Thoughts On the iPad Mini

John Gruber at Daring Fireball has a thoughtful piece about the design of Apple's smaller iPad, which the company is expected to announce on September 12. Simply shrinking the current iPad's dimensions to a new form factor is unlikely, he says, and the bezel surrounding the display is more likely to be a cross between an iPad and an iPhone. He also discusses evidence of Apple's PR team getting the rumor mill going immediately after the announcement of Google's Nexus 7, and how Apple has probably bet on having a thinner and lighter tablet than Google, rather than worrying about a better display. Quoting: "Apple product designs are true to themselves. Each thing has proportions suited to its own nature. Consider how the iPad doesn’t look like a blown up iPhone. They share a few similar design elements — a family resemblance, if you will — but the proportions are different. The iPad has a thick bezel surrounding all four sides of the display; the iPhone does not. Why? Because you need a place to rest your thumbs while holding an iPad. ... Should not the iPad Mini fall somewhere in between? Not as close to the aspect ratio of its display as the iPad-as-we-know-it, but also not as far away from its display aspect ratio as the iPhone. You might need more thumb-rest room on the sides than you do on the iPhone, but not nearly as much as you do on the full-size iPad. If that assumption is right, the proportions of a 7.85-inch 4:3-aspect-ratio display iPad Mini are likely not the same as the proportions of the 9.7-inch 4:3-aspect-ratio display iPad."

Comments

Who would have guessed?

[Impy the Impiuos Imp]

Hmmmmm. It's true -- some people do prefer 7" over 9".

Re:Who would have guessed?

[Anonymous Coward]

Really? I'm sporting a 6" and on some days I grow close to 7"... depends really.

Re:Who would have guessed?

[Anonymous Coward]

I have one which automatically extends when I need a larger size. Other times it fits comfortably in my pants. However, I don't think size really matters if you just remember to use a protective cover.

Re:Who would have guessed?

[nitehawk214]

Hmmmmm. It's true -- some people do prefer 7" over 9".

That is, in fact, NOT what she said.

Re:Who would have guessed?

[blind biker]

It's true -- some people do prefer 7" over 9".

I guess I could work in a "Or vagina" joke here, somehow, but I'm lazy.

Re:Look, it's a smaller iPad

[serviscope_minor]

It's a smaller iPad.

My god that's innovative! They should totally patent that idea!

Re:You must have very large pockets.

[Anonymous Coward]

Skinny jeans might be all the rage among hipsters these days but us normal people can easily fit a cellphone in a pants pocket. Where the hell are you carrying yours? In your "it's not a purse, it's European!"?

Re:You must have very large pockets.

[jguevin]

I would have figured at least 1/3 of the crowd here would be sporting a utility kilt. You can carry a netbook in those.

Re:Why not just wait?

[chill]

Compiling!

Re:in other words, a bigger ipod

[Anonymous Coward]

Couldn't agree more. Wonder when Apple will launch a /. competitor. Kinda like how the Googlers wet themselves over Macbooks continuously, then Apple started eating into their markets and consumer audiences.

But to put out some constructive criticism, this site would be way more useful for our freedoms if instead of wasting time on i-device trivialities, they compared, say, Charmin vs Angel Soft vs store brand and store-brand premium. I say the most important metric is total sq m (sq ft for you non-metrics) and # plies (that plural of ply, for you libertarians/tea-f**ks).