time. For example, lets be generous and figure he has a 350G/mo cap. Even at this rate for 8 terabyes it would take nearly 2 full years to get it to the cloud without exceeding the cap. That's just for the upload. Same amount of time for the download. Now let's also say he didn't have a cap, and also had a great connection at about 50Mbps (which most of us don't in the US). That would take over 16 days full line rate accounting for overhead just to get it up there, same amount back down. If you had an unmetered Gigabit line, that might be one thing. Sounds like he's a starving artist with low budget. Gotta work with the requirements. I think sneakernet an array to a friend that you trust that lives far enough away from you or take them to work (if you don't work at home) are the best options.

      --
      -wog
    2. Re:Storing locally will cost you more, not less... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not everybody works for the CIA. I have my photographs and other data on 2 GB external drives. I rotate them weekly or biweekly, backing up new stuff and checking the older. Total storage now about 6 TB.

      That said, if you're doing 64 GB in a couple of hours, a little more practice with shot discipline will help you both in storage and in workflow time. That's too many pictures.

      Then the DELETE key is your friend. Especially if you're doing that many shots. They can't ALL win the Pulitzer Price.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Storing locally will cost you more, not less... by Achra · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That said, if you're doing 64 GB in a couple of hours, a little more practice with shot discipline will help you both in storage and in workflow time. That's too many pictures.

      Then the DELETE key is your friend. Especially if you're doing that many shots. They can't ALL win the Pulitzer Price.

      This.

      To quote Ken Rockwell: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/howto.htm

      Only show your very strongest images.

      Throw away most of what you shoot. I do. Most of my photos are awful!

      Go through the few photos you save out of a roll, and then throw away all but the one strongest image.

      Next time, go through the few you've saved from a few rolls, and throw more away.

      This isn't painting. In photography it is a requirement to throw away most of what you do.

      You'll see that if you only save or show your strongest images that your body of work will seem to improve. Guess what: as you show only the better images, your body of work as seen by others has improved!

      Do you think I shoot a roll of film and get a roll loaded with the images you see in my galleries? Of course not. Most of what I shoot is crap. I'm just good enough to throw most of it away and only show the good stuff.

      Ansel Adams said that if you can produce one strong image in a year that you are doing very well. Don't expect to turn out miracles every roll, or even every month. Ansel didn't, I don't, and I don't think anyone does.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
  6. if it has value, pay up by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if you earn revenue from it, pay for backups
    if it has sentimental value then think about paying for backups

    hard drives go bad all the time so if you're going to back up to hard disk and its important buy a few external ones and keep them in different locations

  7. A couple options by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, going strictly by your requirements, I would suggest either a fireproof safe or fireproof drive enclosure. I don't have experience with the enclosures, but the safe itself should be able to handle your normal everyday fire and protect your data.

    However, I'd suggest that you don't store your safe at your location at all. Surely you have a friend or someone you know that would let you borrow a few square feet of their basement for the safe. This would create a physcial barrier that would enhance your securiy if not always convenient. I'd also recommend a second copy somewhere else if this data is that important to you.

    Remember that as with (almost) anything else, there is a cost-benefit tradeoff. I'm not convinced that a "cloud" based solution is your best bet anyway. But a simple, low tech solution seems to be what you need anyhow.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:A couple options by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      First, going strictly by your requirements, I would suggest either a fireproof safe or fireproof drive enclosure. I don't have experience with the enclosures, but the safe itself should be able to handle your normal everyday fire and protect your data.

      Most "fireproof" safes are only designed to keep paper from catching fire, which is higher than a lot of computer media can stand. You need to get a media rated safe, which has more insulation and is more expensive.

      However, I'd suggest that you don't store your safe at your location at all. Surely you have a friend or someone you know that would let you borrow a few square feet of their basement for the safe. This would create a physcial barrier that would enhance your securiy if not always convenient

      I'd go with a deposit box at a bank, so you don't have to bother your friend all the time. If you want to make regular backups then it better not feel like you're hassling somebody. For the money you save on the fireproof safe you can probably rent one for years.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  8. Safety Deposit Box by foradoxium · · Score: 2

    Have you thought of getting a safety deposit box at a bank? Usually they're in a fire resistant box inside a fire resistant room.

    Store backup copies of disks in there, and swap them out, similar to tape backup strategies.

  9. Safe deposit box by AMDinator · · Score: 2

    You could put some backup drives in a safe deposit box. With as much as you're storing, it may be beneficial to store just the bare drives.

  10. Delete more by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any pro photographer will tell you that 95% of what you shoot is crap. Prune it mercilessly.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Delete more by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Any pro photographer will tell you that 95% of what you shoot is crap."

      That depends ENTIRELY on the kind of photography. For example, if it's portraiture like yearbook photos, or wedding photos, or many other such things, the customer decides what's good and what they want to keep, and they typically have the option of coming back and buying more prints later.

      In cases like that, you can't prune. You have to keep it all.

    2. Re:Delete more by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

      If he only had 7 TB, then I'd suggest he is pruning already or is new to the business. Even a not-so-good photographer like me has over 100 GB of "good" (for me) pictures though I'm sure I could reduce this somewhat. A person who does this for a living can accumulate TBs a year easily. And, if he is doing client work, he is likely to want to store a lot of what he takes just in case the client wants a particular shot.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Delete more by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A 10MP image in RAW form is probably at most 20MB (a little overhead for meta data, etc) in size. At current HDD prices ($150/2TB == $75/TB == $0.073/GB) that comes to about 0.14 CENTS per photograph ($0.0014/photo). Lets say you can go through your photos and delete 20 photos per minute (3 seconds per photo on average is reasonable), that's 1200 photos per hour, or $1.72 worth of HDD space per hour (for your first copy). Even if you have 4 redundant backups (5 total copies), you are still deleting photos at $8.58/hour, which is below minimum wage for any modern country. Your time is worth more than that and I doubt you would feel comfortable having a minimum-wage intern deciding which photos are worth keeping.

      Another way to look at it is with each photo (with 4 redundant backups) costing $0.007 to store, if you delete 10,000 photos ($70 HDD savings) is that really worth the risk of a client possibly wanting a $100 print of even ONE of those photos?!?

      Moral of the story: With today's HDD prices, unless you have a lot of VERY big files or can automate deletion, deleting stuff is actually more expensive than backing it up 4 times.

    4. Re:Delete more by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      A 10MP image in RAW form is probably at most 20MB (a little overhead for meta data, etc) in size.

      The OP is a photographer. I guess you haven't seen the trend in current top of the range cameras have you? Nikon D4 TIFF files are 105MB each. RAW about 60MB. Similar cameras from other manufacturers come in about the same. That's not even taking into account that he may be shooting high def video with the thing at his events too.

      Not only does that significantly increase your numbers, but you're missing the knock on effects of the deleting. Suppose you need to go back and find a photo, would you rather sort through 1000 photos of crap, or 100 good photos?

      Taking the time to delete and sort your photos can save you a lot in the long run.

  11. The Bank by quadra · · Score: 2

    Safe deposit boxes aren't expensive and they're not a bad offsite location to store copies of you data on external hard drives. I don't really like using hard disks for long-term archiving but it's one of the lowest cost practical solutions. A tape drive would be something to look into but they're not cheap.

  12. CrashPlan Software by FunOne · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.crashplan.com/

    Unlimited backup for $5/mo to the cloud. FREE backup to other computers using their software which is cross platform on Windows, Mac, and Linux. I'd purchase an external HD(s), backup to it then get a friend to put it at their house. You can adopt the backup on their computer and then backup to their computer (FREE) and to your external HD(s) with their software automatically from your own computer.

    Or you can just sync it to the cloud, but 8TB might take a while to get everything up there.

    --
    FunOne
  13. safe deposit box by condition-label-red · · Score: 2

    In addition to your "hard drives in different rooms" strategy, consider keeping a copy offsite in a bank safe deposit box.

    --
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  14. Re:raid 0 swap by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Repeat after me:

    Raid is not a backup

    And RAID 0 is never used for reliability as it has no redundancy - the more disks, the higher chance of failure. You must have meant RAID 1.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  15. No by Legion303 · · Score: 2

    "does anyone have good ideas on how to best protect data without it leaving the site?"

    If it's not leaving the site, you aren't protecting it. At the very least, get a few portable drives and rotate backups to a relative's house.

  16. Tape is still king by ZorkZero · · Score: 2

    Any company that I've ever worked for that had money to spend did tape backups and stored them in a vault offsite. Tapes get verified as they're written, and don't have parts that fail like hard drives do. They have a 30-year shelf life, and you'll always be able to find a way to read them in the future. Go to ebay, buy a used LTO3 or LTO4 drive, (400GB and 800GB uncompressed, respectively). Tapes are about $25/ea for LTO3. Then put a backup somewhere safe.

  17. Delete, delete, delete by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see this all the time with photographers. Bottom line: your photographs are not all that valuable. Some are, yes. Most are not. Pare them down. Delete the bad ones, the failures, the misfocussed, the bad exposures. The greatest photographers the world has ever known are only known for a few dozen photos at best. Do you really need an 8 TB photographic archive? Who's going to ever look at them all? Save the best. Delete the rest.

    1. Re:Delete, delete, delete by funwithBSD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or don't delete them, but sort them into tiers and do a less reliable back up for them, and send the critical stuff offsite.

      prioritize, or you will drown in data.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  18. Crashplan by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to sound like a shill (I'm a fanboy, which, while different, will sound somewhat similar in practice), Crashplan has a free option available where you and a friend can both run it and can use it to back up to each other. If you have a photographer friend (ideally in a place far enough away that you won't be hit by the same natural disaster), this can be a pretty good option. It'll likely take awhile to do the backups, however, and you'll also need to have adequate hard drives on hand to store not only your own work, but also your friend's, which may get in the way of going cheap.

    That said, for $140 (the price of a hard drive or two) you can get a 4-year subscription for their cloud hosting with an unlimited backup size. The company I work at uses their business-level product, and I recently started using Crashplan+ at home for my own computers. While it does take awhile to back up, it's painless to do so. At least so far, I prefer it quite a bit over Carbonite, which is what I was previously using at home.

  19. Mom? by microcars · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give your mom a box of backups and ask her to hold on to it, it is "stuff you made"
    She'll never get rid of it.
    and if the house catches fire, it will be the first thing she grabs when she runs out.

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:Mom? by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Funny

      Glue some macaroni art on the drives if you think she might forget what they are...

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  20. Secondary Site by onyxruby · · Score: 2

    Set up a RAID 6 array at a friends or relatives house. Do an initial dump of all of your data to it before you bring it over to them. Offer to pay their Internet bill in exchange. Set up a VPN and run rsync between your place and theirs.

    That has got to be about the cheapest and simplest off site back up you can possible have. You can even write off the cost of their Internet as a necessary business expense if you can get a receipt (since you are a photographer for a living and not a hobby).

  21. Re:Why not get a firesafe? by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not get a firesafe? Some of them are rated for higher temperatures than house fires usually attain

    Because they are rated to prevent paper from catching on fire. And what temperature does this happen (hand in your geek card if you don't know the answer!): 451 Farenheit.

    Think your hard drive will survive 451 degrees?

    Yes, you can get a special fire safe to protect media, but it is more money.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  22. mitigating 'fire' risks by bingbong · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're going to put things in a fire rated container, there are a few things to consider. Those containers are not "fire proof" by any means. Get one whose rating is reasonably high as they will buy you some time.

    Most house fires are either a basic 'room and contents' or a much more involved fire where whole floors are exposed (and largely consumed) by flame.

    When you put your fire rated container somewhere, consider that fire burns upwards, and the thermal difference from floor to ceiling is around 400 degrees F on average. Before you put the container in the basement corner, remember that firefighters use water to put out fires. Lots of water. 150-200GPM per handline and 1000-2000GPM for the big pipes on the ladder trucks. Most of the damage in a house fire is from water. You'll get us much as 6-12 inches of flooding per floor (until the firefighters cut holes in the floor to drain it so the floors don't collapse.

    Also should the roof or ceiling collapse, the best places to have things are near the corners of the load bearing walls.

    This is my long way of saying store your fire rated container on a solid hardwood (not particle board) or metal shelf, about knee height on a low floor near the corner by load bearing walls. This way in the event the whole house is a write off, you still have a reasonable chance of saving some of your data and personal effects.

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  23. Crashplan by radish · · Score: 2

    I use a backup service called Crashplan. They have clients for Linux/Mac/Windows and support backups either to your local network (free), "friends" machines in a p2p type configuration (free) or to their servers (paid). Everything's encrypted locally and the client app is pretty decent IMHO. Best of all is that the paid plans are pretty reasonable - I have the unlimited plan for something like $100 a year, and it really is unlimited (well, they claim it is and I have no reason to doubt them). I currently have about 3TB up there so I don't see why you'd have an issue.

    The way I have it configured is that all the machines on my network backup to both my local fileserver and to their cloud. The local backup has a higher priority so any changes get pushed over the lan immediately and then batched up and sent offsite over the slower link. Speedwise I can't saturate my uplink when uploading to them but I get a pretty consistent 1-2MB/s, so figure maybe 100GB a day? I think my initial seed took a couple of weeks. I've done a couple of small test restores and download speeds were similar (although in all but complete disasters I'd be restoring from my local fileserver which is obviously far faster).

    Disclaimer - Not related to the company in any way, just a very happy customer.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  24. Seriously tape backup by Robbat2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Look for a used LTO3/LTO4 tape drive, then bulk-buy tapes.
    Write each set of content to two tapes, ideally of different brands, and store in different places if you're really concerned.

    I've been backing up to LTO3 tapes for ~3 years now, i've got 50+ tapes, mostly in my safety deposit box at the bank (cost $75/year)

    LTO4 based on eBay prices right now would be an initial expenditure of ~$1k for the drive, and $25-30 per 800GB of storage.

    The cloud options aren't really feasible for me, as the upload time & bandwidth cost is horrendous.

    --
    ICQ# : 30269588
    "I used to be an idealist, but I got mugged by reality."
  25. Re:raid 0 swap by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    My RAID goes to 11, man....

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  26. Re:Gluster by Errtu76 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gluster can't be told where to store something. So even in a gigantic cluster you still run into the problem that 2 duplicates of a file can be located on two storage nodes that are physically near to eachother. Let's say right where your fire begins ..

  27. Re:Dude by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

    And if you run a server that runs a Crashplan compatable OS like Linux or Windows, you can put that somewhere and back up via Crashplan to that server. Personally I use a BSD box with ZFS as the repository.

    You can mix and match al the options, backup local, backup to friend, backup to the Crashplan cloud.
    Crashplan does a good job of compressing and de duping data, so you might not have to upload all 8TB.

    Oh, and you can pre-seed by sending data on a portable drive to Crashplan and then just catch up.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  28. As a photographer myself... by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 2

    As a photographer myself (Though only around 4TB of photos at current) here's my setup:

    Onsite backup: Drobo to Drobo.

    Offsite backup: Backblaze. I pay $4/mo (2 years prepaid). This is a secondary backup. It still has everything, but I rely on the local backup to retrieve something should my primary storage fail, and the offsite is for when things burn to the ground or someone steals my stuff or lightning takes everything out. Really it's cheap, it's just that initial backup which takes an eternity and might get you in trouble with your ISP. Fortunately I was able to use the local university 1gbit connection to reduce my initial backup time to just 18 days (straight).

    --
    Zing!
  29. The Way of Linus by mrjb · · Score: 2

    Upload your photos. All of them. To flickr, facebook, whatever. The good ones will survive. The great ones will be shared. The ones you're ashamed of will go viral and you'll never get rid of them again, no matter how much you want them to.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  30. No safe on-site storage by hawguy · · Score: 2

    There is no "safe" on-site storage option. My brother had an expensive expensive fire-proof gun safe at his house - it weighed over 500 lbs.... After his house literally burnt to the ground (rural area, no one home to alert the first department, by the time the neighbor down the road saw the fire and called the fire department, all they could do was put out the fire in the surrounding brush (and cars)), he couldn't even identify any remaining pieces of the safe or the guns that were in it in the debris.

    If you want your data safe, store it off site, preferably in another part of the country so it's not subject to the same local disasters as your house. Mailing snapshots of your data to an out of state relative is probably best.

  31. Be very, very careful with fireboxes by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2

    Fireboxes are designed to keep paper from bursting into flame. Sure, your hard drive is mostly metal, but that PCB board on the back could melt, warp, lose solder, etc.

    I guess the part I don't understand is how any of the solutions involving buying another hard drive (or three) and securing them are somehow cheaper than a tool like www.crashplan.com that is $50 a year for unlimited storage. Sure, the upload of 8TB will take a while.. so what? a single T1 (1.5Mbs) line can upload a few TB a month.

    Then its all offsite. Worst case, just download the crashplan sofware, and have a buddy install it too, and use the free person to person backup feature (only pay to store on their servers) to have an offsite backup. Have him bring his PC over for a night, to sync up the initial copy.. then you will just send changes over the internet.

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  32. Re:Gluster by DragonTHC · · Score: 3, Informative

    there are better options than that.

    for starters, 100GB archival gold Bluray XL discs

    digistor makes them and guarantees them for life.

    If you buy a 25pk spindle, they include a free drive.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  33. Re:Why not get a firesafe? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

    HDD's are more than just cases with platters. At those temperatures expect circuit boards to fry, magnets to lose their strength, seals to melt, connectors to "fall off", voice coils to become wires, spindles to warp, plastic to drip, etc. Transplanting platters is NOT something you do yourself and costs THOUSANDS to get done professionally (and hope it works).

  34. Crashplan with initial seed (to your own offsite) by Fencepost · · Score: 2

    Crashplan is likely to be a reasonable option, including the free version, particularly if you're working from an office that is separate from your home, or if you have a friend, relative, or given the size of your daily data increase perhaps just a neighbor who's willing to accept a machine for you. Notes on that at the end.

    What you'll want to do is set up a backup machine with plenty of disk space. This will likely need to be a single monster volume and you probably want to ensure that it's expandable; I can't help with the details of that but others here certainly can. What are the good expandable RAID options?

    The backup machine will receive the initial backup sitting next to the source machine, but will then be moved offsite. Given the volume of data you described, creating a "seed" backup and just moving that would likely be more hassle than it's worth.

    All machines involved should have Gigabit Ethernet, and I strongly recommend investing in a Gigabit network switch or better, an ABGN router with Gigabit ports. If you can find one, I like the WNDR3700v2 (that v2 is REALLY IMPORTANT and hard to find these days) running OpenWRT, but there are plenty of other options. You're still going to need an Internet connection for the machines to identify each other (I believe this uses Crashplan's servers even if you're not backing up to them).

    Once you have all that set up, you're just going to install Crashplan on both machines, run your backup, and move the backup machine to its new home. Crashplan assigns unique IDs to machines and uses those for coordinating the backups between them, so the fact that the backup server has moved won't cause a problem.

    Finally for the note about "just a neighbor" - if you're creating tens or hundreds of gigs of new data per month, just hosting your offsite backup may be a problem for many people (think bandwidth caps), and transmitting it may be just as big a problem for you. If you have or can find a reasonably close neighbor that you'll trust with an encrypted copy of your data and who's willing to host your machine, I'm going to strongly suggest that you set up the machine with a good wireless connector and have it in their house but on your wireless. Ideally this person would not be in the same building you're in (assuming condo/apartment). Wireless-N at 2.4GHz is likely to be your best bet for range, though it's more prone to interference than 5.5GHz.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  35. Re:Gluster by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    Or just use BD-R (*non*-LTH) discs. Millenniata discs are basically BD-R media burned to look like a DVD to the player. They're great when DVD-compatibility is important, but kind of a waste if you can make use of 25-gig BD-R capacity (BD-R is cheaper per-disc than Millenniata).

    Just insist on *original*-type inorganic BD-R, and stay awy from "LTH" BD-R. The same way that Millenniata is like BD R media in DVD form, LTH is DVD media in Blu-Ray form.